It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bearmonger
a reply to: BlueMule
You're right. Trump's affair 10 years ago with a porn star means I will forget why I voted for him and I'm all for the lefts agenda now. Bring on the open borders and the destruction of my country!
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: TinySickTears
What lawyer in their right mind wouldn't pay their client's alleged mistress a few hundred thousand for no particular reason (as a "gift") a few days before an election? That's just being a nice person, not using money to sway public opinion before an election! If you think so you're just un-American and probably a communist who wants everyone to have their guns taken away.
Leftist scum!
but i am willing to learn if you got some knowledge to share with me
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky
but i am willing to learn if you got some knowledge to share with me
Hey, I'm really not trying to be a dick..lol, but you are saying my opinion is is not relevant, while your's is. Fact is mine or your opinions are irrelevant in court..unless you're the judge, or an expert witness in a court proceeding.
The premise that she was on illicit drugs would be completely inadmissible, without corroborating evidence to back it up, such as a toxicology report, police report, extreme behaviour witnessed ..etc. None of that took place.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
This was a major non-issue before it even started, so any subsequent events that unfold are just as relevant.
So in other words, who cares?
She could be strung out on coke with a white ring around her nostrils and drunk off a 5th of vodka drooling from her mouth for I all care. Unless of course gossip is your thing.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
if it had come out 11 days before the election that could have swayed people to vote against him.
THAT is the problem
pay her off. shut her up. try to sway it in my favor or at least stop it from going against me
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky
60 f'ing minutes is not litigation
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: howtonhawky
And we're back to square one. That's already been gone over. Twice I think. Are you the type of person that needs to call Directory Assistance to get the number for 911?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
If the payoff wasn't to cover up something illegal, then the payoff itself wasn't illegal, either.