It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: LABTECH767
Socialism isn't a Christian value, and neither was Jesus a socialist, though we hear that myth being told enough.
Socialism is not synonymous with caring and charity, with giving to the poor, with loving your neighbor etc. What a flurry of glittering generalities. Advocating for more taxes, social safety nets, and the guiding hand of the government is actually the least one can do in terms of caring and charity, giving to the poor, and loving your neighbor. If people wanted to do those things they would go do them, regardless of which economic system or political philosophy is in place.
Neither is socialism akin to a close-knit community.
Nazism and Stalinism and Maoism were deeply influenced by socialism.
People want to make their own decisions. People do not want the government in their lives. Sure their are few
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
Soc has mass appeal and very easy to sell to the uninformed.
Soc assumes people will work as hard for the greater good as they will work for themselves.
Soc assumes that experts can know everything for everybody.
Soc has no way to determine prices, which leads to economic stagnation.
Soc always uses the gov and always makes the gov stronger and stronger over time.
Bigger stronger gov is the means by which corporations get real power outside of the market.
Capitalism is not political but gets blamed for political outcomes. Capitalism gets blamed for gov powers that are socialistic in de facto political actions.
Because Congress cannot be trusted to spend money in a socialist economy. They can't even be trusted to spend in our mix of socialism and capitalism as it is.
Fix corruption in government first, then let's talk about socialism.
It is not theft. It is a bargain, which some people now think they can renege upon. They will learn their mistake
The following year, Lim and Lee represented the PAP at the London Constitutional Talks, which ended in failure: the British declined to grant Singapore internal self-government. On 7 June 1956, David Marshall, disappointed with the constitutional talks, stepped down as Chief Minister, and was replaced by Lim Yew Hock.[6] Lee Kuan Yew eventually accused Lim Chin Siong and his supporters of being Communists, though declassified British government documents later suggested that no evidence was ever found that Lim was a Communist.[7] The PAP first contested the 1955 elections, in which 25 of 32 seats in the legislature were up for election. The party won three seats, one by its leader Lee Kuan Yew, and one by co-founder of the PAP, Lim Chin Siong, the election going to the Labour Front's David Saul Marshall.
Why is Socialism so heavily disliked - Because people have been trained up to dislike it. The rich and powerful, as it seems both Einstien and MLK say unrestrained power of the rich and powerful are able to distort the economy in their own favor.
These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America ASHLEY LUTZ JUN 14 2012, 11:49 PM 1414 This infographic created by Jason at Frugal Dad shows that almost all media comes from the same six sources. That’s consolidated from 50 companies back in 1983. NOTE: This infographic is from last year and is missing some key transactions. GE does not own NBC (or Comcast or any media) anymore. So that 6th company is now Comcast. And Time Warner doesn’t own AOL, so Huffington Post isn’t affiliated with them. But the fact that a few companies own everything demonstrates “the illusion of choice,”
All right. Taxation is theft. There. No more taxes. Also: no more army, navy or air force. No police force, penal system or judicial apparatus. No laws or legal contracts. No recourse to law if someone steals from you or rapes you. No fire department.....
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: lydie15
It's All about the Benjamin's . Socialism Never Creates Wealth , it can Only Absorb it which makes it Doomed to Failure .
technocrat ˈtɛknəkrat/Submit noun an exponent or advocate of technocracy. a member of a technically skilled elite.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Because Congress cannot be trusted to spend money in a socialist economy. They can't even be trusted to spend in our mix of socialism and capitalism as it is.
Fix corruption in government first, then let's talk about socialism.
Or - let's do BOTH, simultaneously. Vote for Bernie.
Because people who stay at home doing nothing, get benefits while others work their asses to pay their benefits...
originally posted by: Vector99
Because people are narcissistic and feel the need to be "better" than another.
Oh aren't you in for a surprise then, no shirt's for your back, no home in god's kingdom for the like's of you brother hater