It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: BelowLowAnnouncement
a reply to: DD2029
I looked into it... trust me. No need to reevaluate all the evidence.
Gonna have to be a no from me, stranger on the internet. Show your work.
This was part of the reason I retired form 9/11 truth movement.
Who's gonna believe no planes were used?
But why is it so hard to believe that the videos were edited and CGI was in fact used.
I'm sorry... but the case of the CGI/Holographic 9/11 still stands strong today... 100%.
at the very least, I'm a firm believer the airplanes or missiles used were not Boeing 757s.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
There's nothing "now" about it. Go diving through the Hoax forum index and you'll find threads that haven't been active since 2012 talking about no planes. It's been policy for years.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: BelowLowAnnouncement
a reply to: DD2029
I looked into it... trust me. No need to reevaluate all the evidence.
Gonna have to be a no from me, stranger on the internet. Show your work.
This was part of the reason I retired form 9/11 truth movement.
Who's gonna believe no planes were used?
But why is it so hard to believe that the videos were edited and CGI was in fact used.
I'm sorry... but the case of the CGI/Holographic 9/11 still stands strong today... 100%.
at the very least, I'm a firm believer the airplanes or missiles used were not Boeing 757s.
So no planes were used but they used planes or a missile.
what was holographic again then?
I'm just saying Boeings weren't used. 100% convinced too.
but still on the fence about what was used instead of the big Boeing airliners.
originally posted by: Pilgrum
a reply to: DD2029
I doubt there's any consensus among the posters.
A significant number are convinced all 4 attacks involved real planes, real people and real casualties, which the real evidence supports as well.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: DD2029
Look I had threads that obliterated the CGI, the "micronukes", the "melted" cars, and all that, I mean there was just no where left to run for the paid COINTELPRO professionals that wrecked havoc on this site to the degree of about shutting the rest of the 911 forum down with their concerted methods.
originally posted by: Protricity2k
Wow, you guys are incredible. Holograms???
CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI. CGI.
They used the same god damn shaky cam effect in every action movie since 9/11 and you bozos are still 100% convinced the shots were LIVE AND UNEDITED???????????????
Let me try this again:
THE PLANES ARE CGI, ADDED IN LATER. THE SHOTS ARE STILL SHOTS WITH WIDE ANGLE CAMERAS.
STOP BEING INCREDIBLE DUMB#S ABOUT THIS. ITS 2018
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
But in 2009, it was allowed to be discussed without being ditched in the hoax bin
www.abovetopsecret.com...