It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is only the occassional rare contrail that, in freak instances, persists.
I really don't care what you consider "a credible source". To me, you're sources are bunk, as well. I know what i see. Plain and simple. It really doesn't matter what they're spraying. They're spraying, have admitted they're spraying, and have admitted why they're spraying. Therefore, nothing else needs to be known.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
Here's your source: rense.com...
Rense.com is far from being a credible source, so let me guess you think What in the World are They Spraying is a documentary on chemtrails?
I really don't care what you consider "a credible source". To me, you're sources are bunk, as well. I know what i see. Plain and simple. It really doesn't matter what they're spraying. They're spraying, have admitted they're spraying, and have admitted why they're spraying. Therefore, nothing else needs to be known.
'mI spittin' science based stuff and you're the one here, debunking it. Stop the double speak. If anyone is flipping the bird to science, it's you.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
I really don't care what you consider "a credible source". To me, you're sources are bunk, as well. I know what i see. Plain and simple. It really doesn't matter what they're spraying. They're spraying, have admitted they're spraying, and have admitted why they're spraying. Therefore, nothing else needs to be known.
I forgot anything science based is bunk to you, because all you need are your eyes..
'mI spittin' science based stuff and you're the one here, debunking it. Stop the double speak. If anyone is flipping the bird to science, it's you.
Does this constitute as "evidence" in your world of denial? This comes from a NASA scientist. Now, before you start with your "they're just doing tests", non-sense....remember, you said
Now please show me where they admit to spraying and why they are spraying because that has yet to happen in the real world...only on the internet has that happened.
which i just did. It doesn't matter why...all that matters is that they ARE!
show me where they admit to spraying and why they are spraying because that has yet to happen in the real world
The government still can't be honest about Area 51, or the moon landings, and you want them to tell us what they're doing right above us??? lmfao
Does this constitute as "evidence" in your world of denial? This comes from a NASA scientist.
WonderBoi
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
Does this constitute as "evidence" in your world of denial?
Now please show me where they admit to spraying and why they are spraying because that has yet to happen in the real world...only on the internet has that happened.
There's much you don't know because you're too busy trying to debunk knowledge on ATS all day. Put both sides on the scale and weigh them. The conspiracy facts outweigh the so-called "truth".
Really? What are they? How "perfect"?
There are a number of conditions that need to come together, perfectly, for a contrail to persist.
Do cirrus clouds persist outrageously?
Persistence of, perhaps, 15 minutes, is the result
Why? There was no high overcast before "chemtrails?" No cirrus decks before airplanes?
It is, in fact, impossible.
luxordelphi
reply to post by Phage
There are a number of conditions that need to come together, perfectly, for a contrail to persist. Persistence of, perhaps, 15 minutes, is the result. But you already know this, I think??!!
Yes, i forgot, contrails persist for an entire day. Isn't cloud seeding a science? That's really what i'm don't get with you.
Phage
reply to post by WonderBoi
What science have you provided which:
1) Indicates that contrails cannot persist
2) Indicates that "chemtrails" are anything but persitent contrails