It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bundy didn’t earn it by failing to pay his grazing fees. The welfare rancher label applies to all ranchers who hold permits to graze the vast public spaces of the West, both delinquent and not. It includes the Wright brothers; the ranchers in Iron and Beaver counties in Utah complaining that wild horses eat too much; and 21,000 others.
They are all welfare ranchers subsidized by US taxpayers, and you know who are the biggest welfare ranchers of all, grazing livestock on the hundreds of millions of acres of public grass and forest land, all assisted by public subsidies paid for by US taxpayers?
Billionaires that populate Forbes rich lists.
The .01 percenters. They are the nation’s biggest welfare ranchers, according to numerous environmental and policy groups; and it’s time they brought some attention to themselves, and the federal grazing program they’re exploiting to waste as much as $1 billion a year of taxpayer money while causing long-term damage to one of the public’s most treasured assets. [Source]
originally posted by: elementalgrove
You know, as people become more aware of the world around them.
They will continue unplugging from the psychological programming of entertainment that has captured everyone's consciousness with it's base instinct allure, put in place since Edward Bernays wrote the book Propaganda in 1928.
The diversionary tactics employed by the media to continue this Democrat/Republican paradigm will continue to fail as people stop paying attention to corporate media.
And the quiet unyielding anger that has grown, shall be used as the motivating drive to correct the injustices that have been built up around us.
It is funny that the elite believe they can guide chaos, the very belief that reeks of such hubris and delusional ego, the gods will laugh as they are held accountable for their actions.
In the coming years as the control mechanism known as money, which has destroyed our humanity as well as this beautiful earth is put back in its right place, you would not want to be one of these .01-1%'s
At least from my vantage point!
Agreed friend, the illusion is wearing off in the collective minds of humanity.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
You know, as people become more aware of the world around them. ... They will continue unplugging from the psychological programming of entertainment that has captured everyone's consciousness with it's base instinct allure, put in place since Edward Bernays wrote the book Propaganda in 1928.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
I thought the evil 1 percenters raised their millions of cattle in little square cages then shot a metal rod in the back of their skull to be able to feed you 99cent cheesburgers? Which evil narrative are we to believe and why do you want our hamburgers to cost so much?
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
I thought the evil 1 percenters raised their millions of cattle in little square cages then shot a metal rod in the back of their skull to be able to feed you 99cent cheesburgers? Which evil narrative are we to believe and why do you want our hamburgers to cost so much?
Cattle are raised in cages on Dairies or on a Range. Usually Dairy Cattle and Feed Cattle are raised in different ways depending on area. Dairy Cattle for Milking are the ones usually found in little Cages while Feed Cattle for meat are raised on a Range. This isn't a set rule of course and it mostly comes down to the location and land available.
Subsidies come from taxes so Taxpayers are going to pay either way. Either they pay with their taxes which go to these Ranchers or they pay more at the store when they buy the meat or milk.
For someone who is always rushing to defend the Rich and their Tax breaks, why do you always talk so much sh*t about poor people getting assistance to eat??? Corporate Welfare and Agriculture Subsidies use up way more Taxpayer money than Food assistance and it's going to businesses who are already making a profit. You always talk about how much you hate "Wealth ReDistribution" but only when it goes from the "Rich to Poor" but not the "Poor to the Rich".
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Due to the collective destruction of CAFO's upon the environment as well as the horrific practice of torture of those poor animals, I do not eat meat nor eggs.
I see no reason to convert 70% of our arable land to the growth of GMO, corn,soy, and wheat, to fatten animals up to provide nutrient deficient food that simply causes obesity/cardiovascular disease, arthritis, really name any standard american disease.
My diet is irrelevant to my post however as well as this thread!
The hoarding of wealth is what it is, follow the money and you can not miss the corrupt!
Most ranching and cattle production in the U.S. exist on private lands while public lands contribute less than three percent of U.S. meat production. Only 1.9 percent of the 1.6 million cattle producers in the U.S. are ranching on all western public lands. Hopefully, this corporate abuse of a precious ecosystem and taxpayer dollars will end while the land and wildlife can still recover.
Because federal permits are not retired, those no longer used by smaller operations are simply bought up by the larger operations. It is simple economics why corporations use public lands. Federal permittees pay only $1.35 per month to graze a single cow-calf pair on public lands while the average monthly cost of grazing per cow-calf pair on private lands is $11.10. In addition, subsidies for predator and pest control, drought and fire damage, further make the endeavor more profitable. In a one year period alone, welfare ranching cost taxpayers an estimated $72 million loss for Bureau of Land Management's Range Management Program (2001) and more than $52 million for Forest Service Program (2000).
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: TinfoilTP
You will never wean people off of bacon and eggs to eat rice cakes and soy mashes, mainly because real food is just too damn good and tasty. The day people are regulated to their one serving of real meat on some government holiday is when we turn into communist China.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
You will never wean people off of bacon and eggs to eat rice cakes and soy mashes, mainly because real food is just too damn good and tasty. The day people are regulated to their one serving of real meat on some government holiday is when we turn into communist China.
originally posted by: Elementalist
I do believe divine feminine has had enough abuse and needs to shake the masculine back to its original balance upon universal creations intent.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
You will never wean people off of bacon and eggs to eat rice cakes and soy mashes, mainly because real food is just too damn good and tasty. The day people are regulated to their one serving of real meat on some government holiday is when we turn into communist China.
Oh goody, a know-it-all who thinks the status quo can never change willingly! Well now, this meat-eater is going to double down & encourage more part-time meat-eating just to prove you blind AND to rankle you further
Seriously, if you don't like where the tax money is going, make an effort to not use the product(s) benefiting from the subsidies. In other words, hit 'em in the proverbial crotch & eat less from commercial sources. Also recognize that we need smaller portions that we're conditioned to have to survive on, no one needs the porterhouse bigger than the plate. One the size of your palm once or twice a week gives you plenty of nutrition.