posted on Nov, 5 2013 @ 07:08 PM
reply to post by CIAGypsy
" undeniable proof (photos, videos, etc that can be proven they are not
I did not know this was possible. You'll have to explain that one to me one day...
The general process I've witnessed many times is as follows:
I saw something.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Ok. Hold on. Pics/video.
Nope. Fake. Manipulated. Blurry. Rock. Weather balloon. Digital artifact. CGI.
Me: no picture or video will ever be good enough to convince somebody who has alreadyade up their mind.
I also found this to be rather odd... " Be sure your sources are not from some extreme, wacked-out opinion (regardless of which side of the argument
you are on) and you should do fine.
If the above advice fails, just walk away and chill out your anger."
Why does anger have to be a part of the equation? And what is a "whacked out opinion"? You mean people who believe complex life has existed on Mars?
People who believe in aliens? Not sure what you mean by that... If I say that
t is my opinion that dragons and unicorns once walked the Earth, is that a "whacked out" opinion? If so, why?
Do you just mean people who do not agree with you, specifically? I am very confused here...
To the.op: welcome and I agree with your method of not asserting anything. My thoughts are that there is a lot we do not know,but it is still fun to
investigate and discuss!
edit on 11/5/2013 by 3n19m470 because: (no reason given)