It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is a description of retroactive classification, a little-known provision of U.S. national security law that allows the government to declassify a document, release it to the public, and then declare it classified later on. Retroactive classification means the government could hand you a document today and prosecute you tomorrow for not giving it back. Retroactive classification can even reach documents that are available in public libraries, on the Internet, or elsewhere in the public domain.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
A couple of points that come to mind.
It is true there is a growing discussion spreading through the MSM about the possibility of her not being the nominee...but...
1.) If, as the author says, she plans on leaving the race this week...WHY did she just commit to millions of dollars of new campaign ad spending in California?
2.) An announcement should be coming very soon about Bill getting a routine checkup and having discovered he's terminally ill.--He IS obviously ill and has been for sometime, however, it has yet to be revealed.
It should happen soon to either:
A. Give Hillary an excuse to drop out and be given respectful distance from the press and the FBI...while she spends quality
time with her ailing husband...or...
B. Gain a sympathy vote and give her the election...while Bill hangs on through the inauguration...and makes an amazing recovery.
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: MotherMayEye
An excellent summary about retroactive classification:
scholarship.law.upenn.edu...
It is a description of retroactive classification, a little-known provision of U.S. national security law that allows the government to declassify a document, release it to the public, and then declare it classified later on. Retroactive classification means the government could hand you a document today and prosecute you tomorrow for not giving it back. Retroactive classification can even reach documents that are available in public libraries, on the Internet, or elsewhere in the public domain.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: MotherMayEye
HERE'S a BIG one...off the top:
www.wsj.com...
originally posted by: CIAGypsy
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: RickinVa
All Hillary is doing right now is rearranging deck chairs on the titanic.
Omg that's priceless......
I don't think she will go down alone. If she goes down, it will be interesting to see who she tries to take with her.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Pyrrho
As much as I'd love this to be true, I thought it was common knowledge that nothing coming from HuffPo is credible.
On that note, this is likely one of those pre-written articles that media producers have ready in case a story hits the news.
No...HuffPo has a platform where anyone can register as a blogger and post content...up until they post utter trash.
That is why the original article includes this caveat ...as does every article on the blogger stream..
"This post is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email."
Huffington Post Politics senior editor Sam Stein told Breitbart News that he doesn’t know why the piece was pulled.
“Sorry. I don’t know. I’d direct your question to a blog editor,” Stein said.
Pressed to provide contact information for the blog editor in question, Stein did not respond further.
...
The Huffington Post’s media team and also HuffPo senior politics editor Sam Stein did not return requests for comment as of press time.
originally posted by: Pyrrho
Ah. Didn't realize this. I never read Huff Po. This would also explain why most of their articles are terribly sourced, inaccurate, and biased. I don't know how that site became so popular as a sourced news provider.
originally posted by: Pyrrho
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Pyrrho
As much as I'd love this to be true, I thought it was common knowledge that nothing coming from HuffPo is credible.
On that note, this is likely one of those pre-written articles that media producers have ready in case a story hits the news.
No...HuffPo has a platform where anyone can register as a blogger and post content...up until they post utter trash.
That is why the original article includes this caveat ...as does every article on the blogger stream..
"This post is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email."
Ah. Didn't realize this. I never read Huff Po. This would also explain why most of their articles are terribly sourced, inaccurate, and biased. I don't know how that site became so popular as a sourced news provider.
originally posted by: angeldoll
She's
a. Had a lawsuit filed against her for money laundering through the Clinton Foundation
b. Is being indicted for the above
c. Has a lawsuit filed against her for racketeering because of her emails
d. Is being indicted for racketeering because of her emails
It depends on which right-wing propagandized rag of a site you choose.
Then the likely truth,
e. none of the above
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: RickinVa
I am curious what the result would be if she were analyzed by a mental health professional.
Analysis of Hillary Reveals ‘Clinical Narcissism’
According to the American Psychiatric Association, this condition includes feelings of superiority, self-importance and “fantasies of unlimited success, fame or power.”