It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: greyer
originally posted by: Mr Mask
You really have been suckered by some of the worst con-men in the world.
MM
I didn't say I believed it. Though I'm sure there are some people who think that Lazar could have seen a UFO, after all the people close to him got to see them in the air when he took them out at the time he said they were there.
originally posted by: greyer
Notice how the first release of pictures didn't catch all the H's. This because of what I said - everybody who knows something lies because they want to keep it hidden, and surely they are happy that half of the world is ignorant and the other half are skeptics.
It has to be the same mysterious stone people.
originally posted by: greyer
Notice how the first release of pictures didn't catch all the H's. This because of what I said - everybody who knows something lies because they want to keep it hidden, and surely they are happy that half of the world is ignorant and the other half are skeptics.
It has to be the same mysterious stone people.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: greyer
Why do these faces have to be aliens?
originally posted by: Mr Mask
Ok bro, here I'll be nice as I can while I shatter your false world view on science.
Become educated on this subject, and starve the liars who feed off your unawareness.
MM
Originally it was believed that there was an inscription written only on the front legs of the monolith, further research indicated that there was also an inscription on the back of the statue and directly below the left hand of the figure. It contains two texts, one in cuneiform and another Semitic language of possible Sinaitic extraction cuneiform influences
The only sources that refer to the script as “proto-Sumerian” instead of “proto-cuneiform” are those uncritically dependent on Winters. Proto-cuneiform was used circa 3000 BCE, some 4,000 years before the Pokotia monolith.
originally posted by: greyer
originally posted by: Mr Mask
Ok bro, here I'll be nice as I can while I shatter your false world view on science.
Become educated on this subject, and starve the liars who feed off your unawareness.
MM
You know man even though the inner details between us are different, we are agreeing on the basic facts - the hoaxes, the liars... I am not gullible.
Overall though, you didn't describe any logical reason for there being H's at Gobekli Tepe and H's at Puma because you cannot think about it, thinking about it will mean that you have to face the mysterious aspect of reality, the one that you refuse to believe. The point is that we are always wrong about the past, science now understands there was oxygen in the atmosphere a billion years before they believed, it is almost all going to change. You have these strange rock carvings all around the world from this mysterious stone people like Atlantis. We see the evidence. There is a reason for the H's on the belt, just as a reason for the H's at the alien mine in Puma, there is a reason why the people had V looking space suits and made their monuments speak of the stars - because they were probably from space.
If we can get past our ego to looks at the evidences, we can find they give us answers to many things - like why the Sumerians had knowledge of the solar system before anybody thought that would be slightly possible.
originally posted by: greyer
Ok ATS, we have a connection.
The reason why I am bringing up these H's is because of a major significance - a link between ancient Turkey and Ancient Bolivia - the possible home locations to the small reptile looking aliens who visited earth before the great flood and made stone monuments such as Gobekli Tepe (buried directly after to hide their presence), Puma Punku, Easter Island, the Sphinx, Yonaguni Japan, and many others some not made known to the media and some that are.
Here is a picture of this alien race, and this is also the smoking gun.
Originally it was believed that there was an inscription written only on the front legs of the monolith, further research indicated that there was also an inscription on the back of the statue and directly below the left hand of the figure. It contains two texts, one in cuneiform and another Semitic language of possible Sinaitic extraction cuneiform influences
Sumerian cuneiform writings found in ancient Bolivia??? You have to be kidding me! What about the Egyptians found in the southwest desert of America??? Did they want to cover that one up Mr Mask? The Egyptians and Sumerians must have learn hieroglyphs from the aliens, lol I don't care if that is true or not - the darn people of Atlantis are showing themselves all across the world and we are finally learning why they saw lights in the sky and called them gods.
This is another great piece of information for you that think your skeptical mind is correct - it cannot be correct. The dates of mainstream archaeology do not match, funny...
The only sources that refer to the script as “proto-Sumerian” instead of “proto-cuneiform” are those uncritically dependent on Winters. Proto-cuneiform was used circa 3000 BCE, some 4,000 years before the Pokotia monolith.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Mr Mask
never showed how the block got there or how he got the first board under it and it was a poured concrete block so your little demonstration video was nonsense but good enough for linear thinkers. You keep telling me I have been suckered by these people when really you are the one suckered by mainstream science and your insane ideas about human logic and human science being the be all/end all of the knowledge of the universe. If there are beings out there who are more advanced than humans with much more complex worlds (this is what I'm talking about as far as an irrational subject because we're dealing with being probably thousands to millions of years ahead of us) than you can't even begin to imagine our minds could handle theirs. It's like when your dog watches you type on your computer- he has no idea what you are doing. You are looking at this with a Hollywood mentality as if "Mr Spock logic" will solve everything. It's typical linear thinking and like I said guys like you will never understand.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: Mr Mask
That can not be supported by logic due to how science is done.
MM
now THAT is an idiotic statement.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Mr Mask
It's typical linear thinking and like I said guys like you will never understand.
In fact, you have been asked no less than 8 times to explain "non-linear thinking" as you keep suggesting we use, and you have not shown the ability to even explain that.
Nice pictures...sadly the words you placed between them all have no factual base or studies supporting them.
MM
originally posted by: HumAnnunaki
These construction techniques we are just beginning to understand and use in modern society.