Baltic Sea Anomaly update:

originally posted by: 57ORM1IV
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Ok... it’s a lot like moon raker they are mining for monotomic gold mostly.. there’s colony’s of the other species too


... other minerals too.. I’m surprised they are hunting monotomic gold they do that here it’s used as energy source but the moon won’t have much there.. I suppose they know what they are doing though.. NASA knows about this too, well those with clearance.. inside joke is
“thank # they aren't here for oil” lol


Urgh I’ve been made to feel nausea again
I’m a TI targeted Individual...
but that won’t stop me haha

Titan is mined and Saturn’s rings aren’t disappearing by magic, yes it’s sad that they have done basically the same as us to their planets but at least they are resourceful

I know how it works.

When you recover, try and find things looking like sleep chambers, or Sarcophagus. How are they arranged, and how many. Are there any "electronics" connected to them.... Thank you for your effort.

P.S. If this area is too far from thread topic you can message me directly.
Again, thank you

Ok I will but they know they are being watched by me don’t like it much in a reply to: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: 57ORM1IV
I also remote viewed the spot for myself crew was mostly human one ET being at the controls it happened way before this term in the forth term where we was more likely to fly in airships than aeroplanes, they didn’t exsist then... likely why there’s not much evidence of it.

The ET being, He couldn’t speak human but could with mannerisms and body language he wasn’t taught the universal sign language because in that term it wasn’t widely in existence here then...He was born here too I’m told they didn’t die on impact.
We are in 6th term now.

As a thought experiment and remembering this one point, it may not work because this would require you to be able to find this without the usual unopened letter but I am willing this image to you from my mind without knowing were you are or if you will even get this.

I am willing TWO images from personal experience to you, I will not explain them or describe them at all but I want you to try to describe at least one of them and keep an open mind - but a closed soul?.

IF either of us has any psychic potential (I believe most people have) and you come even close in your description I will tell you if you are seeing the image at all - if not then at least I shall explain it.

Done.

As a part of this experiment just make a quick reply and I will then explain both images I have willed to you - do not try to rationalize them.

a reply to: LABTECH767 they are pictures.. at least one was another a memory

originally posted by: 57ORM1IV
a reply to: LABTECH767 they are pictures.. at least one was another a memory

Pen, and paper

a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Yes Ithink at first LABTECH767 though to send shapes but that would be too easy.. see ha he secretly knew how good I was so can remote view some himself it was going to be a square lol

originally posted by: 57ORM1IV
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Yes

Ithink at first LABTECH767 though to send shapes but that would be too easy.. see ha he secretly knew how good I was so can remote view some himself it was going to be a square lol

Paper and Pen are symbolic, though some paper is square, some are rectangular. They both do the same thing.

originally posted by: LABTECH767

originally posted by: 57ORM1IV
I also remote viewed the spot for myself crew was mostly human one ET being at the controls it happened way before this term in the forth term where we was more likely to fly in airships than aeroplanes, they didn’t exsist then... likely why there’s not much evidence of it.

The ET being, He couldn’t speak human but could with mannerisms and body language he wasn’t taught the universal sign language because in that term it wasn’t widely in existence here then...He was born here too I’m told they didn’t die on impact.
We are in 6th term now.

As a thought experiment and remembering this one point, it may not work because this would require you to be able to find this without the usual unopened letter but I am willing this image to you from my mind without knowing were you are or if you will even get this.

I am willing TWO images from personal experience to you, I will not explain them or describe them at all but I want you to try to describe at least one of them and keep an open mind - but a closed soul?.

IF either of us has any psychic potential (I believe most people have) and you come even close in your description I will tell you if you are seeing the image at all - if not then at least I shall explain it.

Done.

As a part of this experiment just make a quick reply and I will then explain both images I have willed to you - do not try to rationalize them.

