It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Revolution9
How do you want to be treated, yourself?
As a human?
originally posted by: rockintitz
Everything is sexist
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Revolution9
How do you want to be treated, yourself?
As a human?
originally posted by: savemebarry
Any man who treats a woman he is with any less than he would treat his brother, is not a man.
originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: Revolution9
George Orwell predicted Smart TVs. He called them "Telescreens". Remember, he wrote way back in 1947. They were TVs that never turned off properly, that could watch you back and listen to you. Little cameras follow you everywhere you go; at home, in the work place, online, everywhere in public. Bugged at every turn, we have unfortunately given up our freedom willingly. About Aldous Huxley;
en.wikipedia.org...
Huxley wrote an introduction to the posthumous publication of J. D. Unwin's 1940 book Hopousia or The Sexual and Economic Foundations of a New Society.[30] On 21 October 1949, Huxley wrote to George Orwell, author of Nineteen Eighty-Four, congratulating him on
"how fine and how profoundly important the book is". In his letter to Orwell, he predicted:
Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience.[31]
I am reading again "1984". I have just ordered "Brave New World" by Huxley. I am doing that because I think these men will empower me as we drift blindly into a very uncertain AI age where we need to keep our political/social wits about us. If it goes down we will all go down. We need some watch out people; artists and social commentators who can see the dangers and steer us clear as we sail these treacherous waves of freedom in the new age.
Social comment away, everybody, everywhere!!!
originally posted by: GreenGunther
originally posted by: savemebarry
Any man who treats a woman he is with any less than he would treat his brother, is not a man.
Do you know how brothers treat each other? Because no lady would want to be treated like that.
Some ladies are dirt, others are queens.
I'll treat them accordingly.
36. Words with “man” in them
According to the Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Program website at the University of Pittsburg, words like “mankind,” “freshman” and “chairman” are sexist.
Campus Reform reports: “'Terms to Use to Avoid Sexist Language’ are also included in an attempt to steer students away from using words like ‘mankind,’ ‘chairman,’ and ‘freshman.’ Instead, they ought to be replaced with gender-neutral options such as ‘humankind,’ ‘chair or chairperson,’ and ‘first year student.’”
originally posted by: GreenGunther
originally posted by: savemebarry
Any man who treats a woman he is with any less than he would treat his brother, is not a man.
Do you know how brothers treat each other? Because no lady would want to be treated like that.
Some ladies are dirt, others are queens.
I'll treat them accordingly.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: WilsonWilson
Okay, well I'll just call you "woman" and talk to you like a man?
Or should I say, "hey lady"; or is "hey chick" better? How about "hey you with the brown hair and red shirt your tire is flat"??
Even "hey buddy" doesn't seem right to me.
And then, instead of endear with a term like "yes, m'lady', what do I replace that with?
Genders are real. It's not a conspiracy! Boys will be boys; girls will be girls. It doesnt mean that boys and girls cant be civil and enjoy the game.
72. Running against Hillary Clinton
A feminist reporter from the New York Times suggested that it was sexist for Bernie Sanders to run against Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primary, as it might have blocked Hillary from becoming the first female nominee of a major party.
77. Not supporting Hillary Clinton for president
If you don’t support the candidate with a uterus, and you have a uterus, there is a special place in hell for you. Of course, if you’re a man and don’t support Hillary, you’re obviously pro-female-oppression and can’t stomach the thought of a uterus occupying the White House.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Revolution9
I am not going to read through all the replies .