It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not going to get anywhere in this friendly thread discussing our safe America.
Test scores are down
Livelihood expenses up
Obesity on the rise
Transportation costs on the rise
Answer: more guns into American Society
The most serious issue of all issues in the world, are gun owners in America earning more gun rights? Or losing gun ownership privlidges?
A madman bludgeoned his girlfriend and her adult daughter to death with a hammer in Queens early Wednesday in a massacre that could be heard down the block because he believed the women were witches who cast a spell on him, police sources and witnesses said.
Estrella Castaneda, 56, and Lina Castaneda, 25, were found with their .s bashed in at their home on 87th St. in East Elmhurst about 12:15 a.m., officials said.
Cops arrested Carlos Amarillo, 44, on charges of murder and criminal possession of a weapon. He told cops he believed the women were witches and had put a spell on him, police sources said.
reply to post by game over man
Debating? You cal insulting,belittling and outright opinions debate? Anyway There should be NO DEBATE at all on this. Its in the constitution. It just IS. If you want to change it do it the proper way. Obama is going down the road of the tyrant in the making
and ignoring the constitution for shame.
I watched the whole speech and I never once heard him say he was going to take your guns away.
Maybe this is a propaganda thread too?
And maybe you just read the title and skipped right over his quotes.
Quote where he says that he's going to take guns away?
Why by Executive Order he did close the so called 'corporate loophole' that was not nor has it ever been used in a 'mass shooting'.
So what does that say ?
He clearly already has.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to federal enclaves and protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond federal enclaves to the states, which was addressed later by McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Heller v. District of Columbia. The Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment, found that the Regulations Act was an unconstitutional ban, and struck down the portion of the Regulations Act that requires all firearms including rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock." "Prior to this decision the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 also restricted residents from owning handguns except for those registered prior to 1975."
District of Columbia v. Heller
reply to post by Bassago
How many impeachable offenses does this guy have to make before SOMEONE has the balls to start proceedings against him?!