It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Time and dark matter compression curves cause the so called gravitational lensing and not space being bent.
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: Nochzwei
I do agree with what you're saying in your thread. Space isn't necessarily warping, but we do know for a fact that something is happening to create these effects. For example, gravitational lensing to Relativist's proves that space is being warped but, how do we know for certain that there isn't a different mechanism in play that ISN'T space being bent? Personally I don't like the idea of warping space and time. I think it's wrong, proving it's wrong is going to be near impossible IMO.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Time and dark matter compression curves cause the so called gravitational lensing and not space being bent.
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: Nochzwei
I do agree with what you're saying in your thread. Space isn't necessarily warping, but we do know for a fact that something is happening to create these effects. For example, gravitational lensing to Relativist's proves that space is being warped but, how do we know for certain that there isn't a different mechanism in play that ISN'T space being bent? Personally I don't like the idea of warping space and time. I think it's wrong, proving it's wrong is going to be near impossible IMO.
If there was any shred of truth in GR Einstein would have received the nobel prize for it.
Just because nasa is spending an obscene amount of money to keep the GR dogma alive, the gullible lap up this hoax of a GR hypothesis
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: Nochzwei
I forgot he never got the Nobel prize for Relativity, it was for the photoelectric effect. Interesting...
If gravity isn't the warping of spacetime, what is it?
Lol. What a load of sheites. Go ahd and elaborate, will ya.
originally posted by: moebius
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Time and dark matter compression curves cause the so called gravitational lensing and not space being bent.
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: Nochzwei
I do agree with what you're saying in your thread. Space isn't necessarily warping, but we do know for a fact that something is happening to create these effects. For example, gravitational lensing to Relativist's proves that space is being warped but, how do we know for certain that there isn't a different mechanism in play that ISN'T space being bent? Personally I don't like the idea of warping space and time. I think it's wrong, proving it's wrong is going to be near impossible IMO.
If there was any shred of truth in GR Einstein would have received the nobel prize for it.
Just because nasa is spending an obscene amount of money to keep the GR dogma alive, the gullible lap up this hoax of a GR hypothesis
Nonsense. Gravitational lensing is due to temporal fragmentation caused by quantum field depolarisation by massive objects.
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: yuppa
Many people think gravity is due to some pseudo force that takes place within the atom, rather than the warping of space. I think it's called the electrogravitational theory.
Not only that, I've seen people show evidence against our current understanding of the strong nuclear force. Instead, it's a misunderstanding of gravity at the quantum scale.
If you achieve anti gravity, you have effectively stopped gravity and it has been done
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: yuppa
Yes gravity is the weak force but, how exactly does one stop the weak force. To my knowledge, no one currently has been capable of doing this... If we could prove that the strong force is actually gravity acting more effectively at the quantum scale, maybe we could do what Bob Lazar described. I see this as a possibility because the strong force is more or less based on many assumptions to which could be interpreted differently.
Along the way, Zvi, John Joseph and Henrik, thanks to the time-honored method of “just staring at” the loop integrand provided by unitarity, also stumbled on a new property of gauge theory amplitudes, which tightly couples them to gravity. They found that gauge theory amplitudes can be written in such a way that their kinematic part obeys relations that are structurally identical to the Jacobi identities known to fans of Lie algebras. This so-called color-kinematics duality, when achieved, leads to a simple “double copy” prescription for computing amplitudes in suitable theories of gravity: Take the gauge theory amplitude, remove the color factors and square the kinematic numerator factors. Crudely, a graviton looks very much like two gluons laid on top of each other.
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: Maverick7
I've never thought of probing everything and then have it recorded onto a database. Certainly interesting but, the problem still remains, how are we going to get the probes out there in a reasonable amount of time, to make use of them?
originally posted by: IAmTheRumble
a reply to: akushla99
lol.