It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By Adam Tanner
LIVERMORE, California (Reuters) - Leading nuclear scientists with top security clearances will gather next summer at a screening room east of San Francisco and witness the results of the greatest effort ever in supercomputing.
Using a computer doing 360 trillion calculations a second, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Lab will simulate the explosion of an aging nuclear bomb in three dimensions. The short, highly detailed video produced by the world's fastest computer will attempt to illustrate how missiles dating back to the Nixon administration would perform today.
Nuclear scientists are going to do the simulation of nuke explosion:
"My job ... is to ensure that the nuclear weapons in the stockpile are safe and reliable," said Bruce Goodwin, associate director for defense and nuclear technologies. "Safe means no matter what you do to them they don't go off when they are not supposed to. Reliable means that should the president ever have to use one, it will work exactly as it is supposed to."
The United States has about 10,000 nuclear warheads as a deterrent against attack. Washington stopped real nuclear tests in 1992, a year after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996.
Originally posted by jazzgul
Why do they need to do this simulation? Is nuclear war ahead? Americam military is planing to use Nukes??
[edit on 27-12-2004 by jazzgul]
Originally posted by jazzgul
(...)
why to do a computer one
(...)
[edit on 27-12-2004 by jazzgul]
Originally posted by jazzgul
yeah, no real simulation, I do understand that, but why to do a computer one -must be the reason for it -that is my question. Or maybe nuke simulations are just year to year scheduled ???
[edit on 27-12-2004 by jazzgul]
Originally posted by FLYIN HIGH
I agree with SPOOKY VINCE in the fact that only here in America, we can be sure to make every effort to know that our nuclear weapons and other various forms of WMD's are up to the highest standards of quality control.
Originally posted by Skibum
because we don't do real tests anymore. We have been computer testing them for awhile.
[edit on 27-12-2004 by Skibum]
Originally posted by faddinglight
Originally posted by Skibum
because we don't do real tests anymore. We have been computer testing them for awhile.
[edit on 27-12-2004 by Skibum]
Amen to that. Those things are dangerous, even when stored. I've heard stories of sixteen year olds hacking into military bases and then told that they could have endangered nations because they (at the time) had the ability to launch missles remotely from the base.
Originally posted by popeye0314
Nukes use an element called tritium in order to sequence the initial detenation. As the tritium ages it becomes unstable and thus the nuke becomes unpredictable. I think this is covered somewhere else.
We are also out of tritium and have been using the old soviet nukes as our best source for the element.
Originally posted by faddinglight
Originally posted by Skibum
because we don't do real tests anymore. We have been computer testing them for awhile.
[edit on 27-12-2004 by Skibum]
Amen to that. Those things are dangerous, even when stored. I've heard stories of sixteen year olds hacking into military bases and then told that they could have endangered nations because they (at the time) had the ability to launch missles remotely from the base.
Originally posted by IBM
Ahhhh I see. And as the screen from the simulation shone, a scientist exclaimed "Let their be Light."