It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cynicalheathen
Since rifles in general account for less than 5% of all gun homicides, why not start by restricting handguns? Is it because the general populace is ignorant of facts and more likely to be willing to infringe rights because something is "scary"?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: face23785
What's madness is that it's perfectly okay to have strong security measures in a bunch of other places we take our kids like banks, airports etc, but somehow having it in schools is considered madness.
why is it still easier to get into a school than it is a courthouse?
ever hear of a mass shooting at a courthouse?
I will concede we don't value the safety of our children as much as we should; because if we did it would be harder to enter a school than an airport or a courthouse.
Taking away rights is not the answer, it is an agenda.
You should really stop and think how dumb the comparison you just made is. We don't regularly shuffle violent criminals in and out of schools who need to be watched at all times.
who is the dummy?
do they bring the criminals in the front door?
no they do not, they bring them in handcuffed in a even more secure entrance
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
Aww, do you have to pretend the gun owners are all pussies to make yourself feel better?
That's pathetic.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Thanks for the reply, without knowing how each of us identifies an assault its impossible to have a rational discussion about the topic.
I have an AR, I am open to the idea of further restriction on it but the problem I foresee is congress. Odds are high that instead of writing the regulations to specify the AR-15 they will instead write it to target semi-automatic weapons which opens up a huge can of worms for me.
As for my idea of an assault weapon, fire capability and is it used by the military. Yes I realize I am splitting hairs by saying the cousin of an M-4 is not an assault weapon, But its just the way I see it.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Krazysh0t
My Mossberg 500 is modable. I have a bright as # light on it. Ban those too?
Where did I call for banning anything? Please quote my words. I'll wait.
I guess you didn't see the question mark?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
a reply to: Edumakated
I was an Army officer. An AR-15 pretty much does the same thing in semi as an M-16. Oh, and we never used a 16 on full auto. So, pretty much the same thing.
Try and keep up.
Appealing to authority does not make a factual argument. Doing practically the same thing IS NOT the same thing.
Just come out and say you guys want to ban all semi-auto firearms which is the implication.
Fair enough bro. Didn't mean to come off as a jerk.
Thanks for your service.
Ok, sure.
Ban them.
No need for them from my point of view.
I shot two deer this fall with a bolt action.
No second shot with either. Why do I need semi? I know how to shoot.
Also, I am an authority, as I served in the forces that defended you and our way of life. A "thank you for your service " might be nice.
Or are you now in favor of disrespecting military officers?
So the right to self-defense should be limited to those who are an expert shot?
ETA: As a fellow vet, I don't think it's right you are trying to use your veteran status that way. Pointing out you're a vet with a lot of firearms experience is fine. Experience should be valued. But no one is disrespecting you, don't try to play that card. I'll thank you for your service.
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
Aww, do you have to pretend the gun owners are all pussies to make yourself feel better?
That's pathetic.
I am 55, and have made it to this age without ever needing a firearm to defend myself in the United States.
So yes, if you need a gun here you might want to put on a pink pussy hat, and March around Washington.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t
through the same security we should use in our schools,
are you actually going to act as if some schools do NOT have metal detectors or police?
ALL schools should have these!
It is only a matter of COST.
Why is that cost justified to protect judges and not our children?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Krazysh0t
My Mossberg 500 is modable. I have a bright as # light on it. Ban those too?
Where did I call for banning anything? Please quote my words. I'll wait.
I guess you didn't see the question mark?
I did. I guess you don't know what a leading question is, because you asked one.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Krazysh0t
My Mossberg 500 is modable. I have a bright as # light on it. Ban those too?
Where did I call for banning anything? Please quote my words. I'll wait.
I guess you didn't see the question mark?
I did. I guess you don't know what a leading question is, because you asked one.
Okay I'll rephrase counselor. Do you think modable firearms should be banned?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
Aww, do you have to pretend the gun owners are all pussies to make yourself feel better?
That's pathetic.
So apparently you think that every local government in the country has unlimited funds to implement draconian security measures in schools because you are scared of events that happen to less than 1% of the schools in the country.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t
it is better to take away rights than spend money on security
good day gun grabber
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
Aww, do you have to pretend the gun owners are all pussies to make yourself feel better?
That's pathetic.
I am 55, and have made it to this age without ever needing a firearm to defend myself in the United States.
So yes, if you need a gun here you might want to put on a pink pussy hat, and March around Washington.
Anything you've never experienced doesn't happen enough for people to be justified in protecting themselves against?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Krazysh0t
My Mossberg 500 is modable. I have a bright as # light on it. Ban those too?
Where did I call for banning anything? Please quote my words. I'll wait.
I guess you didn't see the question mark?
I did. I guess you don't know what a leading question is, because you asked one.
Okay I'll rephrase counselor. Do you think modable firearms should be banned?
I don't think any firearms should be banned. Unlike the right wing, I don't believe that the word restriction == ban.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Krazysh0t
My Mossberg 500 is modable. I have a bright as # light on it. Ban those too?
Where did I call for banning anything? Please quote my words. I'll wait.
I guess you didn't see the question mark?
I did. I guess you don't know what a leading question is, because you asked one.
Okay I'll rephrase counselor. Do you think modable firearms should be banned?
I don't think any firearms should be banned. Unlike the right wing, I don't believe that the word restriction == ban.
Restrictions such as?
That's just the way I see things. I really don't even want to totally ban assault rifles anyways. They look cool as # and are fun to shoot for target practice. I just want more comprehensive background checks on purchases, possibly a national database tracking serial numbers, and mandatory certification classes for gun training and storage for all buyers of guns that has to be maintained and updated. Is this going to stop all gun crime? Nope, but at least its a start instead of pretending like all these shootings are just the sacrifice that is necessary to have a gun culture.