It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: SaturnFX
You said:
We have most big things figured out
These big things are the reason Science has so many different theories to try and explain the little things and there's still no agreement on those things.
Sadly, some people try to use Science to support their belief and they make blanket statements which have no basis in reality.
originally posted by: Dr X
Our purpose is to propogate our genes then ensure their survival.
Until you return to that ground yourself, dead and buried;
you started out as dirt, you’ll end up dirt.
The soul that sins is the soul that dies.
Humans and animals come to the same end—humans die, animals die. We all breathe the same air. So there’s really no advantage in being human. None. Everything’s smoke. We all end up in the same place—we all came from dust, we all end up as dust.
having [the same] hope in God which these men cherish themselves, that there shall certainly be a resurrection of [the dead], both of the righteous and of the wicked.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: chr0naut
Are you expecting physical evidence for things beyond physicality?
If there is no possibility of evidence given, then why consider it?
There is possibility of evidence for ghosts, aliens, bigfoot, etc..and whenever discussing these things, we discuss the evidence. When people discuss deities, they discuss feelings, scripture that is meant to be "divinely inspired", etc. The biggest idea for evidence of deities (in monotheism / abrahamic religions) is Jesus if you are a christian..thats it...
and that is basically stories that are very suspect as to the authenticity of..and even then if its found the jesus of the bible did exist and everything is 100% dead on as to what happened..water to wine and raising from the dead, it still doesn't prove any deity..just proves a person with abnormal abilities claimed some stuff that even he was unable to give evidence for.
A bit like a record breaking runner saying he attributed his speed to zeus...is he right, or is it just a biological abnormality and his delusions because of it? could be a mix, but we only can study the biological part.
ok, this will be the last bit I address as I think this should clear it all up.
Think of things, like number concepts, they don't appear as an image on an X-ray. Neither can quarks or any other subatomic particle appear on a photograph. That is because X-rays and photographs cannot record those things.
The universe is math. we make the math fit, we learn more of reality. this is how we figure things out overall, be it how many planets there are circling the sun, how weather system works, etc..it all fits and when it fits, it becomes part of our understanding of reality. That is why a quark is considered a legitiment particle to discuss and hypothesis about, because the math supports it, its not just an extra thing that serves no purpose, it is a functional requirement for the structure of our reality..we just have no way to directly manipulate it yet.
Deities on the other hand are not necessary. Long ago, deities controlled the clouds and rain, the earth fertility, the stars, etc..but as we grew in science, we seen this is not the case.
We have most big things figured out, and the math is supporting some final big questions and simply need to further test to prove right...and nowhere in there is a requirement for some all knowing all powerful deity...its just not necessary.
Cosmology, astrology,
evolutionary biology, chemistry, physics (norm and quantum) are the end results. God was the word put in there when our understandings of these areas were minimal..but we dont need gods anymore, we are advanced enough not to need the middle man filter...and certainly not a god described in any of the modern religions..what is that beings function anyhow? How does that being described hold relevance on our reality...is it in charge of gravity or something? what is its point?
God is a emperor in a land of anarchists (anarchists being not the people, but the roles..the things to rule over..sciences like astronomy, etc)
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: chr0naut
Chr0naut,
If god exists only inside the minds of those who believe then yes god cannot be proven by science.
If god exists outside of a human mind then science can be used to measure god and his actions/interactions.
Also philosophy IS a science.
Coomba98
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: chr0naut
Hay digger,
So does god exist outside of human minds? And does he interact with reality?
Coomba98
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: chr0naut
chr0naut, bro, digger!
I cant believe you still dont get it. Your a smart guy, going by your posts.
As you would agree, proof that cannot be shown to someone else is not proof!! God damn it. Lol
It may be the case that an individual is personally justified in their unproven personal experience, but this cannot be demonstrated by anybody else.
So if Yeshi suddenly appeared to you personally, just shows up and bamb there he is. You maybe justified in your belief, but i would not be justified in believing based on what happend to you. Revalation is necessarily 1st person.
