It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: 35Foxtrot
I'm thinking this must be on a case by case basis... Not saying passing hippaa info to the FBI is right, by any means, but I've been diagnosed with PTSD since 2009 and I've still purchased many weapons (long rifles and sidearms) even though my head shrinker thinks I'm nuts.
Previously, the FBI has not received mental health information or they have not added it to any sort of database.
The concern is that, if they're now receiving the information, they'll add it to a database checked by the instant-background check when someone purchases a firearm.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Imightknow
Damn brother, I thought this was a call to service or something. This doesn't surprise me man they've been #en us ever since hand touched pen.
originally posted by: beezzer
Privacy is an inherent right.
It is not a privilege granted by the state.
This is an abuse of a Constitutionally protected right.
But it is an effective way to disarm a segment of the population who could use these arms effectively if there were ever a cause to rise up against government.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: beezzer
Privacy is an inherent right.
It is not a privilege granted by the state.
This is an abuse of a Constitutionally protected right.
But it is an effective way to disarm a segment of the population who could use these arms effectively if there were ever a cause to rise up against government.
I guess if you are determined enough, you could gain access to a firearm without the required certification. Everyone is aware of the strict firearm ownership here in the U.K, yet people still possess guns, hell I bet there are a few ex military who have access to semi automatic weapons.
They may think they can take all weapons, but they are still available for the right price.
originally posted by: beezzer
Privacy is an inherent right.
It is not a privilege granted by the state.
This is an abuse of a Constitutionally protected right.
But it is an effective way to disarm a segment of the population who could use these arms effectively if there were ever a cause to rise up against government.
originally posted by: Imightknow
"They may think they can take all weapons, but they are still available for the right price."
Not sure if you realize what you just said, but you are correct. Gun regulation WILL NEVER WORK because money always speaks the loudest. This being the case, WHY IN THE F*#K would people of any country want guns to be illegal? Does it makes sense for only criminals/cops/people with a lot of $$$ to own them?
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: 35Foxtrot
Well, now that all of us vets are consolidated in this thread I'm just wondering where the barracks rats are at? Have you seen any?
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: 35Foxtrot
Well, now that all of us vets are consolidated in this thread I'm just wondering where the barracks rats are at? Have you seen any?
originally posted by: Imightknow
"They may think they can take all weapons, but they are still available for the right price."
Not sure if you realize what you just said, but you are correct. Gun regulation WILL NEVER WORK because money always speaks the loudest. This being the case, WHY IN THE F*#K would people of any country want guns to be illegal? Does it makes sense for only criminals/cops/people with a lot of $$$ to own them?
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Imightknow
That's the only reason I can see all the govt chatter about vets being the biggest threat or the most likely to be domestic terrorist.