It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
windword
reply to post by daryllyn
He's 90 years old. I doubt that they'll renew his license. He needs to get a state ID. The problem is, this man has means, many elderly folks don't have the means to get to the DMV to get a state ID.
The other side of this discriminatory law is the women's side. In Texas, the law requires the DMV to list a woman's hyphened maiden name with her married name, but the voter registers don't. Now, however, the DMV ID and the voters roles suddenly have to match. Lawmaker Wendy Davis was held up and made to sign an affidavit attesting that she was who she claimed to be.
If lawmakers are caught unaware, how much more so will it be for the average person?
I would have to disagree with the second point. When something as major as your name changes, its up to the individual to update that information so its current.
Bassago
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
Give it a break. You can't buy alcohol, some cold medicines without ID and a lot of other things. It's not unreasonable to require ID when someone is voting to make sure they are who they say they are.
windword
reply to post by daryllyn
I would have to disagree with the second point. When something as major as your name changes, its up to the individual to update that information so its current.
I agree, however, it wasn't necessary in past elections. It is now because of the new voter laws, just put into effect. Not only do women have to scramble to get their paperwork in order, many are unaware that they will have to, until they're turn down at the polls.
jimmyx
if the state government changes the rules on what is a proper ID.....then it is up to the state government to provide free ID's at all state or local government offices, plus it is up to the state government to send out notices to all who are currently on the voter roles, and give those people 180 days to come in and renew with the proper ID's free of charge. also, this can only be done starting on February 1st. in odd numbered years.
by the way, comparing the buying of cold medicines or alcohol, with the constitutional right to vote is ridiculous
Bassago
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
Give it a break. You can't buy alcohol, some cold medicines without ID and a lot of other things. It's not unreasonable to require ID when someone is voting to make sure they are who they say they are.
windword
reply to post by daryllyn
In Texas, the law requires the DMV to list a woman's hyphened maiden name with her married name, but the voter registers don't.
Bassago
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
Give it a break. You can't buy alcohol, some cold medicines without ID and a lot of other things. It's not unreasonable to require ID when someone is voting to make sure they are who they say they are.
District court Judge, Sandra Watts was flagged for voter fraud because her driver’s license lists her maiden name as her middle name, but her voter registration form lists her real middle name. This was never a problem for Watts during the past 49 years in which she voted with the same identification, containing the same information.
One may be tempted to suggest Watts and other women should have known to coordinate their voter registration card with the state mandated name on their driver’s license. However, we’re talking about Texas. As Watts noted, the state mandated that women use their maiden name as their middle name on their driver’s license in 1964 and the problem with the registration card is a direct result of the new voter ID law.
I don’t think most women know that this is going to create a problem,” Watts said. That their maiden name is on their driver’s license, which was mandated in 1964 when I got married, and this. And so why would I want to use a provisional ballot when I’ve been voting regular ballot for the last 49 years?
www.politicususa.com...
jimmyx
Bassago
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
Give it a break. You can't buy alcohol, some cold medicines without ID and a lot of other things. It's not unreasonable to require ID when someone is voting to make sure they are who they say they are.
my 2 cents
if the state government changes the rules on what is a proper ID.....then it is up to the state government to provide free ID's at all state or local government offices, plus it is up to the state government to send out notices to all who are currently on the voter roles, and give those people 180 days to come in and renew with the proper ID's free of charge. also, this can only be done starting on February 1st. in odd numbered years.
it should be made extremely difficult for politicians in office to force changes to any type of voter process...not the other way around.
by the way, comparing the buying of cold medicines or alcohol, with the constitutional right to vote is ridiculousedit on 4-11-2013 by jimmyx because: (no reason given)
SaturnFX
Bassago
damwel
reply to post by blackthorne
Anyone can vote in Texas as long as they vote republican. Freedom? Not so much, let's give it back to Mexico.
Give it a break. You can't buy alcohol, some cold medicines without ID and a lot of other things. It's not unreasonable to require ID when someone is voting to make sure they are who they say they are.
Although it is not unreasonable, it is very, very telling of the -REPUBLICAN- party that they are instituting these laws.
-nowhere in the constitution does it say we have a right to alcohol, nor cold medicine. these things then can be regulated
but voting is absolutely a right secured by the constitution. It does not say you require identification.
the 24th amendment has forbidden poll taxes (gotta pay to vote). If you must buy a ID off the DMV or whatever, that is very much a tax to vote, therefore it is unconstitutional. Reasonable? sure..but unconstitutional.
So, the republicans are always wrapping themselves up in the flag and demanding they are the constitution party, that even when it makes sense and hurts, nothing unconstitutional should happen (due to the constitution being infallible and written by jesus Christ himself, with help of he-man, George Washington, Chuck Norris and Dr. Manhattan). Unless....unless...it disenfranchises the poor..in which case, its an acceptable corruption.
So, do we follow the constitution, or not. Is it something to be preserved for all time as is, or is it a living document that should be amended and altered to fit new realities? you cant suggest both only when it suits your particular agenda.
To obtain an Election Identification Certificate (EIC)
Texas driver license—unexpired or expired no longer than 60 days at the time of voting
Texas personal identification card—unexpired or expired no longer than 60 days at the time of voting
Texas concealed handgun license—unexpired or expired no longer than 60 days at the time of voting
U.S. passport book or card—unexpired or expired no longer than 60 days at the time of voting
U.S. Military identification with photo—unexpired or expired no longer than 60 days at the time of voting
U.S. Citizenship Certificate or Certificate of Naturalization with photo
If you are using a name other than what is on your birth certificate, (example: married name), you will be required to show legal documentation of name change. Documents must be original or certified copy. No photocopies can be accepted.
Acceptable documents:
Marriage license
Divorce decree
Court ordered name change
More on Identification documents
Link
NavyDoc
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say you have to have an ID to buy a gun and the right to keep and bear arms is codified in the Constitution...before the universal franchise, in fact. Would you thus agree that one should not provide ID to own a gun?
Bassago
reply to post by SaturnFX
I get the 24th amendment but it's a stretch between having to pay to vote and requiring ID to prove you're actually American and eligible to vote.
It's doubly important to ensure only US citizens are voting in light of the 2012 presidential elections. With 131 million people voting and 11 million (supposedly, I believe it's higher) illegal aliens in the US that's almost a 10% manipulation of voting figures. You can bet who all the illegals vote for. They want amnesty and the democrats will do pretty much anything to ensure they get that vote.
In another example, an 18-month study by Minnesota Majority found that 341 felons in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area illegally voted in the 2008 election. Compared with the 2.7 million votes cast in the state, 341 seems insignificant. But after the recount of the U.S. Senate race between Norm Coleman and Al Franken, Franken’s margin of victory was only 312 votes.