Hillary Clinton Supplied Weapons from Benghazi to Al-Qaeda in Syria

originally posted by: ghostrager
True Pundit just released a classified document that outlines a number of weapons being shipped to Syria from Benghazi. They include: 500 sniper rifles, 100 RPGs and 400 howitzer missiles along with ammo.

And here Hillary Clinton said she didn't know that any weapons were shipped out of Libya.

The source, True Pundit, seems to have contact with Wikileaks per the author's twitter. I touched on this in another thread about Assange being on Obama's Killer Tuesday list

The thread title is from True Pundit, but shortened. The whole title is "Wikileaks Bombshell Leaked To True Pundit: Hillary Clinton Supplied Weapons from Benghazi to Al-Qaeda in Syria" suggesting that Wikileaks sent the document.

If that's the case, we may see this document show up in future Podesta leaks but not redacted.

The Intel provides official confirmation of what has been rumored for years: President Obama, his White House, and Hillary Clinton and her State Department knew that weapons were being shipped from Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. Those “rebels” were largely al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood extremist factions, according to corroborating documents.

So just who was running these guns and weapons to Syria? The document is heavily redacted (and for obvious reasons) ........ this confirms that weapons were on the move prior to the Benghazi attack, despite testimony from U.S. officials to the contrary. But it also raises more disturbing scenarios and troubling questions.

Did the Obama administration provide weapons to Islamist extremists who used them to kill four Americans in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. compounds in Benghazi? This latest DIA cable might dovetail with secret intelligence reports previously obtained by The Washington Times indicating the Obama administration armed Islamist extremists and rebels in 2011 as Clinton was trying to overthrow Libyan strong man Muammar Gaddafi.

link to Washington Times article that was mentioned above.

Ghost

I heard rumors of this in the past. Par for the force with cia black ops.

originally posted by: gasface
a reply to: SaturnFX
of course Bush, Bill and Reagan did the same but they are not running for president right now as we speak. Hillary is running for president and she was involved in this specific situation. so i think its fair that we blame her. should we just say "oh well every president has done it, who cares lets vote her in."? or should we blame her?

the issue is the policy bud. next president, regardless of who wins, will do the same, and the president after that, and the one after that.
What is needed here is to address policy and what can legally happen. This is like calling an accountant bad because they used a loophole. no, the loophole is the thing that needs addressing. Arming local populations is a time honored tradition of the US. It is thought that an armed population, along with no fly zones and all other actions will work in the interest of the US.

Why this wont change:
Imagine if we armed the population of north korea and they overthrew Kims despotic regime, unified with the south into a capitalist democracy. People would celebrate this action. This is why the policy wont change anytime soon, because there is some good that can come from it.
But not in the middle east. the people aren't prepared for democracy. At best, we can hope for a benevolent dictator who is friends with the west and clamps down on radical islam.

a reply to: Kapriti

Nice and concise. This shows us what devils the globalists are. It also reveals the reach of globalist shills on this forum. Despite the overwhelming evidence of malfeasance they continue to defend the indefensible and morally corrupt elite, of whom Hillary is simply an errand boy.

The fact that they can compromise and control so many for their 30 pieces of silver, suggest we are nearing an unpleasant terminal state. We Christians call it the judgment of God.

I find it funny that threads like this get less replies then threads about Trump saying the N-Word or calling some woman fat.

We live in pussified times during an era where being PC rules the day. Nobody cares about the death and destruction that Hillary leaves behind, yet if Trump farts the wrong direction, people get offended and need safe spaces.

Tried to flag this, but it just says fail. Sounds like high Treason

Does treason still carry the death penalty in the States?

If so everyone involved in this scheme should be eligible.

a reply to: ghostrager

I am curious why your OP Headline States:
Hillary Clinton Supplied Weapons from Benghazi to Al-Qaeda in Syria

but your OP states:

So just who was running these guns and weapons to Syria? The document is heavily redacted (and for obvious reasons) ........

And this...

this confirms that weapons were on the move prior to the Benghazi attack, despite testimony from U.S. officials to the contrary. But it also raises more disturbing scenarios and troubling questions.

Well...since everyone knows that the CIA+Spec Ops team in Benghazi was there to round up weapons and prevent them from being shipped to terrorists...

Would logic not follow that this was an intelligence report citing weapons leaving Libya ..

And one of the exact reasons the CIA + Spec Ops was sent to Benghazi to round up weapons?

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
I find it funny that threads like this get less replies then threads about Trump saying the N-Word or calling some woman fat.

Cuz he said those things...

This Op however is BS Right-Wing Ideological Fiction Porn...

Ignore the facts and keep one hand free.

They include: 500 sniper rifles, 100 RPGs and 400 howitzer missiles along with ammo.

Remember this people when the gun control queen whines about 'gunz R bad' in the 'wrong' peoples hands.