It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amuk
I admit I didnt follow the trail very much But I didnt see ANY proof.
Dont get me wrong I thought he was guilty but thinking isnt proof.
Originally posted by marg6043
It's called circunstancial evidence and that is how the OJ trial was also.
Originally posted by Amuk
I didnt see anything CLOSE to proving he did it. All they proved to me was he was a lying dog. I will admit to not following it very close, but I would hate to think I was convicted on that little of evidence
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
But I always did have the nagging feeling he did it.
Originally posted by sandge
My prediction: he'll walk. All this brouhaha with the jury *can't* be good for the prosecution.