It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Believing “immigration status should not affect our rights,” a group of immigrant advocates released a list of demands for Charlotte and Mecklenburg County officials on Wednesday, most of which call for protecting and giving benefits to people in the country illegally.
Among the demands: ending all Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police motor-vehicle checkpoints and decriminalizing “minor” offenses such as driving under the influence of alcohol.
The list was created by the Southeast Asian Coalition, Comunidad Colectiva and Alerta Migratoria, all of which are pushing city and county leaders to defy laws that call for the arrest and deportation of people who are in the country illegally. In Mecklenburg County, experts estimate that could be as many as 54,000 people.
Believing “immigration status should not affect our rights,” a group of immigrant advocates released a list of demands for Charlotte and Mecklenburg County officials on Wednesday, most of which call for protecting and giving benefits to people in the country illegally.
originally posted by: slider1982
Mark my words, the moment you make what was a previous serious crime "more minor" you are on a slippery slope.. Case in point is Europe and London in particular, they did in the late 90's and I have seen a massive increase in peoples attitudes to offences. People steal knowing they will get away with it, youths use the fact they are under 18 and not subject to the same procedures as a adult. Really this subject would need its own thread!!!...
I would ask anyone that has lost someone to drink driving what they think???, is it a good idea, next it would be driving under the influence of drugs!! and so the goal post move again.
The sad fact to all this is the very first point of the argument, defending people that are in the country illegally, I would be sh1tting myself if I was illegally in country, let a lone driving as how would you gain a legal licence? yet this situation is not meant to be addressed???..
I can only think the current rhetoric where we see foreign nationals flooding in really is straight out of a conspiracy theory of attempting to water down the local population to a multi cultural soup that in the long will be easier for the higher up's to manipulate...
RA
Mark my words, the moment you make what was a previous serious crime "more minor" you are on a slippery slope.. Case in point is Europe and London in particular, they did it the late 90's and I have seen a massive increase in peoples attitudes to offences. People steal knowing they will get away with it, youths use the fact they are under 18 and not subject to the same procedures as a adult. Really this subject would need its own thread!!!...
originally posted by: underwerks
I completely support the banning of road blocks. Drunk driving doesn't need to be decriminalized though, that's kind of weird.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: underwerks
I completely support the banning of road blocks. Drunk driving doesn't need to be decriminalized though, that's kind of weird.
Can you give a solid argument for doing away with road blocks?
In 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that, despite their “intrusion on individual liberties,” being stopped in a DUI checkpoint does not violate a person’s Fourth Amendment’s protection from unreasonable searches and seizures. Despite this ruling, drivers continue to challenge the legality of DUI checkpoints, asking one very persistent question: are DUI checkpoints unconstitutional?
However, as several dissenting judges pointed out, the Constitution doesn’t make room for exceptions and, whether beneficial or not, DUI checkpoints are a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment, forcing drivers to participate in “suspicionless investigatory seizures.”
Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to leave it up to each state to determine whether law officers could use DUI checkpoints to apprehend suspected drunk drivers. Following this ruling, eleven states passed laws to prohibit roadblocks, while the remaining 39 states continued to allow them.
originally posted by: Lolliek
I don't understand how some people think they are "entitled" for everything! Gimme, gimme, gimme. If you want to live here, come in legally. And as someone whose entire life changed in a couple of seconds by a drunk driver, I think making it a minor crime is ludicrous. While we're at it, make rape minor too! And what the heck? Stealing and prostitution are "survival" crimes? Let's just make gangs "social clubs!"
Wow. Just wow. 😡