Seven in 10 Brits support 'world government' to protect humanity from global catastrophes

This poll proves 7 out of 10 british people are really stupid.

But Americans already knew that.

When Rajubabi in a mud hut takes your I T job for 25 cents an hour, that you paid 64k for training for, and a politician made 20 mill in payoffs, and a bank won't drop your mortgage to 29.95, you will understand why a one world market is unsustainable.

Hell, you couldn't even go live in a mud hut if you wanted to here, it's illegal almost everywhere. You would be forced into welfare or die. Maybe that's the design?

We have worked hard for the American lifestyle, and it is going downhill fast. A race to the bottom, the lowest labor in the world is the only push for this.

It's not for some niceguy one love gd hippy alien fighter moral crusade.

...And dollars to donuts this "poll" is propaganda. If not, they are not being informed they will lose their place in the job market and compete with poor third world countries. As in the ones who work for $600 a year, and poop in buckets.

It's incredibly disingenuous to quote percentages without giving the numbers first.

Are we talking like 10 people? 3 billion people? What?

Small demographics don't always have the same ideas as the majority. If Brits are so 'keen' to go global why did we quit the EU hmmmmmm? Think about that......

I doubting the poll to be honest. It's not enough people to give such a consensus in a nation with such differences. Were divided in opinion by whether your from the north or the south. If your working class or council class. Or quite simply on age.

I'd also reckon those asked didn't really get the question. Most people iv spoke to recently, especially about brexit didn't seem clued up and sometimes had completely misunderstood how certain aspects worked.

I personally think on a global scale we do need to work better together. Where possible we should try to prevent genocide and such atrocities occurring. Also try to stop us wiping out the rest of the species on this planet.

But I'd also like to see powers devolved further back to the people. Ie the creation of smaller countries or states within side the existing ones. So in the case of the uk maybe break England up into mercia, northumbria, wessex and anglia. Each of these nations along with the scots and Welsh could work together on security (military and such). Whereas each could have control over taxes in there areas and how the money is spent. Ie they could have different corporate tax and personal tax levels in order to improve local economies.

People should have more direct power over how a nations wealth is spent. In order to have a slightly fairer society for all.

a reply to: Funem


Regular civilians of Britain are good people like everywhere else.

This is just a bogus poll by their wicked lords.

The most meddling government in the world.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

I've never really understood the destain felt for the concept of a one world government...

One world government means no more war.. you could have rebellions, but no more of the nation vs nation stuff..

You eliminate the risk of a global nuclear war.. only one nuclear power, means there is never a Russia vs US type Armageddon...


That alone makes it the lesser of 2 evils..

I think the main problem with governments has never been government as a concept..

It has been corruption due to little or no oversight.. well now we have the tech to eliminate corruption by tracking every dollar..

I bet anyone who lived through either WW would agree with me..

originally posted by: Mandroid7
When Rajubabi in a mud hut takes your I T job for 25 cents an hour, that you paid 64k for training for, and a politician made 20 mill in payoffs, and a bank won't drop your mortgage to 29.95, you will understand why a one world market is unsustainable.

Hell, you couldn't even go live in a mud hut if you wanted to here, it's illegal almost everywhere. You would be forced into welfare or die. Maybe that's the design?

We have worked hard for the American lifestyle, and it is going downhill fast. A race to the bottom, the lowest labor in the world is the only push for this.

It's not for some niceguy one love gd hippy alien fighter moral crusade.

...And dollars to donuts this "poll" is propaganda. If not, they are not being informed they will lose their place in the job market and compete with poor third world countries. As in the ones who work for $600 a year, and poop in buckets.

Why would a one world government ensure
The problems you listed???

All of those are present in every government separately...

So not exactly something that is a unique risk to a single world power..

I think tech has reached a point now where we could track every dollar and almost eliminate corruption..

originally posted by: Disturbinatti
a reply to: Funem


Regular civilians of Britain are good people like everywhere else.

This is just a bogus poll by their wicked lords.

The most meddling government in the world.

One government means an end to war.. and eliminating the risk of a global war between 2 nuclear powers..

Only one nuclear power means you never have nuclear Armageddon.. that alone makes it the lesser of 2 evils..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Disturbinatti
a reply to: Funem


Regular civilians of Britain are good people like everywhere else.

This is just a bogus poll by their wicked lords.

The most meddling government in the world.

One government means an end to war.. and eliminating the risk of a global war between 2 nuclear powers..

Only one nuclear power means you never have nuclear Armageddon.. that alone makes it the lesser of 2 evils..

Actually two nuclear powers means you will never have nuclear armageddon. If one state possesses all the nuclear weapons in the world they can, and will, use them to their heart's content to force their dominion.

