It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: rickymouse
So, science says it shouldn't exist. No wonder I don't pay attention to everything scientists say.
Scientists always get things wrong before they get them right. It's part of their quest, do experiments tirelessly until they narrow it down.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: BloodStainedGlass
Once again science proves it cannot be trusted, whats new?
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann take full credit for this thread. Among very many others...
Here's a paradox for you. If science cannot be trusted, why do you trust this report then? Confirmation bias?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Black_Fox
God is the force in the Universe that keeps our full understanding of nature just one step beyond our comprehension.
originally posted by: slider1982
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Black_Fox
God is the force in the Universe that keeps our full understanding of nature just one step beyond our comprehension.
And who created this "God" fellow you speak of?,....
RA
yes...and never mind if they railroad some poor fool who dared to tell them it's crap in the beginning.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Well the first part of that statement is right.
Jaden
originally posted by: 0bserver1
There shouldn't be a star after supernovae, yet there's either a neutron star or a black hole both spherical in form one's either black or white but still, there's something there. Houdini's grand finale.
Maybe everything that stops to exist within a three-dimensional world automatically turned into a two-dimensional object or maybe jumping to a four-dimensional or higher state of being " like taking a picture of your dog before dying and the picture is the only thing that exists although not for real only surreal?
originally posted by: stormcell
In some supernovae, it actually explodes into two expanding bubbles. How do we know our universe doesn't have an identical twin but with antimatter and matter ratios reversed.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Raggedyman
So this post was useless to the discussion except to insult.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: rickymouse
So, science says it shouldn't exist. No wonder I don't pay attention to everything scientists say.
Scientists always get things wrong before they get them right. It's part of their quest, do experiments tirelessly until they narrow it down.