It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Text2016-11-02
INBOX: Hey big dummy you were supposed to stop by and unlock you computer so I could finish self assessment.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Kryties
Really? They didnt leak it?
Explain Hillary Clinton's 3 tweets up to October 31st referencing Trump and Russia then. If it wasnt leaked to her campaign then how did she know anything about it?
Maybe because she paid for it and knew what the dossier contained.
Do I look like Hillary?
Is Hillary the FBI?
Is Hillary Peter Strzok?
If the answers to these is "no" then I fail to see what that has to do with what I said? Hillary could have been making it up at the time, or acting on suspicion (of which there was plenty to go around ever since Trump publicly asked the Russians to hack Hillary - remember that?). Why is it that everyone jumps to knee jerk conclusions that seem based more on there own personal bias than actual facts?
So basically you could shut the f*** up and nobody would be any the wiser.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties
How exactly is this derailing Muellers investigation? Strzok is no longer a part of it (cause he's innocent....?).
originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: BlueAjah
Which clearly didn't happen. Nor did he, or the FBI, leak info that Trump was being investigated back during the campaign - which would have clearly damaged Trump. Why didn't they do this if the intent, that you're apparently deriving from the text messages, was to do the opposite? I've asked that twice now.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Kryties
It has everything to do with what you said and I never said you were her.
I pointed out the flaw in your claim the russia stuff was never leaked when in reality it was.
Try to prove Strzok bias ----> claim FBI bias -------> use those claims to demand access to Muellers files or use claims to disparage the investigation.
It's not hard for anyone with two eyes and half a brain to see that is what the Republicans are doing.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Kryties
You actually have no concern about the Justice Department being weaponized to overthrow the will of the people and influence an election?
What if this was reversed? Everyplace in this thread replace "Trump" with "Clinton" and vice versa. Then how would you feel?
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Kryties
It has everything to do with what you said and I never said you were her.
I pointed out the flaw in your claim the russia stuff was never leaked when in reality it was.
You're assuming, or insinuating, that Hillary got the information from the FBI when it could simply have come as a result of Trump publicly asking the Russians to hack her. Why make that assumption or insinuation?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Kryties
It has everything to do with what you said and I never said you were her.
I pointed out the flaw in your claim the russia stuff was never leaked when in reality it was.
You're assuming, or insinuating, that Hillary got the information from the FBI when it could simply have come as a result of Trump publicly asking the Russians to hack her. Why make that assumption or insinuation?
Because her tweets have nothing to say about what you just suggested.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Kryties
It has everything to do with what you said and I never said you were her.
I pointed out the flaw in your claim the russia stuff was never leaked when in reality it was.
You're assuming, or insinuating, that Hillary got the information from the FBI when it could simply have come as a result of Trump publicly asking the Russians to hack her. Why make that assumption or insinuation?
Because her tweets have nothing to say about what you just suggested.
Any chance you could post said tweets then and then clearly point out how she could only have obtained that information from the FBI and no other source?