It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ngchunter
I don't know why you'd say or believe that. It's entirely possible, just not anywhere "close by." If it exists though it will not resemble the characteristics ascribed to it by people like Marshall Masters, Nancy Lieder, and the OP who all seem to think it's perpetually visible near the sun to people with webcams, cell phones, and airplane windows
originally posted by: ngchunter
Then why was your first reaction to question whether or not I even had a telescope? I think we both know the answer to that question.
Perhaps I do pat myself on the back some, but at least I'm intellectually honest.
originally posted by: maryhinge
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
i dont now if antone else as thought of this but,
could it be in orbit the other side of the sun so we never get to see it
in my opinion thats the only way it could exist without being seen
i now we have two scopes looking at the sun at all times but these images could be altered
originally posted by: SheopleNation
originally posted by: ngchunter
I don't know why you'd say or believe that. It's entirely possible, just not anywhere "close by." If it exists though it will not resemble the characteristics ascribed to it by people like Marshall Masters, Nancy Lieder, and the OP who all seem to think it's perpetually visible near the sun to people with webcams, cell phones, and airplane windows
Well maybe you should tell them, cause all I have seen is mostly lens flares when people are claiming a planet or 2nd Sun is next to our Sun. ~$heopleNation
originally posted by: Box of Rain
The orbits of the planets is a delicate balancing act, and a planet on the other side of the Sun maybe wouldn't throw off the balance of earth, but it would throw off the balance of the other planets.
originally posted by: SheopleNation
originally posted by: ngchunter
I don't know why you'd say or believe that. It's entirely possible, just not anywhere "close by." If it exists though it will not resemble the characteristics ascribed to it by people like Marshall Masters, Nancy Lieder, and the OP who all seem to think it's perpetually visible near the sun to people with webcams, cell phones, and airplane windows
Well maybe you should tell them, cause all I have seen is mostly lens flares when people are claiming a planet or 2nd Sun is next to our Sun. ~$heopleNation
originally posted by: SheopleNation
originally posted by: ngchunter
Then why was your first reaction to question whether or not I even had a telescope? I think we both know the answer to that question.
Apparently you have a difficult time reading. Again, because I also don't always look at people's signatures when responding, I mean why the hell would I say that if I did?
Why are you so upset anyway, having a bad day?
Nah, I just think you're the kind of person who in the real world likes to listen to themselves talk, such a bundle of joy to be around I am sure. It's not my problem that you got all butt hurt over something so small.
originally posted by: ngchunter
Forget the signature, in the post you responded to I said, and I quote, "It can be viewed with my telescope too." Your reaction to this was to cast doubt on the notion that I even had a telescope. Why are you acting like you didn't know I had one when the post you responded said I did?
As for why you tried to cast doubt, isn't it obvious? Well of course it is, but you're obfuscating. You brought up CW Leonis as an example of something that could only be seen in infrared as an excuse for why it hadn't been seen by observers in general. In fact, CW Leonis is so important to you that it's in your avatar.
It was damaging to your point for me to then point out that amateurs like me HAVE seen it in infrared just fine, so your first attempt at a response was to cast doubt on whether I actually had the equipment I said I had. If you could get people to believe I was lying then my point would fall.
No, I'm having a great day, I'm just not letting you get away with this.
Your decision to try to paint me as a liar is indeed your problem, and I am simply not letting you sweep it under the rug.
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
An amateur astronomer will be looking at exactly what they're told to look at or have been looking at.
There could be 2 billion "amateur astronomers", if none are looking for Planet X, they won't just happen to find it.
originally posted by: SheopleNation
originally posted by: ngchunter
Forget the signature, in the post you responded to I said, and I quote, "It can be viewed with my telescope too." Your reaction to this was to cast doubt on the notion that I even had a telescope. Why are you acting like you didn't know I had one when the post you responded said I did?
Why do you want to forget the signature now? Had I noticed it, I would not have said what I said that has your panties all wadded up.
