It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Dammit. They should have conducted an autopsy!
Nothing in particular sticks out as a certain cause, he could have lived for a decade or longer with these issues.
originally posted by: hellobruce
No, they did not need to, as is explained in the pdf.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
"In the ABSENCE OF INFORMATION SUPPORTING ANY OTHER CAUSE, it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
Dammit. They should have conducted an autopsy!
Nothing in particular sticks out as a certain cause, he could have lived for a decade or longer with these issues.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I did not see anywhere that the physician stated -- "an autopsy was not needed."
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
This means that Scalia's own doctor thinks that other causes may have contributed to his death.
it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I did not see anywhere that the physician stated -- "an autopsy was not needed."
How about reading what I posted.... where did I claim a physician said that?
Your reading comprehension problems appear once again!
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
If you see somewhere that the pdf contains the claim that an autopsy was not needed, POST IT.
it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
In the ABSENCE OF INFORMATION SUPPORTING ANY OTHER CAUSE
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
If you see somewhere that the pdf contains the claim that an autopsy was not needed, POST IT.
it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
The doctor was not surprised he died, thus no autopsy was needed. Nor did the family want one, also stated in the pdf!
So no conspiracy, just a sick old man dying of natural causes!
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Never tried this filesharing site before but here it is:
Link to Open Records Request Document
I will take a look when I can in a bit at your comments and the documents...
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
"In the ABSENCE OF INFORMATION SUPPORTING ANY OTHER CAUSE, it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
why do you care so much that others of us aren't ready to accept that answer just yet?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
If you see somewhere that the pdf contains the claim that an autopsy was not needed, POST IT.
it is reasonable to conclude that his age and significant medical conditions led to his death."
The doctor was not surprised he died, thus no autopsy was needed. Nor did the family want one, also stated in the pdf!
So no conspiracy, just a sick old man dying of natural causes!