It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Personally, I'd say you're better off letting the indictments roll out before hunting heads. Otherwise...you're simply hunting heads.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
The problem with your defense is the people who were charged committed their crimes between 2006 and ending in 2014. Kind of hard to be a policy advisor when Trump was not even elected, let alone having decided if he would even run for office.
These charges are a distraction from Clinton / DNC illegal activities and nothing more. I look forward to Mueller bringing similar charges against Democrats who committed the exact same crime, like both Podesta brothers.
If Mueller doesnt bring charges against anyone other than Trump people then he has confirmed what Trump and others have been saying all along. Also since Mueller is going on a fishing expedition into the past then that should also apply to Clinton and anyone else connected to her.
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to get Trump.
In that instance not only should Mueller and his staff be fired they should face prosecution for prosecutorial misconduct and malicious prosecution (just as Mueller and others on his team have done over the years).
Maybe - From a legal aspect though if the investigations into Manafort and the others stemmed from the FISA warrants then the prosecutions will go no where as the judge will throw the case out since the evidence was illegally obtained.
Why are you assuming the warrants were not obtained legally?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
Conspiracy requires 2 or more people working together to commit a crime. The commit a crime portion is where your "conspiracy" crime fails. Can you tell us what foreign national Trump worked with in order to commit a crime under US law?
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
Conspiracy requires 2 or more people working together to commit a crime. The commit a crime portion is where your "conspiracy" crime fails. Can you tell us what foreign national Trump worked with in order to commit a crime under US law?
That is the purpose of the investigation, isn't it? Why is Trump decrying it if he has nothing to hide?
originally posted by: burnsE
a reply to: DJW001
That depends on the integrity of the judge
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Deetermined
No the Podesta are not being investigated by Robert Mueller. This is trumps debacle. It's the Whitehouse.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
Conspiracy requires 2 or more people working together to commit a crime. The commit a crime portion is where your "conspiracy" crime fails. Can you tell us what foreign national Trump worked with in order to commit a crime under US law?
That is the purpose of the investigation, isn't it? Why is Trump decrying it if he has nothing to hide?
Why does the left keep pushing the lie when after 15 months no collusion is found?
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DJW001
Conspiracy requires 2 or more people working together to commit a crime. The commit a crime portion is where your "conspiracy" crime fails. Can you tell us what foreign national Trump worked with in order to commit a crime under US law?
That is the purpose of the investigation, isn't it? Why is Trump decrying it if he has nothing to hide?
Why does the left keep pushing the lie when after 15 months no collusion is found?
Correction: no charges of conspiracy have been filed... yet!
Correction: no charges of conspiracy have been filed... yet!