But, contrails didn't look like that when I was a kid.......

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:24 PM
link   

One aspect of weather pollution in the atmosphere is the generation of contrails. The spreading out of jet contrails into extensive cirrus sheets is a familiar sight. Often, when persistent conditions exist from 25,000 to 40,000 ft, several long contrails increase in number and gradually merge into an almost solid interlaced sheet.




Link to the whole paper

Above is a paper from March of 1970. In the paper, scientific study of the effects of contrails is discussed.
Unless a time machine has been invented, it seems as if Yes, the actually did look like that when you were a kid. You just don't remember.

It's fine to not remember, but to then learn that you were wrong and persist in denying that they could have been there is a bit dishonest.

The internet, not just for watching porn. Who would have thought.




posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 





Unless a time machine has been invented


shhhhhh......

dont tell them about the super top secret time machine....

or the porn.....



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:45 PM
link   
That was 1970. the chemtrail problem really got underway during the nineties. Have you seen this U.S. Patent 5003186? Assigned to Hughes Aircraft Company on March 26, 1991. The idea is to add aluminum oxide to jet fuel and fight global warming. That was the stated purpose. I'm sure there are other purposes as well as other metals they're using, such as thorium oxide, barium and strontium. Please read the patent and you'll see that the global warming fanatics are also connected to chemtrails.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

"This invention relates to a method for the reduction of global warming resulting from the greenhouse effect, and in particular to a method which involves the seeding of the earth's stratosphere with Welsbach-like materials.

Global warming has been a great concern of many environmental scientists. Scientists believe that the greenhouse effect is responsible for global warming. Greatly increased amounts of heat-trapping gases have been generated since the Industrial Revolution. These gases, such as CO.sub.2, CFC, and methane, accumulate in the atmosphere and allow sunlight to stream in freely but block heat from escaping (greenhouse effect). These gases are relatively transparent to sunshine but absorb strongly the long-wavelength infrared radiation released by the earth.

Most current approaches to reduce global warming are to restrict the release of various greenhouse gases, such as CO.sub.2, CFC, and methane. These imply the need to establish new regulations and the need to monitor various gases and to enforce the regulations.

One proposed solution to the problem of global warming involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude. While this method would increase the reflection of visible light incident from space, the metallic particles would trap the long wavelength blackbody radiation released from the earth. This could result in net increase in global warming.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for reduction of global warming due to the greenhouse effect which permits heat to escape through the atmosphere."
www.patents.com...



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:48 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Don't get them mixed up. Using a time machine for porn can lead you to a very strange and bizarre situation.

"uhh, can I even.. should I.. wouldnt she be like.. uhhh..."

Oo

no god will save you then.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   

winofiend
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Don't get them mixed up. Using a time machine for porn can lead you to a very strange and bizarre situation.

"uhh, can I even.. should I.. wouldnt she be like.. uhhh..."

Oo

no god will save you then.


And that is why our slaves cannot know about the existence of time machines, porn and the Chemtrails.


get the three mixed up and the mile high club becomes very very scary.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Lmao!!
oh you win!!

I cannot even go anywhere else now, im stuck up there with all of .. that!!

lol



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:55 PM
link   
"Con"-Trails were slowly introduced.

1 here, 1 there. Used in early weather experiments and markers for weather fronts.

Vietnam pushed a ton of dark technologies...
edit on 10-10-2013 by AbleEndangered because: addition



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   
You've got to laugh. The OP reads ONE paper and that's it, no chemtrails.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by AbleEndangered
 


Really? They were really slowly introduced then considering the first persistent contrail was seen in 1915.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by sayzaar
 


It's been a lot more than "one paper". There has not been one bit of actual proof that chemtrails exist. Lots of patents, that prove nothing, and a lot of "Just look! You'll SEE the difference!"



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 



AbleEndangered
"Con"-Trails were slowly introduced.

1 here, 1 there. Used in early weather experiments and markers for weather fronts.

Vietnam pushed a ton of dark technologies...


Did you notice my cute quotation marks around "Con"?

This is a new term for Chem-trails.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by AbleEndangered
 


Oh, so now you're going to say that contrails are chemtrails.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:50 PM
link   
All those patents, the noaa reports that talk about the metallic debris particles in the atmosphere and say we need more of them to help fight climate change, and all these particles showing up on the ground and in the water, but instead of dealing with these FACTS lets argue over chem/contrails. It doesn't matter what the delivery system is, the geoengineering is reality.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Although the OP engaged in a bait and switch. I can honestly say ' they ' were not around when I was growing up. I'm currently 65. Flew commercially for ten years and have been a sky watcher as far back as I can remember. Airliners also did not leave 'contrails' in checker board or figure eight patterns in the sky.
I'm not going to debate the issue. This is simply MY experience.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by abe froman
 


And let's not forget the Air Force owning the weather by 2025.

www.fas.org...



In 2025, US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


I'm saying its all one big scam on the human mind, yes!!

Con-trails dissipate, "Con"-Trails don't!!
edit on 10-10-2013 by AbleEndangered because: addition!!



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by dazbog
 


Yes, because back then they had the same engines, and the same number of flights that they do now. Of course they did.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   

sayzaar
You've got to laugh. The OP reads ONE paper and that's it, no chemtrails.

Talk about missing the point ! The OP has found a paper that proves that the assertion that "contrails did not look like that when I was a child and thus today's contrails cannot be contrails" is clearly totally wrong. Those who say such things have poor memories. Now if I state that I remember contrails as a child looking the same as they do today the "believer" will state it is my memory that is false. That paper written in 1970 proves myself and people with memories like mine are correct and those with chemtrail beliefs are wrong, on this point. This is hard evidence that means the "look" of the contrail is NOT proof it's a chemtrail.

Given that the "look" of the contrail is the most common reason put forward as proof of a chemtrail the argument is looking even thinner now like the wisp of a thinning cloud......or a contrail



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Witness2008
 



This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.


It's a study, not grounded in reality.



posted on Oct, 10 2013 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by AbleEndangered
 


Then why did someone in 1915 report seeing a contrail that spread out to become cloud cover? Were they already spraying us back then? Or in WWII, or the 1960s, 1970s, or 1980s. I thought they didn't start spraying us until the 1990s.





new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join