It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
Checks and balances. Throughout the history of the u.s. Americans have had a love hate relationship with immigrants whether they be legal or illegal. Efforts and laws were passed in order to appease the needs of our country and also the bigotry towards new arrivals. At this point we are again at the point that we need to check the waves of immigration in order to balance our country and keep our values, morals and culture "American".
Wars are wars.
So we already have a system in place for vehicular manslaughter, what's the point of the op?
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
My family are from Mexican border towns, both sides of the border, with one side being here since the 1800s. The border towns that I am familiar with have always had a shared "culture" with people from both sides speaking Spanglish and dressed in American cowboy fashion in fact one could argue Mexicans helped establish cowboy culture. The Mexican border towns have historically been this way as they once were Mexico and we're populated by Mexican people. Now if you were to argue that Idaho was being over run by Mexican flag waving people refusing to assimilate then we could have a discussion.....but before that happens I think we have every reason to slow down immigration.
I personally am against illegal immigration although I have sympathy for the good people, I understand the need to stop illegal entry and protect ourselves from the drugs and violence associated with it pouring over southern border. I also see a problem with growing number of immigrants using welfare benefits through legal relatives. I'm sure Americans wouldn't have a problem if these people could legally support themselves and pass a medical exam and background check at the very least. Immigration reform like that would benefit all Americans imo.
a reply to: alldaylong
Many Native American tribes fought in the Revolutionary War. The majority of these tribes fought for the British but a few fought for the Americans. Many of these tribes tried to remain neutral in the early phase of the war but when some of them came under attack by American militia, they decided to join the British. Other tribes joined the British in the hopes that if the British won, they would put a stop to colonial expansion in the west, as they had done with the Royal Proclamation of 1763. The following is a list of the various tribes who fought in the Revolutionary War:
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Xtrozero
You're preaching to the choir and I do not disagree with your valid points. All of which make immigration reform and border security important talking points. I think it is important to continue this rational discussion and work towards a humane solution.
At the beginning of the 1830s, nearly 125,000 Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida–land their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. By the end of the decade, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States
The Indian-removal process continued. In 1836, the federal government drove the Creeks from their land for the last time: 3,500 of the 15,000 Creeks who set out for Oklahoma did not survive the trip.
Scott and his troops forced the Cherokee into stockades at bayonet point while whites looted their homes and belongings. Then, they marched the Indians more than 1,200 miles to Indian territory. Whooping cough, typhus, dysentery, cholera and starvation were epidemic along the way, and historians estimate that more than 5,000 Cherokee died as a result of the journey.
Are you saying this would somehow have been better if the teacher had killed the illegal immigrant.