It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: marg6043
What I don't understand is why cutting aid to the poor in the US while increasing the foreign aid of other countries, then the latest statistic shows that the welfare state has increased incredibly under the present administration by millions.
It makes no sense.
a reply to: the owlbear
Welfare for farmers gets increased. Oops, "subsidies
President Obama praised it as an example of bipartisan problem-solving that would help create jobs and move the American economy forward.
“Congress passed a bipartisan Farm Bill that is going to make a big difference in communities across the country,” said the president.
Obama’s remarks also focused heavily on economic inequality, which he has previously called “the defining challenge of our time.” The Farm Bill, he said, would “give more Americans a shot at opportunity.”
originally posted by: 19KTankCommander
a reply to: the owlbear
Welfare for farmers gets increased. Oops, "subsidies
I guess you don't know anything about farming, I live in a farming community, if your not a Corporate farmer I agree the subsides are not distributed evenly, but the independent farmer is trying to compete with the corporate farmers they don't stand a chance, they are driving old farm trackers and equipment, price out a new tractor its at least 1/2 million dollars, they do all the work and get squat for there products.
If you look at the Farmers report, there are more and more fewer farmers out there today then 5-10 20 years ago, why? the independent farm can't afford to farm anymore.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
This should concern every American. "Real Foods" such as non GMOs will be affected by this, as production will slow up or cease, as GMOs will be over produced and their prices inflated.
originally posted by: phinubian
a reply to: ArchPlayer
Republicans have a whole lot to worry about though, they got owned and duped as well with the Trojan horse Tea party that last round, I think your requirements for president even eclipse any candidate that they have really had to offer, each one with his or her own skeletons and inadequacies.
You are putting too much faith and stock in a social security number as well as a birth certificate, those might be qualifiers for office but beyond that they are no predictor whether or not that person elected will have the ability to preside, you do remember that the last one that was a product of the republicans really did nothing except get us into Iraq, which his wiser father warned against, and it has led to the ISIS mess we now have, Cheney was the proxy president by the way.
So I don't get too far off topic, does anyone have an updated figure for this in case someone needs to be checked ?
The Food Stamp President
originally posted by: GreyGoo
It annoys me why they don't make cuts like this starting at the top with corporate benefits and such, it's sickening to me why when governments start trying to save money that they seem to go after the poorest in society first whilst the richest get a free for all.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
]
Why would an abundance of food become more expensive?
BTW this is about the only non-GMO food out there, let them eat non-GMO corn I say!
I really wish we would go back to providing "Government food" and not money.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: GreyGoo
It annoys me why they don't make cuts like this starting at the top with corporate benefits and such, it's sickening to me why when governments start trying to save money that they seem to go after the poorest in society first whilst the richest get a free for all.
Kind of a slippery slope. What is the right amount? How far should we support a person who doesn't support themselves, but is physically and mentally able? The Food Stamp program is extremely corrupt, so is there a better way to get real food to the people who really need it?
You know people where not starving before food stamps.... As we shift from the community taking care of their own that they know by name to a faceless Government who sees people as numbers that is what we get. Subsistence is like a drug, once you get it, it is hard to get off of it. The Government gets 1/2 of the population on subsistence then on a whim they can just cut it in half. The Government is the drug dealer and this is control.
Make people hungry and when Hilary comes along in 2016 she will say that she will double food stamps...Obama said "everyone should have a house" and many thought Obama would get them a house when he comes President.
It is all about control and manipulation of the ignorant masses.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
Inflation. Real foods would become more expensive simply because of inflation and to deter independent farmers to grow it. This is a GMO agenda; if you watch Food Inc or any docs out there about the bullying of real farmers you will see why it will go expensive. Nutritious and healthy foods are 4x as much now in this economy than they ever had been. When I was a kid, 20 bucks got you a salad with 30+ veggies and it could last 2 weeks. Now, its impossible to get a salad for the day without spending without 70-100 bucks.
I'm glad the government is not providing food. Remember government cheese? It just didn't melt. Made good mac n cheese baked though.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
Don't forget it was the government that took the right for people to grow their own food, collect veggies, and fish and hunt without their interference away. We are past the point of surviving "in crisis". That is, as a collective. Now they are setting things up to keep people locked in country, versus getting out country. Slippery indeed.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
First, do you really suggest that the only Real Food is non-GMO food? I really wonder who is the driving the bad food train here. The evil GMO people or the Organic people creating a GMO scare to push their prices 3 or 4 times what it should be.
Is there ANY food that has not been genetically modified? I showed Indian corn as an example of non-GMO...
Also what is bad about GMO? Take golden rice that has been genetically modified so that it contains beta-carotene, the source of vitamin A. Lack of vitamin A is a huge issue in many parts of the world, so you are saying that if we provided the world this rice and cured the lack of vitamin A illnesses with it, it is not real food and so harmful?
Plant breeding is something humans have done since the first day of farming and is very time consuming and inaccurate. To take, lets say a gene from a drought resistance planet and put it into a crop plant to get that resistant please tell me how this creates bad food, when we could do the same with enough time by plant breeding?
One side note...we could not feed the world without GMO...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
A lot of people are going back to growing their own. Create a co-op buy a few acres and grow/raise all you need. I say co-op because it first lowers the cost of the land, reduces the maintenance and labor needs and one just does not understand how much food a few acres will make, and how much meat a few calfs provide 8 months later. You can't eat or can it all.....