It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XPhiles
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
lame argument at best. did you actually read the whole post by Dr. brown ?
Brown concludes the BH time travel idea is impossible on a few levels. 1) the size the devise would have to be. 2) the cooling issue. 3) what happens when a BH is near earths gravitational pull. Can you challenge him on any of these points ? I'd love to see you try. He never says time travel is impossible, just titors story.
lame argument .HA ..I was stating a FACT that Dr.Brown message on Titor is only opinion based by his own knowledge.
Why would I want to challenge Dr.Brown's own BH hypothesis, it is not scientific theory or fact.
You just need to let go man... Physicist are not the smartest people in the world. So what, Dr Brown knows how an electron behaves, that does not prove a thing does it. I mean come on, my 10 year old cousin knows what a electron is, millions of people know what a electron is. It is silly for you to question other people "do you know what a electron is" that is just plan silly.... It almost sounds like you just discovered what a electron is lol. For Real......
Bring out all his points one by one if you want, it will be doomed for failure.
Face the facts...... Dr.Brown can not prove Titor is a hoax.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
lauchpad, you just wrote a bunch of words....but said absolutely nothing.
1. You failed to show clear definition of what a Waco "like" event is
2. You failed to show the 23 incidents that were in any way like Waco
3. You failed to show how the media is covering these events
4. Yes Titor said things would escalate. The things that were to escalate were supposed to start happening last year. He - not me - said the start of the Civil War would be Waco type events that would happen each month getting worse and worse. Surely 23 months in we would have noticed by now. Around 130 million people die according to Titor. And since the nuke war targets the cities, which according to Titor would be occupied by the Federal forces, that means the vast majority of those 130 million people die in the Civil War. That's the equivilant to 13,000,000 people a year.
Let's say half the people die in the Nuke war, that would mean 65 million people died in the Civil War. That's 6.5 million people. Taking into account that the war would start off slowly and steadily grow worse....you're still talking about thousands of deaths per year. Surely at that pace we would have noticed the deaths by now.
5. What's your fascination with the word "like"
Just went over my post....didn't say "like" once. (I did say "likely" once)
6. Oh yeah, you also failed at your petty attempts at insults.
Originally posted by launchpad
1. I failed to define Waco Like???? No Titor Failed to define it and you keep trying to make the EXACT Waco situation the "WACO LIKE" event Titor talked about. Previvous post still applies.
2. 23 incidents???? Who said anything about 23 incidents? Again- your hard line approach to generallities put forth bu Titor. Previous post STILL applies.
3. I wasn't discussing anything about the media- nor trying to prove anything. How much media coverage of the events in 33 was there. The US citizens largely had zero clue as to the european situation.
4. How many deaths were largely reported 33-39??? Thats six years NOT 11 months! Hind site it was the start of a WW not a little Civil war. How many died post 39 in the 6 remaining years of the war? there you go ecalation. Titor said 05-15 thats ten years for it to escalate and additionally he said something about 2008 being the year it was RECOGNISED. If you cannot grasp the concept of most not recognising it until then- it is kind of pointless to continue any discussion with you what so ever.
The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over. The civil war in the United States will start in 2004.
By 2008, I would say the civil conflict is pretty much at everyone's doorstep.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
TJW your ignornance on the way the human brain works never ceases to amaze me. you act as though it is impossible for people to slowly realize whats going on.
you think that scienctist just one day wake up and learned quantum physics and all the maths behind it? no they slowly learned by things they took in over the years, then finally came to the conclusions based on everything they have seen. or they finally understand one day the whole idea of this area of physics because they figure out the final part to what they were ignorant to so far.
people dont just suddenly know. its not like one day everyone is walking the streets, wake up next morning and the entire country is in chaos. it doesnt work that way. not usually at least, unless there is some undeniable event (nuke were to go off in jacksonville florida, currently the largest city in the U.S. if i recall. washington d.c., or some other very important city)even then its not all out chaos, the society just dissolves very quickly.
im not tryin to insult you but you mindset is it must be a waco event. waco type events can be seen in a much broader definition. the thing is you can get too specific but keep in mind to general as well.
neither of us are fully wrong, i simply feel that you want to prove titor wrong based on your definition of a waco type event. this to me holds no use in fighting over.
specifically let me know where he is incorrect, supporting evidence would be appreciated
> His suitcase contains TWO of these? He carried this suitcase on a 67
> Chevy? Man, they must put a hell of a suspension in those babies...
An electron or quark is NOT made up (so far as we can tell) of smaller
> particles glued together. As far as we can tell,.
> So why say his BH's are the "size of an electron"
How many PhD's are supporting titor specifically, and have stated they read his posts and think he's legit ? My one is better than your zero.
John Titor
Piece 1:
“I would describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse.”
John Titor
Piece 2:
“Have you see the documentary on Waco? Just for argument's sake, what do you think would happen if information were discovered that confirmed the worst accusations made against the law enforcement officers there? Would you hope nothing?”
John Titor
Piece 3:
“However, there are a great many "non lethal" weapon systems in development that turn out to be quite lethal. Sometimes I watch your television programs that show SWAT teams using new non-lethal weapons. They usually start out with, "In the future, the army and police will fight its enemies with new weapons systems…" When they use the word "enemy", they're talking about YOU!”
John Titor
Piece 4:
“For a few months now, I have bee trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005.”
John Titor
Piece 5:
“There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years.”
John Titor
Piece 6:
“The civil war in the United States will start in 2004.”
John Titor
Piece 7:
“It’s 2004. I apologize for a missed key (very observant – we all need good critics).”