So what reason do I have to believe?
Im not telling you you should believe, im asking what proof do you have?
Any unscientific proof is tantamount to an argument from ignorance case.
So what reason (aka: proof) do i have to believe in a god that can only show himself in a supremely stupid and dumb manner that only a few get his message?
A supreme and omnipotent god would know how to definatley win his will to us all.
Aka: god would know what it would take for me to believe!! Yet he doesnt.
Brother Coomba98
originally posted by: chr0naut
Astrology??
God made a world compliant with order and following rules.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: chr0naut
Astrology??
lol...typed too quick. astronomy. dammit, why did they put such a bs thing right next to the same spelling as a real science.
but you get the point I think. dont be pedantic
God made a world compliant with order and following rules.
Which part? what exactly was gods function in designing a world? we know how things form, right from the initial spark of the big bang and all the steps in between.
Where did God step in? according to the bible, he formed the earth first, then took a day to make the rest of the universe...which flys in the face of evidence.
The discussion I think is over. You can embrace anything you want. creationism, flat earth, etc...if it makes the world more interesitng to you, have fun. just dont try to sway politicians to put it in schools and we are good.
originally posted by: coomba98
a reply to: chr0naut
chr0naut,
You keep using argument from ignorance examples for your reason for believing god.
* The universe is amazing and highly complex, we dont truly understand it.... therefore god.
* An extremely unlikely event we dont understand... therefore god.
* The appearence of order in a nature which, on the whole, is tending to entropy which we dont know the proximate cause yet... therefore god.
* The variety of life forms and level of complexity compared with the time frame of life's existence is another.... therefore god (even though we freakin have evolution!!)
* The unknown reason for the complexity and spread of viable states of matter in a universe where all reactions tend towards the lowest energy state possible (i.e: they should reduce to a single outcome rather than a variety), is another. We dont know the answer yet... therefore god.
I could go on as well, and science WILL eventually find the answers to this. Which will show us... therefore 'not' god.
Onto your other post.
Personal experiences that cannot be proven by another or cannot be replicated in controlled experiments is not proof. How can this be evidence?
I ask for a reason why you believe because everything we believe in is based on a reason or reasons. And reasons are powerful indeed, if your reason is good enough i will helplessly believe as you do. The power of reason.
Regarding the burden of proof going both ways, hell no. If someone asserts that something exists in reality, then the burden of proof on the person making the assertions.
According to Wkipedia, 87% - 98% of the population of the Earth have a belief in god. The percentage who do not believe is small. So what? No really so what! How many people in the ancient world believed the world is flat? Or the Earth is the centre of the universe and everything revolves around the Earth.
How many people thought Zeus or Thor or some other storm type god was angry when they saw lightning. Now perked up in the 21st century science explains its not a god, which im sure you agree. Or do you think Yahwah to cause the lightning and if so how did you come to that conclusion. Aka your reason.
So the ratio between who believes in god and who dont is moot point.
Heres a point, athiest numbers are getting bigger and bigger every single year. Lets say 100 years from now the ratio swaps with athiests being 87-98%, would that mean athiests are right? Based on ratio alone? No it does not.
You said:
'So you think it legit for God to blast away your free will?'.
What like he did with Adam @ Eve? Or Moses? Enoch? And the millions of other Jews he appeared too and communicated with? Even Yeshi and the people he met?
How does proving his own existence break free will?
No he prefers to give us high intelligence and a highly curious mind.... then totally disappears with a book left behind to guide us in life, like slavery is ok, gays should be murdered, innocent childred killed, rape a chick and you can the make her your wife etc etc.
Then he says, if you dont believe i exist and also fear me but call it love, then you will be tortured for eternity!!!
Like holy freaking crap man. Thats some pharked up stuff right there.
But thats ok because you think its all ok and logical.
Coomba98
originally posted by: chr0naut
Likewise, in the name of fair and reasonable balance, you shouldn't try and sway politicians or put your beliefs into schools.