It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: McChillin
I think, perhaps, you also should look at the other side of the coin. Who needs proof, when it's all in your face??? You can't be that far in denial, to deny the obvious, unless, you're literally blind.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: McChillin
. And, truth be told, i really don't feel like giving you the facts, proof, evidence or debating chemtrails because you aren't seeking truth.
And that would be why we are asking to see your proof, but since you don't want to provide that then you aren't really wanting to back your truth claims are you?
THEY say doesn't exist, as compared to not believing in something that does exist.
Well until someone can provide the proof they do exist...they don't?
I think, perhaps, you also should look at the other side of the coin. Who needs proof, when it's all in your face???
You can't be that far in denial, to deny the obvious, unless, you're literally blind.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
I shall attempt to put this as simply as possible: since I can not prove nor disprove the existence of chem-trails as part of intentional design I simply allow for the fact that they may exist.
Aloysius: you claim to be an airline mechanic. I worked line service at a small airport for several years. Among other things, I refueled aircraft. I was trained to recognize all forms of av-gas by sight and scent, just like the rest of the line service crew. I know when I have jet fuel on my hands.
What came out of the sky that one day I referred to earlier was not jet fuel. I don't know what it was, but I know what it was not. Does that mean there is some nefarious deed taking place? Certainly not. But I would like to know what that substance was, and why it came out of an airplane flying over my neighborhood...
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: network dude
The post immediately proceeding yours implies there is significant amounts of evidence. I should think you would address that post rather than mine...
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
But I would like to know what that substance was, and why it came out of an airplane flying over my neighborhood...
The other side gives data, and they say that proof doesn't qualify.
They give you government scientists' data, and say that's evidence.
The contrail conspiracy theorists are lopsided in their research; or should i say: one sided.
Ok then. So, it's the contrails that cause the weather to change; for the skies to go from blue to grey. Or, perhaps, you believe the crazy chemtrailers who think tptb are poisoning us. That's why you spend so much time trying to debunk them, right?
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: McChillin
The other side gives data, and they say that proof doesn't qualify.
That is because their so called proof has been debunked at every turn, now when you can provide something that isn't easily debunked then you might have something, but as of this post it hasn't happened.
They give you government scientists' data, and say that's evidence.
Well what about meteorologists are they not credible, and they don't work for the government?
The contrail conspiracy theorists are lopsided in their research; or should i say: one sided.
Except contrails aren't a conspiracy theory, they are real.
Chemtrails are a conspiracy theory...learn the difference.
Hygroscopy is the ability of a substance to attract and hold water molecules from the surrounding environment. This is achieved through either absorption or adsorption with the absorbing or adsorbing substance becoming physically changed somewhat. This could be by an increase in volume, boiling point, viscosity or other physical characteristic of the substance, as water molecules can become suspended between the substance's molecules in the process.
The hydrophobic effect is the observed tendency of nonpolar substances to aggregate in aqueous solution and exclude water molecules,[1][2] and they fall, specifically under the title rubric when a particular temperature dependence of the affinity of the apolar small molecule or moiety for the aqueous phase obtains.[citation needed] The part of the name, hydrophobic, literally meaning "water-fearing," and it describes the segregation and apparent repulsion between water and nonpolar substances.
Take it for what it's worth. Trying to debate FACTS, is a waste of your time.
Zinc chloride and calcium chloride, as well as potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide (and many different salts), are so hygroscopic that they readily dissolve in the water they absorb: this property is called deliquescence. Not only is sulfuric acid hygroscopic in concentrated form but its solutions are hygroscopic down to concentrations of 10 Vol-% or below. A hygroscopic material will tend to become damp and cakey when exposed to moist air (such as the salt inside salt shakers during humid weather).
Nanotechnology ("nanotech") is the manipulation of matter on an atomic, molecular, and supramolecular scale.
but i do believe that the weather can be altered by spraying certain chemicals,
That's scientific facts! Trying to debunk that fact, should set off alarms, which says that you don't know what you're talking about.
After you're done absorbing those facts, chew on this, and you'll start seeing the bigger picture.