It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Of all the Top 17 Hillary Clinton Scandals, her speech income may seem ho-hum. Bill has more of it, and besides, they assigned a lot to the Clinton Foundation. Mr. Clinton gave up more, but Mrs. Clinton did too. Her financial disclosure forms show that Hillary Clinton reported personal income of more than $11 million for 51 speeches in 13 months.
Still, the Clintons have not defined how they decide to designate their speaking fees as income versus charity work. Earlier this year, the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation admitted collecting $26.4 million in previously unreported speaking fees from foreign governments and foreign and U.S. corporations. For tax purposes, who should be treated as the recipient of that money? It is not a silly question.
originally posted by: muse7
This is just rich coming from Sean Hannity and Republicans.
Weren't they the ones that won Citizens United vs FEC?
In the case the conservative lobbying group Citizens United wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton and to advertise the film during television broadcasts in apparent violation of the 2002
The United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by a nonprofit corporation. The principles articulated by the Supreme Court in the case have also been extended to for-profit corporations, labor unions and other associations.
originally posted by: muse7
This is just rich coming from Sean Hannity and Republicans.
Weren't they the ones that won Citizens United vs FEC?
originally posted by: coldkidc
Wait...so why did she charge the Jewish United Fund so much more than everybody else?
originally posted by: coldkidc
Wait...so why did she charge the Jewish United Fund so much more than everybody else?