Am I right? Also do you have yellow toned wallpaper?

a reply to: LABTECH767 Did you see the moth man?

a reply to: LABTECH767
I did seethe seaside and colour red but now you will likely think I’m just saying that lol

So you was a being from another planet that drowned? a reply to: LABTECH767

a reply to: LABTECH767

That’s amazing, I too have had strange experiences one in which on falling asleep I had to pick a tunnel or rabbit/wormhole to go down picking the wrong one could cause danger.. then I woke up but felt something watching from within it wasn’t a kind being so I don’t travel much in my dreams anymore.

a reply to: LABTECH767

I understood the context of your challenge. Did you understand the context of my second reply?

We carry a great deal of afterlife information within us. Genetic memory's I believe, is its title. We all have a driving force of one type or another. Righting the wrongs of past lives, or finding the answers that elude us. Some of us can enter that data bank of information, while others are oblivious to it. Still others, become enhanced, to assist in that discovery.

It is said that we live in a matrix of sorts, that I have found to be true. But it is a double matrix, one of body and flesh, and the other of spirit and soul. And the two are in compatition. Sometimes we see things that are correct, but in the wrong timeline. And sometimes we see things that are incorrect, because the timeline, is incorrect.


Your "Going Back" timeline may go back millions of years and how would we ever know for certain. For our present DNA chain only goes back 40,000 years, or so. But the other chain, goes back much further. And if their chain is within ours, then we, can see it. And by the way, the inside of the moon stinks to high heaven! Literally!


You carry the pain of one child's death. Billions upon billions. You can never forget the stench...

a reply to: All Seeing Eye what do you see inside the moon?...

I can’t investigate further as my scanning interrupts the mining and it’s a specialist job on strict time scale, I got told off.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye also yes our DNA in current form 40,000 years but imo we developed from bacteria through billions upon billions of years eating and mating everything in sight
we got where we were as primates after I think we may of been altered by higher intelligence or may of just mutated into our current selves

I don’t believe in “junk” DNA

a reply to: 57ORM1IV

Sorry I have deleted the posts as we were getting too far off subject, the Baltic sea anomaly but to answer I actually do not believe in Reincarnation BUT I do believe that we have a soul and that sometimes as may have happened to me we can enter other body's - in that case very much against my own will and while of course I was still alive here - also that body was very much already occupied?.


AllSeeingEye, I Believe Genetic memory only extends as far as instinctual behaviour THOUGH there is some evidence that a child learns the language it's parent's speak more quickly than it does one that they do not speak - very little research has been done though so that evidence I read about many years ago now may not be valid.

Endron's the so called Junk sequences which we now know are not junk at all but do serve a purpose would be the only place for such memory to be and even as complex as our DNA is - more data than all the world's library's put together - I do not believe it serves that purpose.

However I do believe we are far more complex than simply a chemical soup that one day decided to put on a cellular membrane and go out for a stroll as ordinary evolutionists do, rather I believe our origin is higher dimensional.

That said the soul?, there is some anecdotal data that may suggest a quantum soul is a reality, a quantum soul would be were you exist in parallel reality's and were one of you dies that one is then NOT gone but still exists since it was always at some level connected to the other versions of itself and so just because it's state has changed does not mean that it has gone, in fact it may even remain conscious, still have a mind and in time learn to adapt to it's new environment at a level we may regard as a higher self or a higher existence.

But do parallel universe always only split off or do them sometimes merge - this is important as it may show that a quantum soul if it exists is not the same as a spiritual soul though quantum soul's may explain many ghost like apparitions since they may over time grow so strong or the event of there creation may have such a strong localized quantum affect that they then become trapped or recorded on the very ether of the universe were they exist (ether is an outdated term that was once scientific proper but is now very much not in favour so I was just grabbing at terminology there).

My view is this, some OOBE are real, Some experiences are real but some are not no matter how real they may seem at the time to the person receiving them and there is more in heaven and earth as the old saying goes.

But from a religious point of view I am Christian in my faith so as you can guess talking about some of this is a bit uncomfortable so I am calling this a day here and yes I started this off topic vein in the thread so I apologise to you both there and especially for going off topic.

But as to the thought experiment you both got something very much correct, however it was also too vague to prove anything and too subjective to convince even me despite what I have experienced in my own life.