Is George Galloway A Containment Specialist?

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
I don't know what a containment specialist is...

But he is definitely controlled opposition in his motives re: Palestine.



As the loudest dissenting voice in UK politics against Israeli occupation and in support of BDS Movement, he gives us all a bad name.

& I think it's with a purpose.

I don't always agree with you but you are a wise man. I always enjoy your commentary.

When you think about it, pretty similar to: Alex Jones, David Icke, etc, etc.

Drop some truth that is already unbelievable in context than drive that train off the tracks with really really unbelievable crap and the whole story gets discredited. I'd say, pretty much anyone with a platform and "permitted" to remain is controlled opposition.

People who are not Galloways, Ickes and Jones's of the world:

Martin Luther King
Malcom X
William Cooper
Michael Hastings

What did they all have in common?
Hint:

~[ ^.^ ]~ (before) ~[ x.x ]~ (after)

Feel free to add to the list.

a reply to: ISeekTruth101

Controversial subjects? You mean Rothschild's Deathtrap In The Sun? Created to be destroyed as a reason for World War Three from we we all emerge as beaten down slaves if at all? What part exactly is he playing when the purpose is division and taking sides.

George is probably a double agent, Why else would the Police move in and rescue him within seconds when he was held hostage and threatened with decapitation in his constituency while out canvassing a number of years ago..He was obviously wired and watched over.

a reply to: woodwardjnr

In the Hillsborough psyop 'the police' as an entity are the villain. It isn't 'the police'. It's precise individuals carrying out exact acts, or failing to perform their duty. Destroying trust in 'the police' is the power grabbers aim.

Have you tried dealing with your local council recently? Corruption is everywhere, it's a society wide problem. Individuals are responsible for their actions.

I'm beginning to suspect George's remit is to funnel as much energy as possible onto the 'police failed to investigate' line. If you're not happy with a police investigation then do your own.

a reply to: Soloprotocol

Interesting point.

When I went to see my MP recently I noticed a police car arrived as I arrived and left as I left.

Common theme here. Police putting themselves in the line of fire to keep the peace.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

~[ ^.^ ]~ (before) ~[ x.x ]~ (after)

Worth pointing out they often fail in their suicide/accident/natural causes hits.

[^.x]

Don't want to put anyone off whistleblowing or truthseeking.

a reply to: SensiblyReckless

Keeping the divisions alive.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Interesting point.

When I went to see my MP recently I noticed a police car arrived as I arrived and left as I left.

Common theme here. Police putting themselves in the line of fire to keep the peace.

They are onto you man..

I remember the George Galloway Hostage situation from a good few years ago, I remember reading the details and hearing it on the news at the time, but for the life of me i cant find anything about it on the net...

George and his canvassing Team were invited into the house where they were surrounded by angry Muslims, There is no way they would have been allowed to call the police, anyway, by the time they could have dialed 999 even with a phone in there pocket or something, the Police were already busting through the door, so the question for me at the time was...How could the Police or whoever his rescuers were, probably special Branch, get on the scene so quick..?

There was only one answer for me...George was Wired for sound.

originally posted by: Soloprotocol


They are onto you man..

If they weren't I would have failed miserably. My technique following 9/11 was to become the most watched nutter in Gloucestershire then throw the evidence I have in the watchers faces. I have inside info on the Sydney Hilton Bombing that demonstrates why getting involved in False Flag Terror or cover-ups is the worst thing you can do for your peace of mind.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


LOL...."I honestly felt physically ill.....it was just awful on so many levels".....


Maybe at home George but not on tv. LOL

originally posted by: woodwardjnr
The establishment have had years to find something grubby on galloway. His house was broken into on numerous times, he was having his phone tapped by journalists, he was set up by the fake sheik, he embarrassed the US senate The best you can do is show his bb video of him acting like a cat. I'm sure if there were something more serious to pin on him it would have been found by now. I like the guy. II know a lot of people don't and wil do anything to sully his reputation but I think he's alright. I'm pretty sure if he was involved in yewtree we would have known by now. I'm pretty sure tptb wouldn't protect galloway. Why would he have known about Saviles wheneven Saviles nearest and dearest didn't know. This Is just another opportunity to drag Galloways name through the. Mud.people don't like the guy now because he stands up for muslims. Which isn't yet a crime in the UK. This is a total hit piece against galloway, with no evidence of anything not even rumours. I know people don't like him, but to make up crap about him. Really serious crap is bang out of order and not what ats is about

Is it crap that he said in one of his weird, ego driven, pretentious arse of all arses radio shows that sometimes when a woman says no to sex she actually means yes and shouldn't then call it rape? Not sure where I'd find the recording but I can clearly remember it on the news and I can clearly remember him not being able to come up with anything to defend himself.

