Leaked FBI Memo Reveals Seth Rich Had DNC Documents On Laptop

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: drock905

If Rich were killed to prevent him from leaking the documents, why did the killer not take the laptop with the documents? This is classic "fake news."

I don't think it has been established that he had the laptop with him when he was killed.
The laptop may have been taken from his home by police during the investigation of his murder.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: drock905

If Rich were killed to prevent him from leaking the documents, why did the killer not take the laptop with the documents? This is classic "fake news."

I don't think it has been established that he had the laptop with him when he was killed.
The laptop may have been taken from his home by police during the investigation of his murder.

One would think. Computers are always a first port of call. Just like phones, tablets, diaries etc.

a reply to: UKTruth

You blindly believe anonymous sources that SAY there is a document and read it over to phone.

That is because the publication reporting the story stands to lose credibility, therefore readership, therefore money, if the source is not good. The blog publishing this "document" does not care about credibility. It stands to gain readership, therefore money, by affirming the beliefs of conspiracy theorists. Eventually, what publications like the New York Times say will see their day in court. What this blog says will never be confirmed, yet the believers will cling to it.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: drock905

If Rich were killed to prevent him from leaking the documents, why did the killer not take the laptop with the documents? This is classic "fake news."

I don't think it has been established that he had the laptop with him when he was killed.
The laptop may have been taken from his home by police during the investigation of his murder.

If he did not have the laptop, why kill him? Why not just break into his house and steal it?

The DNC have already proven themselves to be quite felonious and treacherous with people they consider the enemy. Add to that, many years of operating above the law just having big brass political connections, inducing fear in all kinds of people. Once a few untouchable scumbags like that get rolling there is no stopping them. Look at how brazen they were with Sanders, and look at the brazen arrogance and pompous manner of The people they make their "leader".

Someone highly connected in the DNC made it happen to S.R. Someone saw the log files and saw files copied and timestamps, and who was connected, IP addresses, and other identifiers linked to the laptop he used. Once the data was public there would be a mad dash to discover who it was before any police actions took place. someone'(s) in the NSA knows who did it.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

You blindly believe anonymous sources that SAY there is a document and read it over to phone.

That is because the publication reporting the story stands to lose credibility, therefore readership, therefore money, if the source is not good. The blog publishing this "document" does not care about credibility. It stands to gain readership, therefore money, by affirming the beliefs of conspiracy theorists. Eventually, what publications like the New York Times say will see their day in court. What this blog says will never be confirmed, yet the believers will cling to it.

What? They stand to lose credibility if they show a document, but not if they report words from a document that were read over the phone to them and push the story as true???

Stunning mental gymnastics.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: drock905

If Rich were killed to prevent him from leaking the documents, why did the killer not take the laptop with the documents? This is classic "fake news."

I don't think it has been established that he had the laptop with him when he was killed.
The laptop may have been taken from his home by police during the investigation of his murder.

If he did not have the laptop, why kill him? Why not just break into his house and steal it?

It was already leaked, what would be the point?

a reply to: drock905

Just to clear up some confusion...

There are a few police agencies in the DC metro area.

The DC metro police are your standard agency responsible for day to day calls in the district.

The Capital Police, whose chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened, is not a member of the DC Metro police. The Capital police are a completely separate entity and are responsible for protecting Congress / Congressional facilities.

DC Metro is responsible for the Seth Rich assassination.
The Capital Police are involved with the DWS laptop and the Pakistani IT guys and the security breach.

* - US Capital Police
* - DC Metro Police

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: drock905

If Rich were killed to prevent him from leaking the documents, why did the killer not take the laptop with the documents? This is classic "fake news."

I don't think it has been established that he had the laptop with him when he was killed.
The laptop may have been taken from his home by police during the investigation of his murder.

If he did not have the laptop, why kill him? Why not just break into his house and steal it?

To stop any further leaking? If he is dead, he doesn't leak anything more... excepting a dead man switch.... but if he was already leaking?


Why would the mob kill a guy for not repaying a loan that they made to him? To make an example out of him.

Maybe it was a robbery gone wrong.
Why kill him and take nothing?

a reply to: drock905

You might find this vid on the document useful Not sure if this may be the main story behind the redacted document . I may have been created to divert attention away from what will be released over the next two days .

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: drock905

You might find this vid on the document useful

Thanks. yes very useful... some healthy scepticism and a wait and see attitude.

I wasn't aware of this until this story broke and I checked Joe Biggs twitter post on it, but someone replied with a conversation they had via Twitter DM with Guccifer 2. In it Guccifer 2 actually confirms Seth Rich as the whistleblower directly. This is important because a Twitter conversation between the same Guccifer 2 and Roger Stone was part of the whole media circus linking Roger Stone to wikileaks, so you'd assume that this would be relevant to the same media



twitter.com...

here is the link to the full 68 pages of conversations that this person had with Guccifer_2

www.robbinyoung.info...

If it's a leak, then wouldn't it NOT be redacted

WHAT IF ITS LEGIT, with a top side of cover you a$$

Why is the "H" and "R" of Seth Rich redacted?

I am positive its a fake. There is no classification level classified. Its Unclassified, Confidential, Secret and Top secret. The classified at the top and bottom are slightly off center like they cut off the letters "UN". They didnt redact keywords and the way the name was redacted. FBI would never partially redact a name like in the document. If it was redacted for public release it would be marked as such.

Over all 100% fake.

a reply to: UKTruth

That happened after his death btw. Easy pickings for hackers to use him after his death.

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: UKTruth

That happened after his death btw. Easy pickings for hackers to use him after his death.

Sure but it is the only time I know of that one of the publishers of the DNC and Podesta emails has stated directly it was Seth who gave them the material. If they really wanted to use Seth Rich as cover, wouldn't they be a bit more vocal about it?

Simple question.
Why would the FBI have this mans laptop?
Why would the FBI be involved in a DC street murder?

Same answer for both questions.

They wouldn't.


Hey pizza anyone I hear there's a shop ...with a basement...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Simple question.
Why would the FBI have this mans laptop?
Why would the FBI be involved in a DC street murder?

Same answer for both questions.

They wouldn't.


Hey pizza anyone I hear there's a shop ...with a basement...

The FBI provides assistance to the DC Metro Police when it comes to evidence processing. The only other reason the FBI would be involved is if a crime fell within one of the joint task forces.

In this case no task force is needed for a "botched robbery" and I am unsure as to why the FBI would need to process evidence from a "botched robbery". One would think if Seth had his laptop with him that it would have been taken.

a reply to: drock905

Oh snap. Is that true?

a reply to: D8Tee

Yeah sure.
Why would the police need to
1) keep a laptop of a murder victim.
2) need to break into said laptop if it belonged to a victim?

Logic fail.

Can't you guys tell fantasy from reality?