It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
macman
TheRegal
So what?
iPhones are free if you sign a contract. You absolutely need a phone these days. How do you know she even had a data plan? She could've been paying 15 bucks a month for that iPhone.
iPhones....strike that. ALL smartphones under contract require the addition of a Data plan.
You........Loose.........Again...........
TheRegal
you clowns seem to think she MUST BE TIED INTO A $80/MO DATA PLAN AND HAVE PAID FULL PRICE FOR THE PHONE. Straight up; you're wrong.
LDragonFire
reply to post by macman
She could be working a full time job, but still be on ebt. If her job paid a livable wage she would not need ebt. this is the point of this thread!
how can you possibly judge some one standing in line at a convenience store?edit on 24-12-2013 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
opethPA
LDragonFire
reply to post by macman
She could be working a full time job, but still be on ebt. If her job paid a livable wage she would not need ebt. this is the point of this thread!
how can you possibly judge some one standing in line at a convenience store?edit on 24-12-2013 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
Because if 1 person that can afford a smart phone, latest bling, new car, whatever is taking away funds that a person who has to work 3 jobs just to survive could be using then the system is not working right.
Come spend some time in any convenience store in a big city and you can witness this scenario yourself
LDragonFire
Again if they made a livable wage there wouldn't be the need to work 3 jobs. thanks for making this point
opethPA
Because if 1 person that can afford a smart phone, latest bling, new car, whatever is taking away funds that a person who has to work 3 jobs just to survive could be using then the system is not working right.
opethPA
LDragonFire
Again if they made a livable wage there wouldn't be the need to work 3 jobs. thanks for making this point
I work 40-60 hours a week depending on outagesprojects and make a great livableenjoyable wage.
I also have no kids.
A family with 3-4 kids working the same job with the same livable wage would be hard pressed to really enjoy life.
Because that second scenario has kids should their livable wage be higher if they are using the same skill sets and doing the same work?
edit on 2013pAmerica/Chicago3110pam by opethPA because: (no reason given)
opethPA
LDragonFire
Again if they made a livable wage there wouldn't be the need to work 3 jobs. thanks for making this point
So is your logic because someone doesn't make a livable wage it's okay to scam the system?
I work 40-60 hours a week depending on outagesprojects and make a great livableenjoyable wage.
I also have no kids.
A family with 3-4 kids working the same job with the same livable wage would be hard pressed to really enjoy life.
Because that second scenario has kids should their livable wage be higher if they are using the same skill sets and doing the same work?
edit on 2013pAmerica/Chicago3110pam by opethPA because: (no reason given)
TheRegal
Lmao? What side of the argument are you on, here? Honestly, you work 60 hours a week and don't want to be paid more per hour? You're content working 60 hours a week?
2013 slave mentality.
Should their kids starve because they only work 60 hours a week?
LDragonFire
Where is your evidence some one is scamming the system? This thread is about striking workers wanting a livable wage.
hence enter welfare, welfare is designed around the kids needs.
Because that second scenario has kids should their livable wage be higher if they are using the same skill sets and doing the same work?
they are striking for a livable wage, this would include you as well.
Not really but if you want to believe that ok.
TheRegal
You consistently miss the point of this thread to go on about some self-conceived chip on your shouler that you base on personal anecdotes -- full of assumptions that you did no investigation on.
If people got paid a living wage, and all had jobs, we wouldn't need EBT cards for anyone but the physically disabled.