Abortion doctors would lose medical licenses under new Oklahoma bill

a reply to: burgerbuddy
So, abstinence is the answer.
Good theory. Doesn't seem to work in the real world.
Or did people not get pregnant unintentionally when abortion was a crime?

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Responsibility!!!!!

Responsibility or punishment?

a reply to: jimmyx

not exactly, the supreme court will still hear the case, and well, it will only divert back to the lower court decision if they return a tied vote, and even then they could allow it to be reheard again later once the empty seat is filled. then again, they could just do what they seem to be doing with the little sisters case, just ask the opposing parties to come up with suggestions for a suitable compromise, and well delay because they don't want to hand down a tied vote.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

You never heard of people getting knocked up on the pill?
Condoms arent 100% either.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy
So, abstinence is the answer.
Good theory. Doesn't seem to work in the real world.
Or did people not get pregnant unintentionally when abortion was a crime?

50 ways to not introduce the sperm and egg. I'm sure people had that figured out a long time ago.

Abstinence is only 1 way or would you like a link?

a reply to: burgerbuddy

People had home style abortion figured out almost as soon as they had sex figured out.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

50 ways to not introduce the sperm and egg. I'm sure people had that figured out a long time ago.

Right.
And they all worked perfectly when abortion was a crime.

a reply to: burgerbuddy
abstinance is the only method that is 100% effective. are you suggesting that all the married women out there that don't want babies at this point in their lives just refuse their husbands sexual advances?

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Responsibility!!!!!

Responsibility or punishment?

Both? Like cut off a finger joint for each abortion!

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: burgerbuddy

You never heard of people getting knocked up on the pill?
Condoms arent 100% either.

Stomach acid works fine.

But seriously, RU-486 works too.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

does this go for the fathers who decide they don't want the added expense and are the reasons for the women aborting the pregnancy?

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Responsibility!!!!!

Responsibility or punishment?

Both? Like cut off a finger joint for each abortion!

She might actually lose a toe if she's diabetic and forced to give birth to a child she can't take care of.

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: burgerbuddy

People had home style abortion figured out almost as soon as they had sex figured out.

I invested heavily in coat hangers but my stupid broker bought stock in the plastic ones.

I hear a 7 iron works.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Stomach acid works fine.

Where'd you get your medical degree, again?

But seriously, RU-486 works too.

What's the difference between RU-486 and having a abortion, again?

a reply to: burgerbuddy

In 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved RU 486. It is a safe, non-surgical way for women to terminate an unintended pregnancy. RU 486 is also known as mifepristone. It works within the first nine weeks of a pregnancy. Its development represents a huge step forward for women's reproductive health.

www.prochoiceamerica.org...

I imagine the law would revoke the doctor's liscense for prescribing it also.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy

50 ways to not introduce the sperm and egg. I'm sure people had that figured out a long time ago.

Right.
And they all worked perfectly when abortion was a crime.

Lol!!!!

You as funny as I am.

The law is not a deterrent either way. Never has been.

It's people!

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: burgerbuddy
abstinance is the only method that is 100% effective. are you suggesting that all the married women out there that don't want babies at this point in their lives just refuse their husbands sexual advances?

Exactly! Just like that. Divorce works also.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

ya, then we can have all the religious folks griping about the higher divorce rate and poor children in single parent homes, who will then make legislation to ban divorces.

Legislating women's bodies again, I see.

Giving the Transgenders a rest.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BIGPoJo

A hell of a lot harder than finding a job, apparently.

What?
Nonsequitor much?

Appeal to ignorance much?