It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: DD2029
Yeah, except for all the witnesses that day.
Oh, they’re all in on it.
Suuure.
This is 2018, most of us aren’t that stupid.
originally posted by: Cauliflower
The UN made some money off the project, did the Masons profit?
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: DD2029
Yeah, except for all the witnesses that day.
Oh, they’re all in on it.
Suuure.
This is 2018, most of us aren’t that stupid.
I'm just saying it may have been something else besides a Boeing...
I never got closure on this subject... sorry.
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
But in 2009, it was allowed to be discussed without being ditched in the hoax bin
www.abovetopsecret.com...
F*ck yea, good find... let me read through this.
originally posted by: _BoneZ_
If we could fly into the hole, you would see most of the plane sitting up against the core. A few of the heavier parts like landing gear, engines and other parts, flew out the other side and landed on top of other buildings and the street below:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0dd99e287f0d.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0b31c22b7891.jpg[/atsimg]
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Lots of different photos you can pull up of this scene:
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DD2029
Even the people on the street who saw it with their own eyes?
The argument is that many of the 9/11 WTC 2nd tower crash videos were edited... and I want to know why. They were edited. period. end of discussion.... but why?