We do not need a world government. We can have A big legitimate nonprofit organization that can look over disasters. We need to get this organization to not waste money and to stop all the red tape. It has to be neutral and help everyone, but not be involved in repairing any personal homes or paying doctors salaries for their work. There is too much corruption in our present programs that needs to be straightened out.

National Sovereignty and Nationalism are not going away as much as the globalists would like it to. There will be war if this is attempted.

originally posted by: Ohanka

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Disturbinatti
a reply to: Funem


Regular civilians of Britain are good people like everywhere else.

This is just a bogus poll by their wicked lords.

The most meddling government in the world.

One government means an end to war.. and eliminating the risk of a global war between 2 nuclear powers..

Only one nuclear power means you never have nuclear Armageddon.. that alone makes it the lesser of 2 evils..

Actually two nuclear powers means you will never have nuclear armageddon. If one state possesses all the nuclear weapons in the world they can, and will, use them to their heart's content to force their dominion.

What?!?!


Lol, you are slap crazy lol..

Every nuclear power (including the US) , every new administration is a dice roll until we crap out and get another hitler...

What are there a dozenish nuclear powers ??

So how many dice rolls is that every century??

Long term it is a near certainty...

Now to part 2...

How would only one nuclear power ever equate to a global nuclear war???

If there is only one nuclear power you would never have the 10,000 vs 10,000 nukes you would have if Russia and the us launched..

There is no worst case scenerio than that...

Hitler ruling the world, or a nuclear Armageddon???

Hitler wins hands down..


One wold power might launch one nuke here or there to put down a rebellion... there is never a need for one power to nuke the whole planet..

a reply to: starwarsisreal

Why should we be surprised? Where as England gone in a 100 years? Two world wars they would have lost without outside help and an stagnating if not dwindling economy that has offered little hope for the down-trodden for decades. Good Lord, the Germans lost both wars and where are they today?

I don't claim that the US is in far better shape, merely behind the UK in the falling away from being a robust nation. Yes, it is time for a world government. Much of Europe needs it severely, the sooner the better before another eruption of one group against another.

a reply to: Aliensun

Then who is doing it right???

Because it's pretty well established that the reason the US became dominant, is because we were the last modern inferstructure left standing after WW2. ..and both sides had steadily borrowed money , leading to the establishment of the dollar as the standard currency..

Previous to that Britain was the most powerful country on the planet, sans Germany, which became the worlds most powerful nation on the back of socialism....


I think your alluding to the wooden shoes /silk shoes dynamic..

A wooden shoe culture builds an empire.. becomes a silk shoe culture , then is a conquered by another wooden shoe culture...

Biut honestly modern historians don't really agree with that anymore..

Not because of this or that social policy..

originally posted by: The3murph
National Sovereignty and Nationalism are not going away as much as the globalists would like it to. There will be war if this is attempted.

It is already being chipped away at by international treaties and global corporations will make it happen sooner or later.

Where was the war over NAFTA?

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: The3murph
National Sovereignty and Nationalism are not going away as much as the globalists would like it to. There will be war if this is attempted.

It is already being chipped away at by international treaties and global corporations will make it happen sooner or later.

Where was the war over NAFTA?

Trump is a rejection of that. Only a fool WON'T see that.

a reply to: The3murph

That is hardly a war and it is 23 years later.

originally posted by: starwarsisreal

Nearly seven out of 10 people in the UK support the creation of a form of world government that would be able to force countries to deal with major risks facing the world such as climate change and nuclear weapons, according to a major new survey.

And 62 per cent said they considered themselves to be “a global citizen” in addition to being British, which will likely disappoint Theresa May who told the last Conservative conference “if you believe you are a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere”.

Some 88 per cent of respondents said they would be prepared to make changes that would affect their living standards to prevent catastrophic climate change in the future.

Nearly seven out of 10 people in the UK support the creation of a form of world government that would be able to force countries to deal with major risks facing the world such as climate change and nuclear weapons, according to a major new survey.

And 62 per cent said they considered themselves to be “a global citizen” in addition to being British, which will likely disappoint Theresa May who told the last Conservative conference “if you believe you are a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere”.

Some 88 per cent of respondents said they would be prepared to make changes that would affect their living standards to prevent catastrophic climate change in the future.

Apparently: 78.37% of statistics that appear on-line, are totally random.

Fake news, all the Brits I know never mention the NWO, don't even mention their own government, too busy getting on with life, I expect they know deep down its just another tax gathering scam...

Illogical. If "7 out of 10 Brits" really did back a One World Gov't - why'd they vote Brexit? The EU was essentially that and the UK hated being ordered to contribute more financially than other countries, hated being made to follow laws that did not suit them etc

If a One World Gov't is instated Western countries would have their living standards and economies eroded to prop up the 3rd world