FBI's Steele story falls apart:

It is moving forward and gaining speed.
thehill.com...

FBI's Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA

It appears this is evidence of fraud upon a fisa court to spy on political rivals.

Newly unearthed memos show a high-ranking government official who met with Steele in October 2016 determined some of the Donald Trump dirt that Steele was simultaneously digging up for the FBI and for Hillary Clinton’s campaign was inaccurate, and likely leaked to the media.

The concerns were flagged in a typed memo and in handwritten notes taken by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec on Oct. 11, 2016. Her observations were recorded exactly 10 days before the FBI used Steele and his infamous dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and the campaign’s contacts with Russia in search of a now debunked collusion theory.

un oh
no dossier no warrant, as it was denied twice before adding the bovine feces

It is important to note that the FBI swore on Oct. 21, 2016, to the FISA judges that Steele’s “reporting has been corroborated and used in criminal proceedings” and the FBI has determined him to be “reliable” and was “unaware of any derogatory information pertaining” to their informant, who simultaneously worked for Fusion GPS, the firm paid by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Clinton campaign to find Russian dirt on Trump.

so they just straight up lied to the fisa court
unprecedented
worst abuse of power in usa history

a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm sure no Democrat will acknowledge this, instead they'll either claim it's false or ignore the topic.

Nice find tho, seems like those people running the FBI back then had no problem in using false information to get the FISA warrants.

But hey! Whatever it takes, right?

a reply to: vinifalou

They can ignore it all they like.
The IG likely will not ignore it.
The AG has already spoken in congressional testimony about an investigation into fisa fraud.

From the op:

Kavalec’s handwritten notes clearly flagged in multiple places that Steele might be talking to the media. “June — reporting started,” she wrote. “NYT and WP have,” she added, in an apparent reference to the New York Times and the Washington Post. Later she quoted Steele as suggesting he was “managing” four priorities — “Client needs, FBI, WashPo/NYT, source protection,” her handwritten notes show. Those same notes suggest Steele spun some wild theories to State, including one that the Russians had a “plant in DNC” and had assembled an “HRC dossier,” apparent references to the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Rodham Clinton. She expounded in her typed memo. “The Russians have succeeded in placing an agent inside the DNC,” she quoted Steele as saying.

Steele told them the russians had a plant in the dnc and a hillary dossier.
Where was the investigation into her campaign?????

a reply to: shooterbrody

How is this relevant when the Steele dossier was not the only thing submitted when applying for the fisa warrant???

Trump’s claim was that the Steele dossier was the primary/only evidence used to obtain the fisa warrant..


Well that wasn’t the case...

So how is one fbi official doubting the validity of the Steele dossier relevant?

a reply to: shooterbrody

How is this relevant when the Steele dossier was not the only thing submitted when applying for the fisa warrant???

Trump’s claim was that the Steele dossier was the primary/only evidence used to obtain the fisa warrant..


Well that wasn’t the case...

So how is one fbi official doubting the validity of the Steele dossier relevant?

I fail to see the relevance in this. Its not DJT's tax returns, or that weasel Barr being in satans hip pocket.

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: shooterbrody

How is this relevant when the Steele dossier was not the only thing submitted when applying for the fisa warrant???

Trump’s claim was that the Steele dossier was the primary/only evidence used to obtain the fisa warrant..


Well that wasn’t the case...

So how is one fbi official doubting the validity of the Steele dossier relevant?

Lying to the FISA court is illegal. Every bit as illegal as Flynn's supposed lie to Strzok.

And that wasn't Trumps claim.

a reply to: JustJohnny

It is not relevant that the FBI lied in court??????

Are you freaking serious????????

Yeah, it is one of the worst abuses of power in American history. I hope this abuse goes into the History books so they can learn never to let it happen again. If it gets buried then nobody will ever learn.

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm sure no Democrat will acknowledge this, instead they'll either claim it's false or ignore the topic.

Nice find tho, seems like those people running the FBI back then had no problem in using false information to get the FISA warrants.

But hey! Whatever it takes, right?

Why is it instantly true if it supports your wingerism?

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: shooterbrody

How is this relevant when the Steele dossier was not the only thing submitted when applying for the fisa warrant???

Trump’s claim was that the Steele dossier was the primary/only evidence used to obtain the fisa warrant..


Well that wasn’t the case...

So how is one fbi official doubting the validity of the Steele dossier relevant?

The fisa warrant was twice denied prior to approval the difference in the 3rd application was the steele dossier.
The obama administration oversaw and approved illegal spying on american citizens who were their political rivals with the full force of the intelligence community.
That is the relevance.

A Domestic Intelligence Agency lied to gain knowledge and find leverage on a private citizen who is running for public office. It sounds like a by line of a HBO series.

It is ridiculous.

a reply to: shooterbrody
From your link....

“reporting has been corroborated and used in criminal proceedings”

Just what criminal proceeding were they used in?
That's a pretty huge freaking lie right there.

a reply to: dfnj2015

Oh I was expecting you, one of the last lefties that have no shame at all in defending the corruption of Democrats.

And the FISA abuse is known for almost or more than a year now. It wasn't "instantly true". This is known for a while and supported by EVIDENCES. Not talking about rumors here.

You can try again in a different thread, you'll just need to try harder.

a reply to: vinifalou

Why would random democrats need to pretend the actions of one unknown individual, with no influence or following are fake ???


In what way are democrats in general responsible for her actions??

a reply to: butcherguy

I don't know.
Their "investigations" were going on, but I don't know of any criminal proceedings at that point.
Cart in front of the horse seems to be their way.

a reply to: JustJohnny

Ah johnny come lately 4/5/19, at that point there were no "random" democrats; At that point they all thought "she" would win and none of this would see the light of day.
Attempting to muddy the waters at this point is laughable johnny.
Especially when the official records are now being released.

a reply to: JustJohnny

So you condemn these actions who were made in order to illegally remove Trump from presidency?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: butcherguy

I don't know.
Their "investigations" were going on, but I don't know of any criminal proceedings at that point.
Cart in front of the horse seems to be their way.

If there had been 'criminal proceedings' involving the Trump campaign before the election.... I am pretty darn sure the MSM would have gotten the leak and proclaimed it loud and wide.

The DOJ was lying to the FISA court in that regard too.

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: shooterbrody

How is this relevant when the Steele dossier was not the only thing submitted when applying for the fisa warrant???

Trump’s claim was that the Steele dossier was the primary/only evidence used to obtain the fisa warrant..


Well that wasn’t the case...

So how is one fbi official doubting the validity of the Steele dossier relevant?

please list what evidence was used to gain the third attempt at a FISA warrant for Carter Page. Remember, the first two were denied. Thanks in advance for listing the evidence you claim exists.