It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
New bombshell documents released by the FBI.
Looks like Hillary Clinton's private system server was "lost" for a period of time.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
The server was at the FBI Operational Technology Office the whole time.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: soberbacchus
The server was at the FBI Operational Technology Office the whole time.
The real problem is that where the server was is actually meaningless. Whether it was there or not is moot because ANY AND ALL evidence obtained after the Chain of Custody was lost is inadmissable.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
Yep I am a bad typer
Better than being a shill cheering for corruption
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
Can you (or anyone) legally prove it was there for that entire 5 months?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
Can you (or anyone) legally prove it was there for that entire 5 months?
WHY?
Is that evidence being challenged in a court case somewhere?
You are asking defense attorney questions for a trial that never happened for an investigation that found nothing criminal and cleared HRC.
If DOJ was going to bring it trial, they would have sent an SA to the FBI Tech Ops center to find the original slip.
All emphases mine
The point: Digital evidence is evidence. It can have real impact on legal proceedings. So just as with physical evidence, it’s essential that law enforcement maintain a clear, documented chain of custody, just as it would for any other physical evidence. From the moment evidence is obtained, a trail must document how it has been handled, by whom, and for what purpose.
...
Without the right protections, digital files can be easily deleted, edited, even fabricated. So documenting a digital chain of custody is all the more important. A compromised chain can undo a legal proceeding and lay waste to years of investigation. And all a defense attorney has to do is successfully raise concerns about potential tainting of evidence – that alone is enough, let alone demonstrating actual taint.
Likewise, growing public skepticism about law enforcement raises the stakes for agencies to ensure that their handling of evidence is beyond reproach. “Chain of custody is the backbone, the foundation of everything that we do when handling evidence of any type,” said Dustin Sachs, a managing consultant in the legal technology solutions practice at Navigant Consulting.
...
For the FBI, the chain of evidence begins with hardware – the physical hard drive, phone camera or other device that may house evidentiary data. That hardware is tagged and locked up, and must be logged in and logged out by anyone who wants access to it.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law
Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?
The server was never lost.
Can you (or anyone) legally prove it was there for that entire 5 months?
WHY?
Is that evidence being challenged in a court case somewhere?
You are asking defense attorney questions for a trial that never happened for an investigation that found nothing criminal and cleared HRC.
If DOJ was going to bring it trial, they would have sent an SA to the FBI Tech Ops center to find the original slip.
Just because there has not been a trial yet, does not mean the evidence has been released.
It is being sotred at the FBI in the event it is needed in an trial as evidence. Otherwise, it would have been released to the owners by now, wouldn't it? Right?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus
What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus
What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.
Wow.
Move on.
Sad, desperate, OBSSESED.
Investigation over, no charges.