It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: cooperton
Come now you claim to be a degreed individual. You can cope with multiple papers as sources. Assuming you are being honest about your education that is.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: cooperton
A year seriously? Students are assigned this as homework due the next day. Depending on how good they get 2 to 5 hrs. Ive had to go over 40 in a weekend. I thought you were a scientist you lied to us !
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Phantom423
I told you to look at the references. You didn't open them because you didn't have time to open them. This is a very long paper explaining the mechanics of a system.
Either address the paper as it is with the references, with the experimental data and the conclusions or admit that you do not have the ability to do it.
There are 102 references and you asked me to read them. You gave me a homework assignment that would take the average student a year. Narrow the question to a specific part of the paper. There are nothing but assumptions in the paper so I can't really spear a phantom.
originally posted by: Phantom423
I want to know what book or publication you got that information from (that photons behave as waves until they are observed and then they behave like particles)
Take note now that you are unaware of the double slit experiment, so when you quickly google it you can't patronize me with your pedestal talk. Here is the basic experiment explained:
originally posted by: cooperton
Just let me know which part of the paper you think proves evolution and I will make my rebuttal.
Every claim made in the paper resorts to a resource, of which there are 102.
I am not going to make such a tremendous effort for you guys to erroneously dismiss whatever I say.
Again, let me know which part of the paper you think proves evolution and I will make my rebuttal, one piece of evidence at a time.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: cooperton
Dodging again? Do the damned work, either be a scientist, as you claim to have been trained, or admit you are not such. Prove us wrong, and do the work.
Every claim made in the paper resorts to a resource, of which there are 102.
The nerve of those cretins! Who do they think they are actually supporting their claims with actual citations, let alone 102 citations supporting their conclusions with additional evidence.
Macro evolution can certainly be observed. It is why we use fruit flies or bacteria to do it with. You can see hundreds of generations over a short period of time so evolutionary changes can build up. For instance. The E. Coli Long-Term Evolution Experiment has witnessed the bacteria evolve to require aerobic citrate to survive (it should be noted that E. Coli not being able to survive in aerobic citrate is a defining feature of the bacteria to separate it from Salmonella).
Link
One possibility is that the Cit lineage activated a ‘‘cryptic’’ transporter (41), that is, some once-functional gene that has been silenced by mutation accumulation.
Link
The mutational activation of these genes suggests that they should be considered cryptic genes which have persisted in a silenced state since E. coli diverged from its Cit+ ancestor.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: cooperton
A year seriously? Students are assigned this as homework due the next day. Depending on how good they get 2 to 5 hrs. Ive had to go over 40 in a weekend. I thought you were a scientist you lied to us !
No one can read 102 research articles in a day. Nor would I Want to do that, only to have my conclusions blindly dismissed anyway. You guys don't believe someone who was risen from the dead, so you're not going to believe some random guy on the internet.
How did variable NK-cell receptors and MHC class I ligands influence immunity, reproduction and human evolution?
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Comparison of mouse and human genomes has shown that the biggest differences – in terms of both gene content and gene sequence -- occur in genes of the immune and reproductive systems
Link
The sequence of the mouse genome is a key informational tool for understanding the contents of the human genome and a key experimental tool for biomedical research.
Link
Why tests on mice may be of little use
Years of scientific research called into question as it is revealed that mice and men are genetically further apart than previously thought