Sunspot Observatory Closed Over Child Porn

Story is gone from Fox unless you google it.

HUMMMM!!!!

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: notsure1

That would be, no.

Ok then. How about some hints..

Webcam feed to near by airforce bases.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Sounds to me like the feds had someone on the inside at the observatory monitoring some piece of equipment that they then extracted along with the person.

If that’s the case I wonder what kind of equipment it was?

Part of me thought that maybe the feds were running a CP website out of there as a honeypot to catch people who are trading in it. But then, why the big show of force closing the area down? Why evacuate the post office and houses that are surrounding it? They could just send in a maintenance van and remove the equipment under everyones nose if they wanted.

Whatever it is, the feds wanted someone to see what they were doing.

a reply to: notsure1

originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
The dude not being able to go back in his home, screams they want to keep him from the home for a reason,
the equipment taken from the towers

originally posted by: underwerks
Sounds to me like the feds had someone on the inside at the observatory monitoring some piece of equipment that they then extracted along with the person.

If that’s the case I wonder what kind of equipment it was?

Sure does, doesn't it.

originally posted by: Archivalist
This janitor sounds like the perfect non-scientist fall guy.

Pro-tip from my last job: Don't be the only guy in your department without a "family". Don't have a wife and kids? Get yourself an improv group and make them. If you are the only person with no fam fam, and sh** hits the fan fan? You are the fall guy.

Also, the single person is automatically expected to be available if anything needs to be done outside of normal business hours (late night, weekend, on a holiday, etc).

originally posted by: Zaphod58
Sure does, doesn't it.

So what, the janitor was an undercover operative testing some piece of electronic equipment, and this could only be done at the observatory?
Still doesn't make sense. Why close the post office and individual homes?
Was it OUR equipment, or was it placed there by outside actors?

Or... the equipment being monitored was at White Sands?

a reply to: Parishna

Well, upon reading a bit more about this..I have to agree

originally posted by: Zaphod58

originally posted by: underwerks
Sounds to me like the feds had someone on the inside at the observatory monitoring some piece of equipment that they then extracted along with the person.

If that’s the case I wonder what kind of equipment it was?

Sure does, doesn't it.

No it does not sound plausible to me with the available tech these days.

There would be no need to physically plant bugs to monitor web activities these days.

originally posted by: trollz
Still doesn't make sense. Why close the post office and individual homes?

Scrounge bags.

a reply to: howtonhawky

Who said anything about monitoring web activity or bugs.

a reply to: facedye

"i'm sorry, am i starting to finally lose it, or does anybody else find anything particularly odd about the FBI closing down an entire observatory for about a week and a half over something they could have potentially protected people from in one afternoon? "

Odd? Of course it sounds "Odd"; its entirely bogus! Its BS; its what they do! So, Odd?, Yes, unusual or unexpected? No. Since they originally stated it was for "security" reasons, I'm sticking with the Chinese hacked the systems theory.

originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist

originally posted by: trollz

originally posted by: UniformKilo
Why was the local Post Office closed as well? Did he use their WiFi as well. Smells like a fish, swims like a fish, it must be a bird...

The "pedophile" in question was probably trying to mail evidence of something to someone, hence being labelled a pedophile so that nobody would listen to him.

now that is an interesting theory, and would explain the post office closure

No it would not.

If they closed down every post office every time someone mailed something illegal then the po would go out of business.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: TheMadTitan

I've left all kinds of hints in the other thread, but so far no one has figured it out.

Are you claiming to have the answer or just speculation like the rest of us?

Why hint around like that?

If you have some type of clearance that allows you to know the truth then even hinting at it on social sites would revoke your clearance unless you were authorized to spread propaganda.

Be clear with us please.

Are you in the official loop of info or are you taking the piss here?

Observatory- We closed because of criminal activity.

Reaction- BS!

Observatory- We closed because of criminal activity involving child pornography.

Reaction- Oh that makes perfect sense.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: howtonhawky

Who said anything about monitoring web activity or bugs.

You keep trying to pretend you know something but there is no way the government lets some dude on the net inside their loop of knowledge.

You alluded to some type of monitoring equipment. now you are claiming it is not for web activity and that goes against the narrative being put forth of pedo.

It seems like you maybe gettin your jollies off here with us.

QUESTION...Were you onsite during the days of the shutdown at the place in question.

you remind me of a magician using slight of hand to deceive yet you do not have a history of deception

a reply to: howtonhawky

Because I'm not going to burn people that do know and do tell what is going on. I never have and I'm not going to start now. There's a fine line that can be walked but cross it and you screw someone.

Standard M.O. used to cover anything sensitive or damaging to the REAL power brokers. Slander the opposition with the most salacious, projectile vomit with explosive diarrhea sexual charges you can dream up. That way the sheep will be "wowwed" out of their minds and quickly turn their heads to not rubber-neck at the fatal traffic accident they're driving past.

a reply to: howtonhawky

And yet over many years of dropping hints, things I've been hinting at have been shown to be right far more often than wrong.