The guy is pathetic - will he do anything for Bradford if he continues to be the MP? Hard to say seeing as when he won the seat he thought he had won in Bedford. Truth is he's a Z list celebrity, why would the so called powers that be actually be that bothered about him?

More to the point of the thread, there is a book out speculating the Bradford disaster was a deliberate act of arson. There is no evidence to prove that whatsoever, so calling it a probability is totally wrong.

Double agent , containment specialist. Controlled opposition. Wow. It must be great to level accusations at people with zero evidence. Why don't you just say you don't like him rather than making stuff up about him. He's an MP for Bradford west. . In the past he's been accused of not representing his constituents. Now when he does he's a double agent/containment specialist, mates with Jimmy saville with absolutely no evidence. Surely if he was any of these things the sun would have hung him out to dry years ago. All I'm reading is cheap shots at someone you don't like because he shares different viewpoints by paranoid conspiracy theorists. Pretty much all his views on any subject can be found on YouTube. He wasn't shy in airing his opinions on his radio shows. Not are really outrageous in any way

a reply to: uncommitted

It seems to be only in the last few days that the anonymous Australian has been mentioned. Before that it was always 'probably a match, cigarette or pipe tobacco'. If this Australian is real www.abovetopsecret.com... we are going to find out why this one cigarette out of so many caused a fire with such profitable timing. Remember the chairman cashed in and became a tax exile in Jersey.

originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Why don't you just say you don't like him...

Because I do like him. He's cuddly and intelligent and does a good cat impersonation.

originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Double agent , containment specialist. Controlled opposition. Wow. It must be great to level accusations at people with zero evidence. Why don't you just say you don't like him rather than making stuff up about him. He's an MP for Bradford west. . In the past he's been accused of not representing his constituents. Now when he does he's a double agent/containment specialist, mates with Jimmy saville with absolutely no evidence. Surely if he was any of these things the sun would have hung him out to dry years ago. All I'm reading is cheap shots at someone you don't like because he shares different viewpoints by paranoid conspiracy theorists. Pretty much all his views on any subject can be found on YouTube. He wasn't shy in airing his opinions on his radio shows. Not are really outrageous in any way

How else do you explain his rescue within seconds of his capture. have you ever called the Police in the UK, the call it's self can last 5 minutes and when the police arrive they dont just bust the door down, maybe George got lucky and his saviors just so happened to be next door and heard the commotion..??

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: uncommitted

It seems to be only in the last few days that the anonymous Australian has been mentioned. Before that it was always 'probably a match, cigarette or pipe tobacco'. If this Australian is real www.abovetopsecret.com... we are going to find out why this one cigarette out of so many caused a fire with such profitable timing. Remember the chairman cashed in and became a tax exile in Jersey.

It's known that rubbish was underneath the stand, always was by all acounts. Personally I think it was an accident waiting to happen. I understand the timing makes it a CT magnet, but at the same time an accident is sometimes an accident.

originally posted by: illuminnaughty
He must have known about SIR jimmy savile and he gave him a hug in the house on big brother. I used like him until I saw that, never mind the cat scene. He`s dodgy which ever way you look at it.

Didn't Jsav and Jake the peg, get their respective titles taken away.....I think they did.....
Says a lot about Britain when we knight paedophiles.

I will tell you what George Galloway is. He is a Vatican loving Protestant hater. A bigot and opportunist if ever there was one.

originally posted by: DrunkYogi
I will tell you what George Galloway is. He is a Vatican loving Protestant hater. A bigot and opportunist if ever there was one.

How so? No don't worry, evidence isn't required in this thread, just opinion

a reply to: Soloprotocol

I would imagine a person in his position, doing that kind of thing, would have the police nearby just in case.

I would think most politicians who are in direct media attention will have similar security precautions in place.