It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Probability Of Bankruptcy Analysis
For stocks, Probability Of Bankruptcy is normalized value of Z-Score. For funds and ETFs it is derived from a multi-factor model developed by Macroaxis. The score is used to predict probability of a firm or a fund experiencing financial distress within next 24 months. Unlike Z-Score, Probability Of Bankruptcy is the value between 0 and 100 indicating the actual probability the firm will be distressed in the next 2 fiscal years.
GrubHub
Probability Of Bankruptcy
=
Normalized
Z-Score
=
62 %
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: network dude
he's not saying that to the trump supporters, he's just saying if you can't park the hateful rhetoric at the door, please don't come through the doorway!!
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: kaylaluv
The only real difference here is that in some cases, employers knew they were going to have to fire employees due to the demands of Obamacare, and they faced a touch choice. For some of them, they decided to let go those employees who voted basically for the policy by supporting it at the ballot box. It was fairer than letting go those who did what they could to vote against it.
This guy is just firing people for being Trump supporters, period.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: network dude
he's not saying that to the trump supporters, he's just saying if you can't park the hateful rhetoric at the door, please don't come through the doorway!!
Sure didn't sound like it to me.
Sounds like he hates america and all it stands for.
Flag burning at the beginning of each shift!
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: EchoesInTime
Your constitution?
Your president fully intends to wipe his arse with that document, which will likely as not be the closest he ever comes to reading the thing. No one who supports Trump can legitimately claim the document as their shield, when most of his most widely touted policies involved total violation of its contents.
Hypocrisy at its most gigantic... It would be laughable if it were not actually happening.
I know you are a bit better than this. Trump was elected on Tuesday night. I really don't think we have had a very good look at how well his presidency, which has these cool things called "checks and balances" attached to it, might look like.
Perhaps we could give him until his second day or so to lambaste him?
His website shows his misguided and vague plans. He had months to say what he is going to do and kept hanging his mind.
Instead, he just caused a great division and heightened racial tensions. He had his chance to show rational plans.
The plans are not rational, but his supporters did not care. They cared more about his right to say he could grab women by the you know where.
We've had 8 years of Obama. I think we can all give the man a little time to nail down some specifics.
Trump has had his entire campaign to nail down specifics. Traditionally, people do that beforehand.
But trump supporters wanted to pick 'unknown box number 2'.
If it should be that easy, I would have ran. I would have been socially liberal, financially conservative, and pro 1st and 2nd ammendment. I would have written it all down, specifically. It is not supposed to be run, tweet a lot, change your mind a lot, rile up the alt right and win.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
You're right, those awful lefties...
A Cedar City, UT employer chose to lay-off two workers because they voted for the man responsible for implementing this country’s new healthcare laws, which he is clearly no fan of.
www.blackenterprise.com...
During a broadcast of The Dennis Miller Show, the conservative host talked to an alleged small business owner named Tony. Miller advised him to investigate his employees to see which ones are Obama supporters and then fire them no matter how good of a worker they are.
www.addictinginfo.org...
www.facebook.com...
Terry Lee Forensics to Iron County Sheriff's Office
January 22, 2013 ·
..
Just for the record:
For those of you who have had the opportunity to read the newspaper article originating in the Salt Lake Tribune, here are some interesting facts regarding the article:
1. I am the sole-proprietor of this business and I have no employees.
2. No employees were fired.
3. For a number of years I have been performing digital forensics as a sole operator Private Investigator in the state of Utah.
4. I have decided to expand operations outside the state of Utah by starting this company which began operating on January 8, 2013. (Terry Lee Forensics)
5. I would never fire anyone based on how they vote. Voting in this country is a right we should all be proud to exercise.
I realize we all tend to believe the printed word, however, sometimes things are not always as they appear.
Terry Lee
Terry Lee Forensics
originally posted by: BlueAjah
This is a public company.
I hope this guy realizes that his comments are likely to affect his business negatively.
It will have the same result that Hillary's "deplorable" comment had.
Driving off a portion of your clientele in this manner is seriously bad business sense.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: EchoesInTime
Your constitution?
Your president fully intends to wipe his arse with that document, which will likely as not be the closest he ever comes to reading the thing. No one who supports Trump can legitimately claim the document as their shield, when most of his most widely touted policies involved total violation of its contents.
Hypocrisy at its most gigantic... It would be laughable if it were not actually happening.
I know you are a bit better than this. Trump was elected on Tuesday night. I really don't think we have had a very good look at how well his presidency, which has these cool things called "checks and balances" attached to it, might look like.
Perhaps we could give him until his second day or so to lambaste him?
His website shows his misguided and vague plans. He had months to say what he is going to do and kept hanging his mind.
Instead, he just caused a great division and heightened racial tensions. He had his chance to show rational plans.
The plans are not rational, but his supporters did not care. They cared more about his right to say he could grab women by the you know where.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: EchoesInTime
Your constitution?
Your president fully intends to wipe his arse with that document, which will likely as not be the closest he ever comes to reading the thing. No one who supports Trump can legitimately claim the document as their shield, when most of his most widely touted policies involved total violation of its contents.
Hypocrisy at its most gigantic... It would be laughable if it were not actually happening.
I know you are a bit better than this. Trump was elected on Tuesday night. I really don't think we have had a very good look at how well his presidency, which has these cool things called "checks and balances" attached to it, might look like.
Perhaps we could give him until his second day or so to lambaste him?
His website shows his misguided and vague plans. He had months to say what he is going to do and kept hanging his mind.
Instead, he just caused a great division and heightened racial tensions. He had his chance to show rational plans.
The plans are not rational, but his supporters did not care. They cared more about his right to say he could grab women by the you know where.
His positions have become really quite clear.
As for his rhetoric, I am yet to hear anything he said that warranted all the nonsense.
The most hateful and divisive rhetoric in the entire campaign was that which he received, and that which his supporters received. Still, time to move on I would suggest.
originally posted by: Lysergic
Probability Of Bankruptcy Analysis
For stocks, Probability Of Bankruptcy is normalized value of Z-Score. For funds and ETFs it is derived from a multi-factor model developed by Macroaxis. The score is used to predict probability of a firm or a fund experiencing financial distress within next 24 months. Unlike Z-Score, Probability Of Bankruptcy is the value between 0 and 100 indicating the actual probability the firm will be distressed in the next 2 fiscal years.
GrubHub
Probability Of Bankruptcy
=
Normalized
Z-Score
=
62 %
www.macroaxis.com...
lulz