It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: DJW001
"Policy adviser" automatically implies some kind of official capacity. Otherwise you're just a friend.
Personally, I'd say you're better off letting the indictments roll out before hunting heads. Otherwise...you're simply hunting heads.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
The problem with your defense is the people who were charged committed their crimes between 2006 and ending in 2014. Kind of hard to be a policy advisor when Trump was not even elected, let alone having decided if he would even run for office.
These charges are a distraction from Clinton / DNC illegal activities and nothing more. I look forward to Mueller bringing similar charges against Democrats who committed the exact same crime, like both Podesta brothers.
If Mueller doesnt bring charges against anyone other than Trump people then he has confirmed what Trump and others have been saying all along. Also since Mueller is going on a fishing expedition into the past then that should also apply to Clinton and anyone else connected to her.
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to get Trump.
In that instance not only should Mueller and his staff be fired they should face prosecution for prosecutorial misconduct and malicious prosecution (just as Mueller and others on his team have done over the years).
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Personally, I'd say you're better off letting the indictments roll out before hunting heads. Otherwise...you're simply hunting heads.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
The problem with your defense is the people who were charged committed their crimes between 2006 and ending in 2014. Kind of hard to be a policy advisor when Trump was not even elected, let alone having decided if he would even run for office.
These charges are a distraction from Clinton / DNC illegal activities and nothing more. I look forward to Mueller bringing similar charges against Democrats who committed the exact same crime, like both Podesta brothers.
If Mueller doesnt bring charges against anyone other than Trump people then he has confirmed what Trump and others have been saying all along. Also since Mueller is going on a fishing expedition into the past then that should also apply to Clinton and anyone else connected to her.
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to get Trump.
In that instance not only should Mueller and his staff be fired they should face prosecution for prosecutorial misconduct and malicious prosecution (just as Mueller and others on his team have done over the years).
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Xcathdra
You can be a policy adviser without officially being part of the campaign. The Trumpsters are murdering truth.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Xcathdra
You can be a policy adviser without officially being part of the campaign. The Trumpsters are murdering truth.
Papadopoulos was an official advisor to the campaign. I pasted a Washington Post story in a thread yesterday showing what they said about him in March of 2016. The guy is all over the place. He might even have dirt on the Hillary campaign.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Xcathdra
You can be a policy adviser without officially being part of the campaign. The Trumpsters are murdering truth.
Papadopoulos was an official advisor to the campaign. I pasted a Washington Post story in a thread yesterday showing what they said about him in March of 2016. The guy is all over the place. He might even have dirt on the Hillary campaign.
what is proven now beyond a single shadow of a doubt, is that the Trump campaign through multiple associates worked directly with Russian agents directed by Vladimir Putin to influence the General Election 2016 and that is called collusion
originally posted by: JBurns
Gryphon66, you are absolutely being dishonest again.
what is proven now beyond a single shadow of a doubt, is that the Trump campaign through multiple associates worked directly with Russian agents directed by Vladimir Putin to influence the General Election 2016 and that is called collusion
That is NOT called collusion, because collusion does not exist in the context you're describing it. That is called nothing, because what you described is NOT a violation of any US law.
Furthermore, you lie and say this is a proven fact when it is the absolute opposite. I would write you off as a paid shill if not for the fact you've been here a few years, so that only leaves "obviously ignorant" as an option.
Do me a favor and research the word "collusion" in the US code. Come back and tell us all if you're being honest, or telling bold faced lies.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: JBurns
The word "collusion" is a euphemism that the press has been using for "conspiracy with a foreign power against the people of the United States." The indictment against Paul Manafort states it more succinctly: conspiracy. That is a crime. The issue is whether Donald Trump was aware that he was surrounding himself with traitors.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: JBurns
The word "collusion" is a euphemism that the press has been using for "conspiracy with a foreign power against the people of the United States." The indictment against Paul Manafort states it more succinctly: conspiracy. That is a crime. The issue is whether Donald Trump was aware that he was surrounding himself with traitors.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Personally, I'd say you're better off letting the indictments roll out before hunting heads. Otherwise...you're simply hunting heads.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
The problem with your defense is the people who were charged committed their crimes between 2006 and ending in 2014. Kind of hard to be a policy advisor when Trump was not even elected, let alone having decided if he would even run for office.
These charges are a distraction from Clinton / DNC illegal activities and nothing more. I look forward to Mueller bringing similar charges against Democrats who committed the exact same crime, like both Podesta brothers.
If Mueller doesnt bring charges against anyone other than Trump people then he has confirmed what Trump and others have been saying all along. Also since Mueller is going on a fishing expedition into the past then that should also apply to Clinton and anyone else connected to her.
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to get Trump.
In that instance not only should Mueller and his staff be fired they should face prosecution for prosecutorial misconduct and malicious prosecution (just as Mueller and others on his team have done over the years).
Maybe - From a legal aspect though if the investigations into Manafort and the others stemmed from the FISA warrants then the prosecutions will go no where as the judge will throw the case out since the evidence was illegally obtained.