It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, either Koyaan is 1) lying and trying to take credit for someone else's find or 2) he found the smoking gun or 3) he used his so called expert knowledge in digital imaging and planted / left an altered document in place.
Note: The Bomford web site can no longer be accessed.
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by PsykoOps
Taitz didn't claim it was 100% without a doubt real that I know of, so I don't see how her credibility has been shot. She submitted it to the court and requested authentication. I would think that would give her more credibility, or at the least keep it level, since she wants it authenticated and isn't just assuming it's real.
Originally posted by Jenna
Taitz didn't claim it was 100% without a doubt real that I know of, so I don't see how her credibility has been shot. She submitted it to the court and requested authentication. I would think that would give her more credibility, or at the least keep it level, since she wants it authenticated and isn't just assuming it's real.
. . . denial never entirely offsets the damage done as doubt can be cast by repeated reference to the forgery and to its contents.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Too late, damage done. It's like asking, "Do you still beat your wife?"
Too late, damage done. It's like asking, "Do you still beat your wife?"
And this is where your theory falls apart, because the Australian Birth Certificate has been on line since 2006.
If that's true why didn't Obama go in and get the juice from doing such a thing (Bill stole a lot of Obama's thunder in the headlines doing this)