John Titor
Piece 8:
”I don't remember a great deal about media coverage during the civil conflicts. I would probably characterize it the same way you see coverage of Waco, Ruby Ridge and Elian Gonzalez.”
John Titor
Piece 9:
“Me: “However, there are a great many ‘non lethal’ weapon systems in development that turn out to be quite lethal.” Anyone for microwave popcorn?”
www.zmag.org...
Keep in mind that DARPA (whom we can thank for the Active Denial System -- the new microwave crowd-control weapon the Pentagon hopes to deploy to a police station near you by summer 2008) is just the daddy of DoD contractors: there are some 310,000 companies around the world working for America's war industry. That's what we're up against.
John Titor
Piece 10:
“It's 2004. I apologize for a missed key (very observant - we all need good critics). Perhaps our definition of war is different. I would define it as a conflict where organized groups engage in maneuver and armed conflict.”
John Titor
Piece 11:
"You must realize that why people are fighting is more important that what they are fighting with. The conflict was not about taking and holding ground it was about order and rights. They were betting that people wanted security instead of freedom and they were wrong.”
John Titor
Piece 12:
Q: Will you readily be able to identify the enemy?
JT: “They will be the ones arresting and holding people without due process.”
John Titor
Piece 13:
Q: Is the conflict racial?
JT: “ Not at all. In fact, I would say it goes a long way toward erasing racial problems.”
John Titor
Piece 14:
”There's not a great deal I know about Canada except to say they were pretty much in the same type of conflict.”
John Titor
Piece 15:
Q: Does the civil war start in such a way that those willing will have time to remove themselves to safer locations.
JT: “Yes. You will be forced to ask yourself how many civil rights you will give up to feel safe.”
John Titor
Piece 16:
“By 2008, I would say the civil conflict is pretty much at everyone's doorstep.”
John Titor
Piece 17:
“Outright open fighting was common by then and I joined a shotgun infantry unit in 2011.
John Titor
Piece 18:
”The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.”
John Titor
Piece 19:
“When the civil "conflict" started and got worse, people generally decided to either stay in the cities and lose most of their civil rights under the guise of security or leave the cities for more isolated and rural areas.”
John Titor
Piece 20:
Q: You said that there will be a big war. Can you at least tell us which cities will be nuked?
JT: “No I won't do that. However, I submit to you that when the moment comes it will be absolutely plain as day that you are unsafe in the cities. The millions people that stay will choose to stay. That's what comes as a surprise.”
John Titor
Piece 21:
”Perhaps I should let you all in on a little secret. No one likes you in the future. This time period is looked at as being full of lazy, self-centered, civically ignorant sheep. Perhaps you should be less concerned about me and more concerned about that.”
John Titor
Piece 22:
“While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you.”
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Roth, who are you trying to convince?
I could go over your post piece by piece, but that would just make it seem like your post is credible.
Bottom line, the person who created the John Titor persona took a look at the politics of this country and had a message to send, warning us of what he thinks could happen if we don't change. Instead of just writing or bloggin his message in a regular way, he choose a different way. A way that would get attention.
Nothing he wrote was anything new. Every single one of his predictions have been predicted by others around the internet and elsewhere, well before he created John Titor (well before the internet in fact).
There is absolutely nothing in the John Titor story that tells me that it's anything other than a fictional story. In fact, thinking back...I did the exact same thing back in high school. Our assignment was to pretend it was the year 2020. We had to describe current events then, and leading up to 2020.
I wish I could remember all that I wrote but I know I got some stuff right (like us going back to Iraq and taking out Saddam).
What's the difference between that and John Titor?
Originally posted by Roth Joint
On the contrary of what you wrote, John Titor's words were unthinkable of in a pre 9-11 world.
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Why is this still a topic? Titor is a joke and has been proven false. Can we move along now people and talk about something more interesting. It's nearly 2006 and nothing has happened proving that Titor was a hoax so if this topic is still active in january then you all are mentally insane.
"what if I told you I did go forward to “your” 2036 and it looks nothing like mine. It is quite possible"
Yes, this is true. If I go forward on this world line, the future will not be my future. I get
home by going back to 1975 before I arrived and then going forward to 2036.
(…If I go forward on this world line, the future will not be my future. I get home by going
back to 1975 before I arrived and then going forward to 2036.") A few people have asked
me about this statement so I will try to clarify it. On my worldline (A) in 2036, I was given a
mission in 1975. I turn my machine on and jump to another worldline (B) in 1975 with
about a 2% divergence from (A). From the very point I turn my machine off on (B), I create
a new worldline just because I’m there. This line can be described as (C) and started when I got to (B). I am now doing my mission on line (C) in 1975 when I discover a very a good
reason to go forward on (C) and see what happened. I turn my machine on and go forward on (C) to the year 2000. When I turn it off, I start another line called (D). So from my perspective, here we are on line (D) in the year 2000. In order to go home to line (A) I
must turn my machine on and go back on (D) until I reach (C) which in turn would take me
back to (B) which in turn takes me to a point before I arrived on (B) then I go forward from
the point I arrived on (B) back to (A).
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Originally posted by Roth Joint
On the contrary of what you wrote, John Titor's words were unthinkable of in a pre 9-11 world.
That is completely false. Maybe you didn't have access to the internet pre 9/11 or just weren't paying attention. But some of Titor's predictions have been around for decades. Alot of militia and anti government people have been preaching this stuff for years and years.
Some of that stuff was predicted right before Titor came on the scene.......Y2k fears.
Just because you weren't paying attention doesn't mean it didn't happen.