It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
seeker1963
reply to post by FyreByrd
What does the color of ones skin have to do with being a man????
Are you saying there are no angry black men, yellow men, red men???
Sounds like a progressive hit piece of pure pschobabble designed to perpetuate racism versus solving it to me......
HanzHenry
seeker1963
reply to post by FyreByrd
What does the color of ones skin have to do with being a man????
Are you saying there are no angry black men, yellow men, red men???
Sounds like a progressive hit piece of pure pschobabble designed to perpetuate racism versus solving it to me......
It is a numbers game, most of the shafted disenfranchises, the majority of the middle class was white males. There ARE black men just as angry at the RIGHT SOURCE, the MOSTLY non-white job stealing immigrant.\\
TPTB want this to be kept a race thing, if it is allowed to be a local vs. outsider thing..
The PEOPLE WHO BELONG HERE WILL WIN
Jeez, does anyone read an OP anymore? It's not just about color. Here's a scenario for you. 6 people waiting for an interview. A black, Asian and white men. With a Black, Asian and white women. The three dudes would be looking at each other thinking, "Why are we wasting our time here?" Is anyone more qualified than the others? Who knows? The one that is chosen with be the one adequate enough and can fill a particular segment of society. AND, if you read the OP it's white men in power positions that support this. Why? IDK, they don't want the competition?
intrepid
reply to post by terriblyvexed
That's what you're angry about? Words? Pfft. When it's about your kids, job and money THEN you have something to be angry about.
intrepid
reply to post by seeker1963
I'll say it slower then. The OP, and the author by extension, claim that white men are angry because they are disadvantaged by minorities and women. That this is supported by white males UP the food chain, not down.
S ource
Angry white men are everywhere geographically! I look at some groups, like the extreme right wing, who might tend to be more small-town, exurban. Many are suburban, from those sprawling suburbs that extend far into what used to be "rural America." But many of the men I discuss - say men's rights activists or fathers' rights activists, or the men who are violent against women, or guys who go postal - come from all over the country.
I'll say it slower then. The OP, and the author by extension, claim that white men are angry because they are disadvantaged by minorities and women. That this is supported by white males UP the food chain, not down.
seeker1963
reply to post by intrepid
I'll say it slower then. The OP, and the author by extension, claim that white men are angry because they are disadvantaged by minorities and women. That this is supported by white males UP the food chain, not down.
Thank you! Now I get it!
But isn't it those evil "White Men" Up the food chain that are perpetuating this environment of racial hatred and everything else that is dividing us from realizing we are all human beings and we all need to get along to bring peace to this planet for all of us to live "freely" and survive?
Why even bring up the color of ones skin when we all realize it is a bogus and BS tactic that is being used against US, so that THEY can continue their reign of terror and oppression over us????
Because it also involves sex. Men have also been disadvantaged by women.
intrepid
reply to post by seeker1963
In all fairness women were disadvantaged for....ever. It's just that the pendulum swung too far, too fast. It created a lot of animosity.
HanzHenry
reply to post by OneManArmy
imagine an easy to understand analogy.
TPTB are the kings -- those that stay home and send others to do their bidding
The immigrants are the soldiers -- they are the ones ACTUALLY INVADING, and they keep their part of the spoils, and TPTB get what they wanted.. to lower the level of life of AMericans and to have GREATER CONTROL and WEALTH>
sure, but THE IMMIGRANTS are the ACTUAL BENEFICIARIES ALSO...
AND,,,,---> they would RATHER STEAL an American's job, than make their own land better.. Proved by default.
Just like in a strike. SURE< the culprit is the OWNERSHIP... but the workers Job was to KEEP the SCABS out.. the immigrants,...THAT IS HOW IT WAS ALWAYS DONE!!..
ffs, get OUT of the RACISM LOW IQ PARADIGM.
If the immigrants were WHITE, I would HATE THEM THE SAME... AND DO.. the Russians mostly.edit on 23-11-2013 by HanzHenry because: clear