It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MadMax9
If you cannot mention God's name in a relational way I question how well you know him. I the NT even his closest went from disciples, to friends to sons.
BobAthome
Here u go,, hope this helps,,
in response too,,,
en.wikipedia.org...
its pretty big
they found a name of a Tribe that was Conquered and who's Seed they Cut off,, that name was,,,
see it
here this might be better,,
three guess,,
for those interested,,
belonged too this guy
en.wikipedia.org...
was a floppy disk of his conquests 5 inch,,
ohh here,,
3NL1GHT3N3D1
You say that Israel wasn't allowed to make an idol of Yahweh because it was against his law, yet Christianity has made an idol out of Jesus on the cross. Go to any church in America and you'll find a cross with Jesus hanging on it, usually in a place where the whole congregation can clearly see it.
Also, would you mind giving a summary of the documentary and the points it covers? I don't have time to watch an entire documentary.
WarminIndy
leostokes
reply to post by BobAthome
yes verifiable Historic Facts
There is no such thing as a verifiable historic fact.
You mean that George Washington crossing the Delaware on Christmas night to attack the Hessians could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Jamestown, Virginia being settle by the British could not a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that the Spanish Armada being beaten by a storm could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Attila the Hun sweeping across Eastern Europe could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Caligula's hedonism could not be a verifiable historic act?
Or do you simply mean that when it comes to Biblical history, that all other history is verifiable except that?
Is the Oracle at Delphi verifiable historical fact?
Wait, people believe the Oracle at Delphi was real, but there could never be any prophet from Israel, namely Samuel?
And Helen of Troy, you know she had to not be real....but Helen of Troy is now accepted as real.
I think people need to stop cherry picking historical facts and believing only what they want to believe. The Bible is real in its history.edit on 9/27/2013 by WarminIndy because: (no reason given)
Israel is laid waste and his seed is not
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
reply to post by BobAthome
Wasn't King Saul the King of the Israel? According to the Bible, King Saul wasn't defeated by the Egyptians. He fell on his sword to avoid capture from the Philistines, not the Egyptians.
Saul was the first king of Israel. After his death, King David was anointed King of Israel. David's kingdom, according to the Bible, was a powerful kingdom, later given to Solomon.
Israel is laid waste and his seed is not
The Bible records no such event. So, either the Stele is wrong, or the the Bible is wrong.
windword
reply to post by BobAthome
What's to understand? Either the Stele is wrong, or the Bible is wrong. It's really very simple.
WarminIndy
leostokes
reply to post by BobAthome
yes verifiable Historic Facts
There is no such thing as a verifiable historic fact.
You mean that George Washington crossing the Delaware on Christmas night to attack the Hessians could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Jamestown, Virginia being settle by the British could not a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that the Spanish Armada being beaten by a storm could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Attila the Hun sweeping across Eastern Europe could not be a verifiable historic fact?
You mean that Caligula's hedonism could not be a verifiable historic act?
Or do you simply mean that when it comes to Biblical history, that all other history is verifiable except that?
Is the Oracle at Delphi verifiable historical fact?
Wait, people believe the Oracle at Delphi was real, but there could never be any prophet from Israel, namely Samuel?
And Helen of Troy, you know she had to not be real....but Helen of Troy is now accepted as real.
I think people need to stop cherry picking historical facts and believing only what they want to believe. The Bible is real in its history.edit on 9/27/2013 by WarminIndy because: (no reason given)
windword
reply to post by BobAthome
HaHA, kinda like telling Pilot that Jesus wasn't dead! They woulda put out an APB and start killing anyone that even looked like the man, or people. Wonder why that didn't happen..............
Perhaps they lied to the Pharaoh. Either way, either the Bible is wrong or the Stele is wrong. But, neither provide proof that the Bible stories are true.
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
reply to post by BobAthome
Wasn't King Saul the King of the Israel? According to the Bible, King Saul wasn't defeated by the Egyptians. He fell on his sword to avoid capture from the Philistines, not the Egyptians.
Saul was the first king of Israel. After his death, King David was anointed King of Israel. David's kingdom, according to the Bible, was a powerful kingdom, later given to Solomon.
Israel is laid waste and his seed is not
The Bible records no such event. So, either the Stele is wrong, or the the Bible is wrong.
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
reply to post by BobAthome
Wasn't King Saul the King of the Israel? According to the Bible, King Saul wasn't defeated by the Egyptians. He fell on his sword to avoid capture from the Philistines, not the Egyptians.
Saul was the first king of Israel. After his death, King David was anointed King of Israel. David's kingdom, according to the Bible, was a powerful kingdom, later given to Solomon.
Israel is laid waste and his seed is not
The Bible records no such event. So, either the Stele is wrong, or the the Bible is wrong.
BobAthome
reply to post by windword
"which was sedition against Rome" which finally ended with Constatine's win over Rome and all of the Old Gods of Rome,,, for at that moment,, Rome became Christian tolerant. ,, well u just could not kill them outright,, not like lets say ,,, a Jewish believer,,
leostokes
reply to post by WarminIndy
Do you think that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is a historically verifiable fact?
edit on 28-9-2013 by leostokes because: (no reason given)
Do you think that Osama Bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers is a historically verifiable fact?
Do you think that Saddam Husain had weapons of mass destruction is a historically verifiable fact?
Do you believe the FBI list of Saudi hijackers is a historically verifiable fact?
Do you think that the Wright Brothers were the first to achieve sustained flight is a historically verifiable fact?
Do you think the first working electronic digital computer was the ENIAC at the University of Pennsylvania is a historically verifiable fact?
Do you believe that President Eisenhower met with space aliens is a historically verifiable fact?
edit on 29-9-2013 by leostokes because: (no reason given)
Do you think that Hitler died in the bunker is a historically verifiable fact?
edit on 29-9-2013 by leostokes because: add examples