It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: mOjOm
Also, by saying they're just cells, unlike you and I who are more than that?, was clearly stating his opinion about abortion.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: DanDanDat
Sure let's just leave out other details surrounding this same story so you can keep it within your narrative that you approve of now.
Wouldn't want other important information in that might skew your approved of narrative.
But yet you think the protestors are wrong too. So what is the problem???
That's all I'm saying as well.
originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: DanDanDat
Using your argument with the Vice Principal's logic, we should all be able to be killed at any time.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: TobyFlenderson
That last part about him being gay is also a real winner that you just had to throw in there I must say. I don't know where you get that he's gay either. Is that an actual fact or another one of your made up facts???
originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: DanDanDat
Obviously it's a debatable question that is dependent upon one's world view. That's why people protest on both sides. Science doesn't prove that a small collection of cells has any more or less worth or intrinsic value than a larger group of similar cells. Many religious views think that life is more than that. That's the conundrum. If you honestly believe as these young people seemingly do, then you believe abortion is murder. According to MLK, they have a moral obligation to protest legalized abortion.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: mOjOm
Also, by saying they're just cells, unlike you and I who are more than that?, was clearly stating his opinion about abortion.
In an odd way by saying that he also calls into question his philosophical point of view and his position in STEM.
Last time I checked I am "just cells" there's nothing more or less that make up my anatomy. As an Atheist I tend to agree that I am just cells and that's it. It's the religious/spiritual point of view that begins to question "are we more than just cells?" ... and if we are, as the assistant principal is contending, than who is to say when we become more than "just cells"...
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: burdman30ott6
1. He's not a student and if I remember right, they weren't on the school grounds.
2. Telling someone to shut up is still just him speaking. He didn't force them into silence. Those two kids were making false statements about him however by saying "He supports Murdering children." Which he never said. In fact he never said he was pro-choice or that he supported abortion at all. Just that he didn't want them spreading pro-life material at that school. So actually those kids were making false accusations about him to the public.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Meh typical right wing snowflake harrasing people, but hey what floats your boat.
I don't agree with the Christian dogma, but I do support free speech.
This is another typical liberal Authoritarian trying to shut down alternative views. You won't see so called 'right wing' people shutting down free speech like this fool.
Idk...
Telling other people's children your God is gonna kidnap their souls and torture them for all eternity , if they don't play ball. Is kinda jacked up..
If your telling kids the intricacies of fellatio your gonna catch a little hell to.
originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: mOjOm
so, he was protecting them from free speech off of school property while still on the clock and being paid by Christian and non christian taxpayer money.He wasn`t being paid to enforce his political or religious views on anyone either on school property or off.
what he did was unethical, unprofessional and probably illegal, he CLEARLY wasn`t qualified to be a vice principle.
How do you know that those taxpayers weren't paying him to do exactly what he did???
because it`s illegal for a public servant to try to enforce their personal political or religious views on anyone while they are on the clock and being paid by the taxpayers.