Doctors who discovered cancer enzymes in vaccines all found murdered.

oh nuuuu...depopulation in vaccines.

-watches population skyrocket with the introduction of vaccines-

welp, that backfired..what was else in there? fertilizer?


I would consider a reverse of that true..and thats been put forward, that gmos are making people become fertile faster, more frequently, etc...eat rice thats been genetically altered to grow up faster and voila, you grow up faster and prepared to have babies at like 8.

guess then that "they" want the population to dwindle and skyrocket at the same time...my god the humanity!

originally posted by: bandersnatch
a reply to: DeathSlayer
www.naturalnews.com...

This is serious #.....Google is our friend....

Natural News doesn't run a single factual story on their site. They make money off of long discredited conspiracy theories.

Already a posted.

Already discredited, more than once.

Nagalase is an enzyme present in normal cells and its use to diagnose or follow-up the diseases claimed to be cured by GcMAF has not been validated. Nagalase deficiency, however, is associated to a rare congenital metabolic disorder called Schindler/Kanzaki disease.

wiki

Nagalase (N-acetylgalactosaminidase) is a normal human enzyme which is essential to glycoprotein synthesis and metabolism. It is constantly being made and broken down by human cells with a half life of 24-48 hours. It is not produced by viruses, although it is secreted in elevated amounts by cancer cells. Except for this and when it is deficient (Schindler’s disease) there is no credible evidence it plays any role in human disease. The directors of the Dutch pathology company that provided most of the “nagalase testing” have been arrested for fraud, forgery and money laundering.

Nagalase has never been found in vaccines. Ever. It is not added to vaccines. It occurs naturally in human cells, but if you test your blood and levels are elevated, it may be indicative of cancer.

The anti-vaccination movement will jump on, manipulate, and incorporate literally anything to back up their paranoid claims, it seems. It's a shame they typically reject any scientific evidence against their conclusions as part of a cover-up or conspiracy.

originally posted by: spygeek

Nagalase has never been found in vaccines. Ever. It is not added to vaccines. It occurs naturally in human cells, but if you test your blood and levels are elevated, it may be indicative of cancer.

You are absolutely correct, nagalase has never been found in vaccines. But apparently the OP has enough proof so I was willing to see what proof he/she has.

The anti-vaccination movement will jump on, manipulate, and incorporate literally anything to back up their paranoid claims, it seems. It's a shame they typically reject any scientific evidence against their conclusions as part of a cover-up or conspiracy.

I don't think it is about rejecting scientific evidence, I think it is about not understanding basic science.

Silly boys, the medical profession has ....how do you say.....gone south ....a hundred years ago. Ya see, it's included in the system we have been hit with....yes they shot at us and missed.....then they shat at us and hit.

med students only know what they teach them in approved med schools.....and all the med schools are owned by one person. He bought all that would give-in....then put the rest out of business, or we would have ten times the facilities operating in North America.

Good gravy man, have ya lost all the good sense God gave ya.

Bull#.

I now work in Pharmaceutical QC.

The checks and double checks needed make sneaking anything impossible.

EVERYTHING is logged. Not even by hand! Raw data from analytical equipment like HPLC ect all have to be printed and logged. NOTHING can be faked or forged.

Lot of honest hard working people work long hours to stop # getting into your meds and vaccines.

Of course I will be called a shill......

a reply to: SaturnFX

It funny with Anti vaxxor logic. If you can even call it "logic".

The reason cancer is so common is because people are living longer.

100 years ago you would likley die before 60 from a infectious disease.

Because that is lew common cancer has taken its place. Plus longer you live there more of a probability a cell will go wrong and become cancerous.

a reply to: bandersnatch

if you can find that story on another site, the link will work. The site you linked to is disallowed on ATS due to something unrelated to the story you are linking.

a reply to: crazyewok


Actually to die of natural causes prior to the intervention of vaccines, prior to there distribution world wide. Meant one on average would pass at during the late 40's which was rare unless one was amongst the elite. In the 1600's average life expectance was 35 and in consideration by the 1700's it had risen to 47.

Though a case in point was President George Washington who lived to the ripe old age of 67.

