[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

Olivet
I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So you are not explaining it so when nothing happens in October or in London you can say it was not really London you meant, nor did you really mean October!

You are just making excuses now why your "ufo" did not appear!

Argyll
reply to post by Olivet

 

The ETs ships materialize and dematerialize. When you don't see them, well...they are dematerialized.

Hmm....I'm keeping a note of all these possible "get out" clauses you keep slipping in

Olivet: "Yes the ships did show up just as I said!"

ATS: "But why did no one see them?"

Olivet; "They were there!....they just de materialised!"

You use your imagination too much. Too many assumptions.

I never used this kind of 'get out'.

Since the very first post (the OP), I clearly said that the UFOs sightings will be...witnessed! It means that AT LEAST ONE OF THE TWO WAVES WILL BE VISIBLE!

BY MANY!

WILL BE PHOTOGRAPHED AND FILMED!

WILL BE WORLDWIDE NEWS!

No, it won't. This thread needs gently putting to sleep to put it out of its misery.

hellobruce

Olivet
I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So you are not explaining it so when nothing happens in October or in London you can say it was not really London you meant, nor did you really mean October!

You are just making excuses now why your "ufo" did not appear!

It will be over London in October. You're focusing too much on the events, not on the consequences. I see further. You don't...yet.

Vasa Croe
reply to post by Argyll

 

Ah...the old de-materializing trick. Those tricky aliens...always fooling us.

You forget MATERIALIZE!

Pauligirl

Argyll
reply to post by Olivet

 

The ETs ships materialize and dematerialize. When you don't see them, well...they are dematerialized.

Hmm....I'm keeping a note of all these possible "get out" clauses you keep slipping in

Olivet: "Yes the ships did show up just as I said!"

ATS: "But why did no one see them?"

Olivet; "They were there!....they just de materialised!"

Now you have to wonder what the OP meant on page one when he said "No invisible spectrum here."

Does that cover dematerialization?

I think he'll be terribly disappointed come November 1. That is if he even believes any of this codswallop himself.

You'll be surprised before November 1!

They will be MATERIALIZED for the sightings moment!

reply to post by Olivet

You use your imagination too much. Too many assumptions. I never used this kind of 'get out'. Since the very first post (the OP), I clearly said that the UFOs sightings will be...witnessed! It means that
AT LEAST ONE OF THE TWO WAVES WILL BE VISIBLE! BY MANY!
WILL BE PHOTOGRAPHED AND FILMED!
WILL BE WORLDWIDE NEWS!

Ah!...I see!.....since you put it in bold type....you've convinced me!

I'd best get my bad self down to that London then!

tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Olivet

 

I am going to stay polite and will tell you that I was taking your point of view. It is potential FOR YOU!

Why do you ridicule yourself like this?

Well you staying polite is actually a contradiction, because for one to stay polite would mean at one time they were and from what I have seen that just isn't part of the program for you....politeness.

The same question could be asked of you also...

Did you see me using gross slang to anyone? Or uncouthness?

I may define some people's behavior, but never speak to them with these kinds of words I already received (fu***, etc).

Argyll
reply to post by Olivet

 

You use your imagination too much. Too many assumptions. I never used this kind of 'get out'. Since the very first post (the OP), I clearly said that the UFOs sightings will be...witnessed! It means that
AT LEAST ONE OF THE TWO WAVES WILL BE VISIBLE! BY MANY!
WILL BE PHOTOGRAPHED AND FILMED!
WILL BE WORLDWIDE NEWS!

Ah!...I see!.....since you put it in bold type....you've convinced me!

I'd best get my bad self down to that London then!

Who said I want to convinve you? You define yourself as SKEPTICAL in your avatar. I don't care about your beliefs. I just care about the way I announced things you were misrepresenting. Hence the capital bold letters. But I see, it wasn't enough for your sarcasm shows us you didn't understand.

I was therefore correcting your assumption about what would be my 'get out' choice. In other words, I won't use the 'dematerialization' excuse for I clearly stated that the UFOs sightings will be VISIBLE (that's even the definition of a sighting). The only potential 'get out' from me would be the ETs betrayal. But I won't need this for it will happen.

Olivet
You forget MATERIALIZE!

Ah, that explains everything!

reply to post by oxbow


Unless the prediction comes true...

If the Ufos appear on the 24th I will bow to your Godlike insight, and if not then
what do you think would be my appropriate response to your thread?

AthlonSavage
If the Ufos appear on the 24th I will bow to your Godlike insight, and if not then
what do you think would be my appropriate response to your thread?

Why are you talking about the 24th? Did I mention it?

reply to post by Olivet


Looks like a let the cat out of the bag.

I *urge* anyone to google "Éric Julien predictions". Please, do it. Enough said.

AthlonSavage
If the Ufos appear on the 24th

The UFO appearing on the 24th was the "Hot tub Boylan" one appearing above Cleveland.... but apparently they were terrified on the invisible unicorns waiting for them so it now has been shifted to 24 November

NoRulesAllowed
I *urge* anyone to google "Éric Julien predictions". Please, do it. Enough said.

Ah, that explains a lot. Just another netkook with many failed "predictions"

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Olivet

 

Looks like a let the cat out of the bag.

Is it supposed to answer my question?

reply to post by Olivet


I know more about Aliens than you do. Have you ever met one?

NoRulesAllowed
I *urge* anyone to google "Éric Julien predictions". Please, do it. Enough said.

You're very late in the discussion. All of this has been addressed since a long time. Just bashing, lies and disinfos. It was proved or showed in my blog.