CW Leonis looks much different in infrared,
Why are you so concerned about what other people think, is this some sort of peeing contest? Do you think people log onto ATS every day thinking to themselves........I wonder if anyone punked ngchunter yet? I just can't wait to see him proved wrong! LMAO! Get over yourself, because in the grand scheme of things, you're not that important.
Now I called you a liar? Know what I think? I think that you're coming unhinged over nothing. It's the holidays, enjoy yourself, I am not your enemy my friend.
originally posted by: ngchunter
It can be viewed with my telescope too. In infrared.
h.dropcanvas.com...
originally posted by: SheopleNation
a reply to: ngchunter
I own a very nice telescope, but I wonder if you in fact do cause not every object is illuminated by Sun Light at certain times, and at other times never. ~$heopleNation
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
The "amateur astronomer" argument always makes me laugh. The single astronomy class I took in college taught me that astronomers dont just search the sky willy nilly.
An amateur astronomer will be looking at exactly what they're told to look at or have been looking at.
There could be 2 billion "amateur astronomers", if none are looking for Planet X, they won't just happen to find it.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
a reply to: Bedlam
I don't know where to begin with your rant?
There's only two sentences, and it's hardly a rant. More of a verbal facepalm.
so i'll just say that you are mis/uninformed..there is a wealth of evidence to suggest that it is knocking on the door
Perhaps you can present some of it, preferably omitting cites from crank sites. If a brown dwarf/gas giant was swooping through the system, you'd think it would be fairly evident, so it shouldn't be difficult to substantiate.
and by the way the mainstream science and 'the arts' is all controlled by TPTB....yes some brave individuals have leaked info/images and they have also been silenced permanently.
Tripe.
...our understanding of the 'laws of the game' and space is infantile IMO.
To the point you've totally foregone learning beans about orbital mechanics and physics, it would seem.
I know brown dwarfs have been tracked on their orbits (many take thousands of years,as is the case with our own) but the point is,until one has been tracked for the entire duration of it's orbit then it is all 'guesswork' albeit educated guesswork...so the true nature,habits and orbital velocity and path cannot be known with certainty..and we have been researching this since the 90's roughly,so that is quite telling...anyway,She is coming soon trust in that.
Basic orbital mechanics has been well known since Kepler and Brahe. So, yeah, you can know quite a bit about any orbiting body. One of many things you can also know is that you can see gas giants that are approaching the plane of the ecliptic. Heck, you can see them way before then. And...nada. Not only that, but there are all SORTS of other effects. And again, nada. Because there is no Nibiru-ish planet X. There likely is an astronomical planet x, out past the Kuiper belt.
Basic astronomy...it's one of those things you can research. The same for orbital mechanics. Grant you, that'll take some math. I always liked "Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students" over Bates' book. But there are plenty of them out there. Actual 'research' involves a bit more than 'how many crank sites can I read'.
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
The "amateur astronomer" argument always makes me laugh. The single astronomy class I took in college taught me that astronomers dont just search the sky willy nilly. An amateur astronomer will be looking at exactly what they're told to look at or have been looking at.
There could be 2 billion "amateur astronomers", if none are looking for Planet X, they won't just happen to find it.
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
originally posted by: Box of Rain
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
An amateur astronomer will be looking at exactly what they're told to look at or have been looking at.
"Told"?
Who tells them?
[B] Exactly! [/B]
There could be 2 billion "amateur astronomers", if none are looking for Planet X, they won't just happen to find it.
Historically, most asteroids and comets have been found by amateur astronomers. They take photographs of a part of the sky over a period of time, and then look for a faint point of light that may be moving in a different path against the backdrop of the other stars. Anything they see moving in a direction that not the same direction as the background stars could be previously undiscovered comets and asteroids.
Any unknown planet could also be found in this same way by the amateurs as they looked for comets and asteroids. A planet (same as an asteroid or comet) would not move the same as the background stars.
I'm sorry, but do you really think astronomers use pictures of the sky & compare visual light sources?
Go take astronomy 101 at the local community college.