MSM you are too Predictable!! I was spot on - MIGRANTS

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Not much merit to your thoughts there...If they seek asylum they are not illegal. Everyone can try to spin this but truth is truth that anyone can cross the border anywhere they choose if they are fleeing their government that is failing to protect their basic human rights. They are then sent to a legal place in the usa to seek asylum.

It is pathetic for america to continue to snort the despair of countries to the south while demeaning those trying to escape the fodder of Americas failed war on drugs while ignorantly putting the blame on defenseless people and ignoring the true problems with the usa gov and the laws that allow such to continue.

Legalize natural drugs and bring back temporary migrant worker visas at a rate that allows the job market to prosper. Start using voting method where the state mails your ballot and then you mail it back and have website to verify vote just as done successfully in Washington state. Disband the department of education and put the duties of ice back to the states and locals. Lower taxes. That would be a start.

originally posted by: JAGStorm

What's with all of this nonsense about midget caravans?
Why can't midgets just go and live wherever they like?
Folks wanting to keep midgets away from caravans, are just being mean!

a reply to: TheOne7

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: TheOne7

This idea of placing poor migrants into "refugee" status is the work of globalist propagandists. Period. About 10 years ago. Look it up. Or go on sounding like a halfwit. Its up to you.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: JAGStorm

So your upset that the media isn't spinning this the way you want them to?


Is that a real mother with her children being gassed or not?

I'm not saying that ALL the refugees are innocent but, should the media never show the ones that are?

a reply to: Arnie123

Do you have proof that this women and her kids are fake?

a reply to: threeeyesopen

3 cameras evident in the original photo. This is the 4th and is probably staged/scripted as well.


a reply to: scraedtosleep
The gas is far in the background and nowhere near this woman... Pfft.

a reply to: acackohfcc

On one hand you say you don't trust the msm.

On the other you use their pics as evidence.

Why not go down to the border and see for yourself who they are instead of using the media to form your opinions?

a reply to: JAGStorm

Did they do that for the extra drama?

You have proof this was staged?

Not too many little kids in this pic

Impossible to tell how many women or children are in that pic.
Besides why are you relying on pics from the media to form your opinion?


Also men are just as deserving of a better life as anyone else.
Why do you assume that they are criminals just because they are guys. Very femanazi of you.

Somebody move a smoke grenade over here in the background.
Alright, let's get this right this time. Ready? Take 3, snap, ACTION!

I doubt she has walked 2000 miles with those two kids. In fact, she most definitely has not.

This pic is probably a Mexican mother running from some of the criminal migrants who are trying to snatch her children.

Got proof it isn’t?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The original wording of the Act required the conditions as worded in Paragraph (2), above, to be met as the result of insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy The new wording of the Act, as amended, still requires the same conditions as worded in Paragraph (2), above, but those conditions could, after the changes, also be a result of natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition and only if domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order. By provisions in the amended act, Congress was granted the right to be informed immediately and every 14 days thereafter during the exercise of federal authority under these conditions.

en.wikipedia.org...

I am not quite sure what you are referring too since you are trying to evoke certain laws and acts yet you point to a definition of invasion that is not legalese. The laws are clear that an invasion or insurrection of the usa is only so if the invaders are armed and too much for police to handle.

What you claim about migrants not being able to apply for refugee status is bunk at best.

You guys seem to have your opinions swayed by the pics you have seen.

Well here's a pic you might not have seen on your right wing new sites.

a reply to: CharlesT

Got any proof?

a reply to: CharlesT

probably staged/scripted as well.

Proof?

The gas is far in the background and nowhere near this woman... Pfft.

Impossible to tell distance from a photo. Your fear and bias are showing.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Arnie123

Do you have proof that this women and her kids are fake?

sigh, this is a bit sad to have to explain, but it appears it's needed. See, the MSM doesn't just post news stories, they drive public opinion based on what "reality" they wish to show you. As in this case, the majority of those in the caravan are young men. In the pictures shown all over, there are very few women and children. But the MSM doesn't want "that" narrative, they prefer the other one.

So they are trying to advance the idea that who is really being abused here are women and kids just looking for a better life and open borders would be the kind hearted way to go. It's not a lie, but it's also not in context, which is a type of lie.

If you need more explanation, please be specific, so we can all help you gain the knowledge you really need.

originally posted by: TheOne7
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The original wording of the Act required the conditions as worded in Paragraph (2), above, to be met as the result of insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy The new wording of the Act, as amended, still requires the same conditions as worded in Paragraph (2), above, but those conditions could, after the changes, also be a result of natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition and only if domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order. By provisions in the amended act, Congress was granted the right to be informed immediately and every 14 days thereafter during the exercise of federal authority under these conditions.

en.wikipedia.org...

I am not quite sure what you are referring too since you are trying to evoke certain laws and acts yet you point to a definition of invasion that is not legalese. The laws are clear that an invasion or insurrection of the usa is only so if the invaders are armed and too much for police to handle.

What you claim about migrants not being able to apply for refugee status is bunk at best.

Trump told them to use the word invasion, and they dare not disobey his orders.
It's all about fear.

a reply to: network dude

Thank you! That was more my point about this post. The predictability of the MSM and what they want people to see and what they do to sway that opinion.

Yes, there are those of us on ATS that know not to trust MSM, hello we are here right.. but the sad fact is that most Americans DO get their news from MSM and believe crap like this.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
You guys seem to have your opinions swayed by the pics you have seen.

Well here's a pic you might not have seen on your right wing new sites.

This is not a picture of the current batch of criminal refugees. Is it? Have you got proof?

a reply to: network dude

I asked for proof that this photo was fake. As expected you have none.

the MSM doesn't just post news stories, they drive public opinion based on what "reality" they wish to show you.

Your right, fox news does have you running scared with their fake news about ALL MALE immigrants are bad.

Look at the original photo. Notice that there are no other people in the immediate area and all of the real action is hundreds of yards behind her at the border wall? Scripted much. Deny it if you will but it's fairly clear for me.
Can't actually be proven or not from our perspective but nothing is beyond CNN and the leftist agenda.

Impossible to tell distance from a photo. Your fear and bias are showing.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Yes you can. Look at the shadows. If you can't realistically justify your statements, don't even try. But, but, but won't get it here.