Further more Autism while first coined in 1911 was really only treated as different from schizophrenia until the 1960's.

Many conditions that are identified today in relation to mental health disorders and organic dysfunctions. Were and probably still are generalized to apparent symptoms. But with time medicine has realized, in the case of the aforementioned they are not.

Autism was around well before doctors diagnosed it.

a reply to: DeathSlayer

Please everyone take note of who here is outright dismissing this.

We can easily make a list and going forward know who to completely disregard as a cog in the disinformation machine.

Don't fall for the "already debunked" tactics. Notice their urgency and desperation.

The statistics are the important data.

Nothing is a "coincidence". Quite easy to see what's happening here.

a reply to: Urantia1111


The statistics show that since the development of vaccines life spans have doubled.

The disease's that vaccines resolve are particularly debilitating.

They affect the human body in a systemic way and meaning they have an effect detrimentally upon life spans. Pretty much a simple issue to understand in that because of vaccines and other modern methods of medical intervention, developed to date. Humans live as much as 3.5 times longer than they did prior to the advent of such technology.

I remember back in the 60's that when a person reached the age of 100 in the United States the received a letter, signed personally by the President of the United States. Today so many people are living to a hundred that they send a letter with a copy of the Presidents signature, as it would take to much time.

Due to the number of people today that reach that age in the US.

if you actually have any real evidence to support your position I would be more than happy to look at that information and provide a response that we can discuss.

Thus far none has been provided.

This is a Science and Technology Forum that is part of ATS, which is inherently related as a Conspiracy Forum. But that does not mean that if you are going to claim something in this Sub-Forum of Above Top Secret, you do not need to provide more than just your opinion to back up your position.

a reply to: GBP/JPY

here is a link to the med schools in america, i can't find two owned by one guy, yet you claim all are?

does this same guy own them all in europe and asia perchance?

a reply to: DeathSlayer

There is no case of murdered doctors (for any reason) without the names and other pertinent details of those dead doctors.

History

Jenner's handwritten draft of the first vaccination

It is known that the process of inoculation was used by Chinese physicians in the 10th century[25] Scholar Ole Lund comments: "The earliest documented examples of vaccination are from India and China in the 17th century, where vaccination with powdered scabs from people infected with smallpox was used to protect against the disease. Smallpox used to be a common disease throughout the world and 20% to 30% of infected persons died from the disease. Smallpox was responsible for 8% to 20% of all deaths in several European countries in the 18th century. The tradition of inoculation may have originated in India in 1000 BCE."[26] The mention of inoculation in the Sact'eya Grantham, an Ayurvedic text, was noted by the French scholar Henri Marie Husson in the journal Dictionaire des sciences médicales.[27] Inoculation was reportedly widely practised in China in the reign of the Longqing Emperor (r. 1567–1572) during the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644).[28] The Anatolian Ottoman Turks knew about methods of inoculation. This kind of inoculation and other forms of variolation were introduced into England by Lady Montagu, a famous English letter-writer and wife of the English ambassador at Istanbul between 1716 and 1718, who almost died from smallpox as a young adult and was physically scarred from it. Inoculation was adopted both in England and in America nearly half a century before Jenner's famous smallpox vaccine of 1796[29] but the death rate of about 2% from this method meant that it was mainly used during dangerous outbreaks of the disease and remained controversial.[30]

It was noticed during the 18th century that people who had suffered from the less virulent cowpox were immune to smallpox and the first recorded use of this idea was by a farmer Benjamin Jesty at Yetminster who had suffered the disease and transmitted it to his own family in 1774, his sons subsequently not getting the mild version of smallpox when later inoculated in 1789. But it was Edward Jenner, a doctor in Berkeley, who established the procedure by introducing material from a cowpox vesicle on Sarah Nelmes, a milkmaid, into the arm of a boy named James Phipps. Two months later he inoculated the boy with smallpox and the disease did not develop. In 1798, Jenner published “An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vacciniae” which coined the term vaccination and created widespread interest. He distinguished 'true' and 'spurious' cowpox (which did not give the desired effect) and developed an "arm-to-arm" method of propagating the vaccine from the vaccinated individual's pustule. Early attempts at confirmation were confounded by contamination with smallpox, but despite controversy within the medical profession and religious opposition to the use of animal material, by 1801 his report was translated into six languages and over 100,000 people were vaccinated.[31]

Since then vaccination campaigns have spread throughout the globe, sometimes prescribed by law or regulations (See Vaccination Acts). Vaccines are now used against a wide variety of diseases besides smallpox. Louis Pasteur further developed the technique during the 19th century, extending its use to killed agents protecting against anthrax and rabies. The method Pasteur used entailed treating the agents for those diseases they lost the ability to infect, whereas inoculation was the hopeful selection of a less virulent form of the disease, and Jenner's vaccination entailed the substitution of a different and less dangerous disease for the one protected against. Pasteur adopted the name vaccine as a generic term in honor of Jenner's discovery.

Source

The mentally ill have through out history been plagued by the issue of how they were labeled. In context there was a time when the term "Idiot", was regarded as in definition to a clinical diagnosis. I remember when I was in my 20's the change in term/diagnosis, from Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder. To Bipolar Disorder because statistically it had become that the former was regarded in society in general, at the time as having a negative connotation.

Researchers in the past concluded incorrectly that Autism resulted in Hallucinations due to how self involved those experienced that condition reacted. That is not the case and it is because of todays technology in relation to also some, rather contentious research done in the early 1900's.

a reply to: spygeek

The antivaxer crowd are always talking about a depopulation agendas, which is ironic, as the only depopulation agenda I can see in this story is a potential consequence of convincing others to be anti-vaccine.

originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: DeathSlayer

Please everyone take note of who here is outright dismissing this.

Conversely, please take note of who here is outright asserting this.

We can easily make a list and going forward know who to completely disregard as a cog in the disinformation machine.

We can easily make a list and going forward know who does not accept clinical research and medical findings, and who has fallen for vaccination hysteria, its misrepresentation and lies.

Rather than disregard them, we should attempt to educate them, and explain to them how they are in error, when they present false or misleading information.

Don't fall for the "already debunked" tactics. Notice their urgency and desperation.

Don't fall for the "correlation implies causation", "appeal to emotion", "arguments by assertion" and generally paranoid tactics. Note their desperate, complete distrust of medical science and its professionals, and their tendency to invent conspiracy when the evidence disagrees with them.

Also note the inherent contradictions in their logic, such as:

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: spygeek

The antivaxer crowd are always talking about a depopulation agendas, which is ironic, as the only depopulation agenda I can see in this story is a potential consequence of convincing others to be anti-vaccine.

The statistics are the important data.

Empirical evidence and legitimate research is the important data.

Nothing is a "coincidence". Quite easy to see what's happening here.

There are plenty of coincidences, both real and invented, but correlation does not, under any circumstances, imply causation. It's quite easy to see what's happening here, when both sides are objectively evaluated.

a reply to: 0zzymand0s


The oldest confirmed person alive today is 116 years old.

a reply to: Urantia1111

Ah yes, let's make a list of all of the people who don't agree with you so you can live in an echo chamber where you never have to be exposed to opinions different to your own.

a reply to: Kashai

The use of the term "idiot" in the early 19th century was NOT related to any particular mental illness. Rather, it was a term used to describe a person with a mental age of less than 3 years old. It has also been used to describe a person with an IQ of less than 30.

Obsessive compulsive disorder is characterized by uncontrollable reoccurring thoughts and obsessions. For example: did I lock the door when I left today? The term is still in use in 2016.

Bipolar disorder is a diagnosis offered when a patient presents with one or more manic episodes and at least one episode of major depression. There are actually two clinical bipolar diagnoses: Bipolar 1 and Bipolar 2. Neither have anything to do with OCD, though there does seem to be some correlation between the two, which is to say that someone who presents as Bipolar will often have OCD characteristics as well.

a reply to: 0zzymand0s

idiot
[id´e-ot]
old term for profound mental retardation, now considered offensive.

idiot savant a person who is generally mentally retarded, yet has a particular mental faculty developed to an unusually high degree, such as for mathematics or music.

Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health, Seventh Edition. © 2003 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.

medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...